#1
Posted 27 April 2005 - 03:06 PM
#2
Posted 27 April 2005 - 03:10 PM
The cheeseburger at Palena kicks more ass than a Cossack dancer in a crowded elevator.
---
[The following posts have been split into separate threads:
Palena (mdt) - pre-Thanksgiving, 2010
Palena Cafe (Donrocks) - post-Thanksgiving, 2010
BTS (Burger Tap & Shake) (squidsc)
Smashburger (destruya)]
dcdining.com - Restaurant Reviews - Facebook - Twitter <--- Follow meeeeeeeee!
If you're a member here, please friend me personally on Facebook (send me a message with your screen name, please, so I know which member you are!)
#3
Posted 27 April 2005 - 03:14 PM
Is the lobster burger at Citronelle eligible for consideration? Or is this category limited to beef?
Blast...beaten out by mere moments! Yeah, the lobster burger deserves consideration. Hear good things about the tuna burger, too.
Palena burger, certainly!
At the risk of being run out of town: Lindy's. Southwestern Burger
I know, I know...
Speculative or Theoretical Awards: Breadline, Galileo.
I'll have the beef car-patchio to start, and the braised lamb shank...........and a Yorkie. Buttered.
#4
Posted 27 April 2005 - 03:17 PM
#5
Posted 27 April 2005 - 03:48 PM
Oh, you want a MINIburger thread, you say??Just out of curiosity, why does every bleepin' food board on the internet have to have a bleepin' burger thread?
I'll have the beef car-patchio to start, and the braised lamb shank...........and a Yorkie. Buttered.
#6
Posted 27 April 2005 - 04:28 PM
Where did that come from.Oh, you want a MINIburger thread, you say??(Mark Slater @ Apr 27 2005, 04:46 PM)
Just out of curiosity, why does every bleepin' food board on the internet have to have a bleepin' burger thread?
I think Mark may have been having the same sense of deja vu as I was, in that this same topic started on Chowhound sometime this afternoon.
Of course, as far as I can tell, Mark never actually said this.
#7
Posted 27 April 2005 - 04:30 PM
Like they used to say at Burger King "Have it your waaaaaay..."
Or not.
#8
Posted 27 April 2005 - 09:23 PM
miniburgers are just ok and five guys close to suck. Stoney`s ; never liked.
My own burgers started to kick ass getting better everytime.
If This was west cost no doubt to say `In-n-out burger rocks`
#9
Posted 27 April 2005 - 11:26 PM
Jason Chin
Toronto Phodown
What's life without an occasional surprise?
#10
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:35 AM
#11
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:46 AM
Careful buddy.Oh, you want a MINIburger thread, you say??
That's thin ice you're skating on.
Miniburgers must go!
skewing old
#12
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:57 AM
If This was west cost no doubt to say `In-n-out burger rocks`
But back to DC-Area burgers (on which I have nothing to add because I have not eaten a burger in the almost 2 years we've been back here)...
#13
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:31 AM
In the local chains category, I'll nominate Chadwick's and Clyde's burgers as far superior to Five Guys.
#14
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:40 AM
Which Five Guys have you tried? I enjoy Five Guys, although it really depends on which one you hit.I had the Palena burger last Friday and it was the same old same old to me - which is to say it was pretty much perfect.
In the local chains category, I'll nominate Chadwick's and Clyde's burgers as far superior to Five Guys.
Help homeless pets find a home, Strut Your Mutt 2013.
#15
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:49 AM
But isn't that really like comparing apples and oranges?I had the Palena burger last Friday and it was the same old same old to me - which is to say it was pretty much perfect.
In the local chains category, I'll nominate Chadwick's and Clyde's burgers as far superior to Five Guys.
I think of Five Guys as being a very good fast food burger. I think an offering from a sit-down restaurant, usually bigger and served on chine is an altogether different thing.
#16
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:51 AM
I think I shall have to re-visit.
#17
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:56 AM
That's exactly what I wanted to say. What are they these days? $3?But isn't that really like comparing apples and oranges?
I think of Five Guys as being a very good fast food burger. I think an offering from a sit-down restaurant, usually bigger and served on chine is an altogether different thing.
Definately more upscale fast food than downscale resto.
skewing old
#18
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:57 AM
Sure they're different categories, but I was comparing them as local chains. I've had pretty good (but not great) burgers at the Five Guys in on Route 1 in Woodbridge and poor ones at the Georgetown and Chinatown locations. Never really cared for their fries at any location. I do think there's something to be said for a fresh McDonalds cheeseburger at 5am on a Saturday morning, though.But isn't that really like comparing apples and oranges?
I think of Five Guys as being a very good fast food burger. I think an offering from a sit-down restaurant, usually bigger and served on chine is an altogether different thing.
#19
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:08 AM
Well, the cheeseburger is $4.39 and a regular fries is $1.89, putting you at a dollar or two under the price of a cheeseburger and fries at most downscale restaurants.That's exactly what I wanted to say. What are they these days? $3?
Definately more upscale fast food than downscale resto.
#20
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:12 AM
Hmmm. Now I just need to decide between Morton's and Five Guys for lunch today.
#21
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:23 AM
I do like the burger at Mortons, and the burger at Chef Geoff's (especially on the last Monday of the month) is pretty good. But I can't make a claim about "best" easily.
Also, I've heard there's a wagyu burger at Landmark Restaurant in the Melrose that is to die for. Sonoma will also apparently be featuring a wagyu burger, significantly closer to home...
K
#22
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:28 AM
It sounds like there be be a couple of categories here: The fast food burger (a la 5 guys), the sit down burger (Paleana) and the seafood burger (Citronelle). What other places belong in these categories. Or is this too much segmentation? I get the feeling that the sit down places will beat the fast food places most every time. And which category would the burgers at the Tune Inn fit?
#23
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:38 AM
Maybe there should be separate bar burger and yupscale burger categories instead of one sit down group.It sounds like there be be a couple of categories here: The fast food burger (a la 5 guys), the sit down burger (Paleana) and the seafood burger (Citronelle). What other places belong in these categories. Or is this too much segmentation? I get the feeling that the sit down places will beat the fast food places most every time. And which category would the burgers at the Tune Inn fit?
With Citronelle's lobster burger, having a "Best Seafood Burger" category would be as predetermined as a North Korean election.
Also, Sign of the Whale.
#24
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:20 AM
Hey Nadya, where's Sign of the Whale again?Also, Sign of the Whale.
I think this is going to be a fairly short contest.
I'll have the beef car-patchio to start, and the braised lamb shank...........and a Yorkie. Buttered.
#25
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:35 AM
Shogun do you know if they are still tasty? It is still there, isn't it?
#26
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:50 AM
howEVER: They have recently moved away from peanut oil to cook the fries.
I was just there the other day, actually. Was going to get a Southwestern, but instead opted for the "National's Special": a big quarter pound hot dog topped with BBQ (I just sez the other day, "Shogun", I sez, "More things need to be topped with BBQ!"
I'll have the beef car-patchio to start, and the braised lamb shank...........and a Yorkie. Buttered.
#27
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:53 AM
They feature the Wagyu burger at Mendocino on brioche -- quite tasty even without the bun. I agree that it is truly difficult to judge "THE BEST" burger. Do have strong opinions on "THE WORST"Also, I've heard there's a wagyu burger at Landmark Restaurant in the Melrose that is to die for. Sonoma will also apparently be featuring a wagyu burger, significantly closer to home...
K
Boulevardier
Bon Vivant
Besotted
Epistemological Optimist
"I would like to take you seriously, but to do so would affront your intelligence."
"You too can have the soothing feeling of nature's own baby-soft wool being pulled over your resting eyes." - Herb Block
#28
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:55 AM
What does a National Special go for? How about the Southwestern?Oh yeah, absolutely still there, and still pretty good! That is to say, it's as good as it was when I moved here a few years ago. Prices have slowly ticked upwards, though, but I suppose that's bound to happen.
howEVER: They have recently moved away from peanut oil to cook the fries.![]()
I was just there the other day, actually. Was going to get a Southwestern, but instead opted for the "National's Special": a big quarter pound hot dog topped with BBQ (I just sez the other day, "Shogun", I sez, "More things need to be topped with BBQ!"), with regular fries and a little bag of peanuts! Also got a deal on a large soda if you get it with the combo. Forget offhand how much it was, but it was a pretty good deal!
#29
Posted 28 April 2005 - 11:29 AM
There seem to be two main issues...the size of the bun, and the juicieness.
First the bun..before putting the burger on the Cafe menu we tried several variations on ratio of meat to bun. I ultimately decided that me being a "sopper", I wanted enough bread in my hand first to handle the meat, and second, to sopp up any juices that might, and does, drip on to the plate. Even to sopp the oil that we drizzle on the pickles. A good quality bun is the key here..(by the way, the bun is more of a Parker House roll dough and not the brioche bun of which it is routinely referred. Brioche seems to have lost all of it's noble distinction..but that is another issue), fresh baked daily, lightly grilled then topped with the garlic scented mayonnaise.
The meat: We started off a little smaller than we have now (the bun has stayed the same size) and after much Q&A and customer feedback, we opted to go a little heavier. We are not trying to be cheap here, it is just that we are trying to make a really good burger. Too much meat could be bad as well. We make every effort to control what we can..Bun-recipe, mayo-recipe, same ingredients to make them, same cheese, we have been buying the same meat now for months(we grind it ourselves every day)..but lately there does seem to be some difference, not only of the burger meat, but even the Kobe style beef we buy and the veal..could be a seasonal thing. another factor that comes into play is who shaped the burgers that day..everyone tries doing it the same, but making it a bit too compact does offer some variation.Although we all pay just as much attention to building the burger and with the same passion as we do say, the boudin blanc, some variation does seem to occur.
Palena Restaurant
Washington, D.C.
#30
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:00 PM
#31
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:01 PM
Frank, I'm wondering if you do anything to the meat before grilling, such as adding any seasonings?
Jason Chin
Toronto Phodown
What's life without an occasional surprise?
#32
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:05 PM
See, the bun is where most places drop the ball. Almost always it overwhelms the meat.I have not been in a number of years but when I worked downtown I regularly enjoyed the hamburger for lunch at Sam & Harry's. Big, juicy and crusty on the outside. Nice buns too.
#33
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:08 PM
I actually prefer the tuna burger over the lobster burger, which is odd because I generally prefer lobster over tuna (but good, because the tuna burger seems to be available much more frequently).Maybe there should be separate bar burger and yupscale burger categories instead of one sit down group.
With Citronelle's lobster burger, having a "Best Seafood Burger" category would be as predetermined as a North Korean election.
Also, Sign of the Whale.
#34
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:09 PM
Oh that's too bad.Oh yeah, absolutely still there, and still pretty good! That is to say, it's as good as it was when I moved here a few years ago. Prices have slowly ticked upwards, though, but I suppose that's bound to happen.
howEVER: They have recently moved away from peanut oil to cook the fries.![]()
When I worked at the Kennedy Center I would walk over there about once a week. Always got the one with onions, mushrooms and A-1 sauce and ate it while walking back. I ruined several good shirts that way.
#35
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:25 PM
The 'Robert', If My Memory Serves Me CorrectlyOh that's too bad.
When I worked at the Kennedy Center I would walk over there about once a week. Always got the one with onions, mushrooms and A-1 sauce and ate it while walking back. I ruined several good shirts that way.
A fine burger indeed.
I'll have the beef car-patchio to start, and the braised lamb shank...........and a Yorkie. Buttered.
#36
Posted 28 April 2005 - 01:01 PM
But this was pretty tasty and appropriately greasy, if a bit dense. My memory is of a slightly crispy, loose patty and today I only had a few bites that had that same texture.
I had heard stories about long lines at lunch at the Reston/Herndon loaction so I've stayed away so far. But that wasn't a problem. I'm sure I'll be back sooner the next time.
#37
Posted 28 April 2005 - 01:08 PM
As I was standing in the long line contemplating my burger (darn those long lines and people who phone in orders for their entire offce / congressional district) I pondered another element of a good burger. The stuff. It's the reason 5 guys is my favorite local burger place, a good mix of addons. And the jalepeno / onion combination should keep the boss away.
On the subject of "stuff" the fried lemon slices that come with the Palena burger are a perfect side to the burger.
#38
Posted 28 April 2005 - 01:15 PM
#39
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:16 PM
National's Special: $5.50 (Discounted jumbo soda: $0.95 w/ combo)What does a National Special go for? How about the Southwestern?
Burger, Southwestern or otherwise, single: $3.80 (With three or four that are $4.20)
Those are take-out prices; I'm pretty sure it's 10% more upstairs (also a new development).
I'll have the beef car-patchio to start, and the braised lamb shank...........and a Yorkie. Buttered.
#40
Posted 29 April 2005 - 09:45 AM
I love Five Guys, but I have noticed that the quality varies widely, and seems to correlate pretty strongly to the percentage of adults running the place.I definitely agree with the burger at Palena , top notch.
miniburgers are just ok and five guys close to suck. Stoney`s ; never liked.
My own burgers started to kick ass getting better everytime.
If This was west cost no doubt to say `In-n-out burger rocks`
Locations that I've had good fortune at: Georgetown, Herndon, Woodbridge, Alexandria Old Town, Alexandria Route 1
Locations that are not so good: Howard University, Reston
Five people are in a restaurant, and the bill comes to £112.48. If two people had starters but no wine, one person has had wine but no dessert, one person is moaning that they had the vegetarian and that was cheaper, another person had no starter or dessert, but ordered an extra bottle of wine without asking anyone else, calculate the number of different Switch/Visa/Carbon/Delta cards you can hand the waiter before they kill you.
#41
Posted 01 May 2005 - 06:27 PM
#42
Posted 02 May 2005 - 11:38 PM
#43
Posted 03 May 2005 - 06:23 AM
"A thick layer of beef fat and cabernet obscures my memories of the evening. It's possible I was raped by a bull."
#44
Posted 03 May 2005 - 09:32 AM
Hmm, two of the three major food groups: grease and salt (the 3rd being sugar).You can also get them at Friday lunch and, if I remember right, on Thursday evenings. The fried onion rings are nonpareil, too. Anything fried there, really.
#45
Posted 03 May 2005 - 09:39 AM
Add some of her pineapple upside down cake and you will be covered!Hmm, two of the three major food groups: grease and salt (the 3rd being sugar).
Must get back to CK to try a burger.
Help homeless pets find a home, Strut Your Mutt 2013.
#46
Posted 05 May 2005 - 10:16 AM
But I just had a wonderful burger at Charlie Palmers for lunch the other day. The bread was soft and the meat....ooooh the meat. it was on the rare side (which is the best way in my opinion) and with some really sharp cheese on the top.
good god that was a treat
#47
Posted 05 May 2005 - 12:24 PM
I'll have the beef car-patchio to start, and the braised lamb shank...........and a Yorkie. Buttered.
#48
Posted 05 May 2005 - 12:34 PM
Charlie Palmer does have a very good $20 3-course lunch special, but the burger is not avialable as part of it.Doesn't Charlie Palmer have a $20 lunch special? I know somebody [expense account steak house genre] does...might be Smith and Wollensky.
#49
Posted 05 May 2005 - 03:19 PM
Have you tried TenPenh's tuna burger? Mmm-mmm good (and available daily!).I actually prefer the tuna burger over the lobster burger, which is odd because I generally prefer lobster over tuna (but good, because the tuna burger seems to be available much more frequently).
#50
Posted 05 May 2005 - 03:31 PM
I have never been happy with the burger at Carlyle (or with the restaurant in general).
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Hamburgers
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











