Caterer for 150 Person "Cocktail Style" Wedding Reception
#1
Posted 31 July 2012 - 04:22 PM
I am getting married on December 1 in DC. We will have about 150 people, and do not want to do a seated dinner. We would like to do a "cocktail party" set up where a caterer would handle passed hors d'ouvres and one finger food station. We will also need them to handle the bar.
Of course, we want to spend as little as possible doing this. Anyone have any recommendations for out of the box solutions? I don't want to go the BBQ route or anything like that -- the food needs to be finger friendly.
Thanks!
#2
Posted 31 July 2012 - 04:27 PM
#3
Posted 31 July 2012 - 04:52 PM
#4
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:50 PM
I've been to a couple b-day parties catered by them also with pretty good results.
#5
Posted 01 August 2012 - 06:47 AM
Elizabeth Miller
fast cars, slow food
#6
Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:22 AM
I'm getting married in October in DC and have been working with Well Dunn (specifically Yulia) and they have been tremendous thus far. Without doing a seated dinner I'd say they would be able to help you and stay within the range you mentioned above. The food (we did our tasting a few weeks ago) was tremendous and they're very creative / flexible. Additionally, in DC you can pick up the alcohol on your own and they'll serve it (I guess its dependant on your venue)...they'll supply the mixers and what not and work with you on amounts, etc.
"Make sure that the beer - four pints a week - goes to the troops under fire before any of the parties in the rear get a drop."
-Winston Churchill to his Secretary of War, 1944
#7
Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:23 AM
#8
Posted 01 August 2012 - 08:50 AM
I think you get a good value for the price and a decent amount of food. Other than one event we did with a marauding herd of college students we have always had plenty of food left over.
#9
Posted 01 August 2012 - 10:12 AM
#10
Posted 01 August 2012 - 12:33 PM
1. They are often the same people who work for caterers. We don't charge for the people; its a direct to the people that staff your party. That probably saves you a bit on mark up and overhead. You could contact the school direct at our placement phone # at 703 841-9757. We have a very professional, responsible placement person who can help. You can DM me here. I'll give references to some people who have been doing events and parties for years. Unfortunately I'm not up to date with what we charge or what the experienced people charge. But I suspect its lower per hour than through a caterer if only b/c of no mark up.
2. The grads can provide a list of alcohol, mixers, and extras for a party. It works. It could be a bit dated, but its easy to update. You of course can make all types of substitutions. If you follow the suggestions of the folks above, and you buy your own alcohol, mixers, supplies you will also probably save somewhat on overhead. Lots of people do that.
At 150 adults you are between 1 good experienced bartender and 2 bartenders. 1 good experienced person can handle that sized crowd, essentially keep people from waiting on line, keep their drinks refreshed and help you have a successful wedding with everyone enjoying the event. To be on the safe side, and if you aren't sure about the staffing efficiency then you should have 2 at the bar.
3. I'm not going to comment on caterers. There are a lot of great ones. I always like going with a strong recommendation from someone who has used them before and could use them again. Most caterers will work with your flexibility.
Most of all: Congratulations and good luck. Have a great wedding.
#11
Posted 03 August 2012 - 01:30 PM
At 150 adults you are between 1 good experienced bartender and 2 bartenders. 1 good experienced person can handle that sized crowd, essentially keep people from waiting on line, keep their drinks refreshed and help you have a successful wedding with everyone enjoying the event. To be on the safe side, and if you aren't sure about the staffing efficiency then you should have 2 at the bar.
I'm sure you have more expertise than I, but judging from the near-constant weddings and office parties I attend: in no way is one bartender sufficient for 150 people, no matter how experienced--unless they're only serving beer and wine, and even then, one is really stretching it. To be fair, my friends and family are probably at the high end of the curve as far as bar requirements are concerned, but waiting forever at a bar just stinks (and may result in more product loss because folks will end up just asking for two drinks so they don't have to wait again and then misplacing that second one) (or so I've heard...
#12
Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:28 PM
I'm sure you have more expertise than I, but judging from the near-constant weddings and office parties I attend: in no way is one bartender sufficient for 150 people, no matter how experienced--unless they're only serving beer and wine, and even then, one is really stretching it. To be fair, my friends and family are probably at the high end of the curve as far as bar requirements are concerned, but waiting forever at a bar just stinks (and may result in more product loss because folks will end up just asking for two drinks so they don't have to wait again and then misplacing that second one) (or so I've heard...
).
That is why I suggested "between 1 and 2". ONE, if they are good, and efficient, experienced and capable. I'm comfortable with some of our grads handling that. I'm not comfortable with everyone doing that. ONE: If you wish to save on staffing costs for the 3-5 hours. TWO: if you wish to be safe.
I also think that in a wedding, waiting forever at the bar does stink, and the hosts really don't want that, since the guests are friends and family celebrating with you.
But I wanted to present both possibilities, since there is a budget.
#13
Posted 03 August 2012 - 04:51 PM
That is why I suggested "between 1 and 2". ONE, if they are good, and efficient, experienced and capable. I'm comfortable with some of our grads handling that. I'm not comfortable with everyone doing that. ONE: If you wish to save on staffing costs for the 3-5 hours. TWO: if you wish to be safe.
I also think that in a wedding, waiting forever at the bar does stink, and the hosts really don't want that, since the guests are friends and family celebrating with you.
But I wanted to present both possibilities, since there is a budget.
I'm strongly in the "two inexperienced" camp here - this is one area that you don't want to skimp on, and I think a second body would be more important than one talented individual. People might not notice if there was one less server; the bar is the aorta of any respectable wedding reception.
Rieux, needless to say, I'd get in touch with Dave. His was a very thoughtful post.
dcdining.com - Restaurant Reviews - Facebook - Twitter <--- Follow meeeeeeeee!
If you're a member here, please friend me personally on Facebook (send me a message with your screen name, please, so I know which member you are!)
#14
Posted 06 August 2012 - 05:54 PM
#15
Posted 06 August 2012 - 09:43 PM
This thread has been invaluable and a great example of the collected knowledge of this board!
#16
Posted 01 September 2012 - 05:39 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












