Jump to content


Photo

Buck's Fishing and Camping, Upper Conn. Ave. NW - Chef James Rexroad Replaces Vickie Reh

Chevy Chase DC American Southern

  • Please log in to reply
144 replies to this topic

#1 DonRocks

DonRocks

    leviathan

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,172 posts

Posted 18 April 2005 - 06:17 PM

[posted on eGullet 2003-2004]

Buck's is an interesting, pleasant space that should do quite well in this location. The atmosphere is welcoming and warm, and the bar is a comfortable place to spend an evening. There's a canoe up in the rafters, if that hints at the motif, and there are no bottles on the wall behind the bar which makes it feel more homey, less like a business.

The staff seemed competent and cool. James, one of the co-owners, is quite intelligent, a fine conversationalist, and apparently business-savvy (so why did he approve the name!?), Jamie behind the bar is low-key while at the same time being friendly, attentive and welcoming, and Carole Greenwood herself, about whom many vignettes fly, came across at utterly affable and charming to me. The receptionist was also quite cordial.

The wine list is a brainchild of James, who is quite the oenophile, and it's esoteric, affordable, and a wine geek's dream considering it's relatively small size. There's no way a restaurant is going to feature wines such as this unless someone really knows what they're doing. But ultimately, I wonder if the list is more thoughtful than it is good (do I really want a Greek rosé as the only one on the list?) Still, it gets a solid B+ given its price-point, and given the knowledge of James, should quickly get even better.

The mussels in a rosemary broth are truly great, as good as mussels get, and I think I went through about two baskets of bread (very good bread) sopping up the broth. I can't imagine liking mussels much more than this. Obligatoire. It's a mistake to go and not get these.

Grilled quail with venison sausage needs to be rethought. The quail didn't sing, and it was served with a pear chutney which was overwhelming, the whole thing being in a teriyaki-like sauce. The two pieces of venison sausage in the dish were terrific, but lost in the saucing. By the way, the menu reads "Grilled quail and venison sausage," and I was expecting grilled sausage made of quail-and-venison.

The steak is a price anomaly at $29.50 (I don't think any other entrée goes higher than the mid-teens). And it's worth it, too, dry-aged and prime. Meat-wise, it's as good as it gets. As good as Charlie Palmer. Where does she get this stuff? This was a remarkable steak. It comes with excellent sweet-potato fries that you might think are in need of sea-salt, but one bite of the steak will change your mind: the coating/saucing is seeringly salty, and unfortunately I think it detracts from the otherwise mind-bendingly good steak. Let me repeat: this is a world-class steak, but given the aggressive seasoning, the sweet-potato fries are rendered as impotent as taro chips. A bit of tweaking with the peripherals, and you have the best steak dish in the city.

Jamie admirably kept his composure when I ordered the chocolate icebox cake ... and asked for a glass of milk. I haven't ordered a glass of milk in twenty years, but it just seemed so right at the moment (they didn't have any). What I was hoping for was something cakey, but what came instead was more of a ganache, and I don't think that seems appropriate for this restaurant. It was good, perfectly honest and well-executed, but probably not worth the calories for me.

So in my mind, there were dazzling highs (steak, mussels, service, atmosphere, esoteric wine), troublesome lows (quail, sauces) and not much in the middle (the icebox cake).

In summary, Buck's is a wonderful and formidable addition to the DC dining scene, and does certain things as well as anyone. I'm happily going back there soon.

Cheers,
Rocks.


dcdining.com - Restaurant Reviews - Facebook <--- LIKE Meeeeeeee! Twitter <--- FOLLOW Meeeeeeee!

If you're a member here, please Friend me personally on Facebook (send me a message with your screen name, please, so I know which member you are!)


#2 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 16 July 2005 - 11:26 AM

I had a really fantastic meal at Buck's last night. Great food, unobtrusive service and the same cozy atmosphere I had enjoyed during my one previous visit.

Even though it was a Friday night just after 8, my date and I were able to get a table for two without a wait. That's not to say Buck's is hurting for business - the bar area was pretty full and there were plenty of diners - but when we arrived, the communal table was only about 1/4 full and they happened to have two two-tops, one of which we took.

Buck's menu, refreshed daily, is concise and to the point. A salad option or two, four or so appetizer options and maybe five entrees. From what I have seen, the choices will be the epitome of seasonal each time.

I was in the mood for a glass of sauvignon blanc; in the absence of one being available by the glass, our very pleasant server steered me toward a Spanish white (sorry, but I can't recall what it was) that was crisp and enjoyable. My date had a Sierra Nevada.

We started with the day's variation on homemade mozzarella, this time served with fresh red and yellow cherry tomatoes. the restaurant's signature pesto (with finely chopped beets among other things) and olive oil. My date had the lobster roll. I tried some and it was delicious! Just enough mayo plus some fresh corn (I can't recall what else was in there).

For our entrees, I had what Buck's is calling the "Camp Plate": pork barbecue and corn pudding. OH MY. I loved this dish so much. It was essentially just a pile of pulled pork - great vinegary flavor with only a hint of sweetness and not at all sticky - next to soft lump of corn pudding. The pork had great texture (as well as the wonderful flavor I mentioned), containing a mix of tender meat and a few crispy burnt ends. I cleaned my plate, making noises of appreciation throughout (fortunately this was not a first date).

My only complaint: the corn pudding would have been even better had it been warmer. When it arrived, it was somewhere between room temperature and cool. Still, I ate every last kernel.

My date had the steaks which was also on the menu during my last visit. It is a little shocking in its size - insert your favorite Flinstone's joke here. They probably cooked it a little less than his requested medium, but he was still very happy with it. Better under than over. His steak was accompanied by a portion of bread salad which disappeared too quickly for me to taste.

[In the interest of telling you more about the menu, last night's menu offered soft shell crabs. One of our neighbors ordered this dish and it camp out looking perfect. Other options included a gigantic whole lobster, and a gigantic grilled whole fish.]

For dessert, we had coffee and shared chocolate cake (described as icebox chocolate cake IIRC), topped with fresh whipped cream. Rich and delicious.

Seating is a little tight up front where we sat. During the meal, we ended up having brief friendly exchanges with diners on each side of our table. We're comfortable with that, but as some folks are fond of saying "your mileage may vary."

The damage for this really great meal was somewhere just north of $110 before tip.

Last night's meal reminded me that I really need to get to Buck's more often.

Edited by JLK, 16 July 2005 - 11:40 AM.

Jennifer


#3 brr

brr

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 568 posts

Posted 28 July 2005 - 09:21 AM

we had a nice meal at Bucks last night

4 of us arrived at 7.30, and the place was, to put it mildly slammed - but we did manage to get a table in about 20 minutes

service was good, but a little overwhelmed - we were seated about 7.50, had our apps by about 8.10 and didn't get our entrees until about 9.05 - its nice not to feel rushed but we were STARVING by the time the entrees came out

we ordered the house rose which was good

for apps, two of us had the tomato and sweetcorn gazpacho topped with some lobster - a wonderful dish bursting with flavor - it also had great texture and a satisfying crunch as it was not liquidized/pureed with lots of tomato, corn and then some juices in the bottom of the bowl

my wife had the mozzarella w/ heiloom tomatoes and pesto - this is one of our standby dishes at bucks and it was good, particularly the tomatoes, and generosuly portioned as well - however the mozzarella did not appear to be quite as tasty as previous visits - 4th app was the iceberg wedge w/ blue cheese

for mains, two ordered lobster topped w/ a corn souffle and two ordered steak - both expensive at $34 and $33 respectively - the corn souffle was sublime, and the lobster was pronounced as 'good' by our dining companions - but at the price I don't know that they'd order it again

steak was excellent - I ordered mine medium and it came out perfectly done - nicely charred and very very tasty - its also big, filling the whole plate and served with a very small tomato and bread salad

by now it was almost 10 so we skipped dessert and sashayed off into the blessedly cool night air

bill excl tip was $211 - not cheap but with 4 entrees in the 30s thats gonna happen

they are clearly doing a roaring trade which is good to see - I also inquired about the new pizza place and was told that staff are sworn to secrecy but that it should be open by Oct/Nov and will be serving "Neo-Neapolitan" pizza

#4 Al Dente

Al Dente

    Prescott Pharmaceuticals Rep

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,056 posts

Posted 06 October 2005 - 09:13 AM

I think I've put on about five pounds in the last two weeks thanks to three nights of dining out with my foodie in-laws (the DR picnic probably contributed too). Two of those nights were spent at Buck's. I pursuaded them to go there because I had never been. They were so pleased with it, we went back a few nights later.

I got a kick out of the service at Buck's. It was like having one of your more amusing old college buddies wait on you-- they pull your leg, bust your chops, and seem to have a good time doing it. If you want to have a bit of a party with your meal, this is the place to do it.

The food was consistently well prepared and delicious. The iceburg wedge, which I normally can't get very excited about, gets your attention with applewood bacon and a perfect horseradish dressing. I'll get in trouble for saying it, but that steak is right up there with Ray's. The Bronzino had crisped skin and luxuriously moist meat. Many of their dishes, like the grilled shrimp on cheese grits, are cooked on a wood-fired grill and just the right amount of smoke comes through.

I'll be back after a few trips to the gym.

Michael Ollinger

 

Fox News: We read the chain emails your grandma gets in her inbox out loud like they were true.

 

Seafood! The Mercedes of food!


#5 brr

brr

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 568 posts

Posted 06 October 2005 - 08:03 PM

I'll get in trouble for saying it, but that steak is right up there with Ray's.

you won't get in trouble with me for saying that - luurve Bucks steak, and unlike Rays its 2 blocks from mi casa
:lol:

#6 Chris W

Chris W

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 115 posts

Posted 09 October 2005 - 09:25 AM

6 of us went to Buck's last night and had a fantastic time. James was awesome in a list minute pinch, and set us up at the communal table down at the end. My chopped liver app. was as better than my Grandfather makes and trust me that's saying something. The BBQ duck was spectacular and the mac & cheese as rich as it get's. There were raves around the table about the grilled shrimp and the steak, as well as the pork chop. I will definetly be back.
"It's good to be the king...."

#7 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 10 October 2005 - 03:41 PM

Shhh! Stop telling people Buck's is great. I like being able to get a table in this wonderful spot in my 'hood. :lol:

Jennifer


#8 Chris W

Chris W

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 115 posts

Posted 11 October 2005 - 08:27 AM

Right sorry. I promise I won't tell anyone else that Buck's is really good and makes one hell of a Makers Mark Manhattan. :lol:
"It's good to be the king...."

#9 giant shrimp

giant shrimp

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 939 posts

Posted 12 October 2005 - 08:19 AM

we don't live in the neighborhood like we used to, but the steak ($35 these days) keeps us coming back. it's my wife's favorite, and it really is up there, although i have seen diners hassling servers because they can't eat about a quarter of the giant slab that has been left untrimmed. as everyone knows, this is a prime spot for customers who are bruising for an argument, but that seems to have settled down some. for example, in the my way or the highway days, you couldn't order less than a french press pot of coffee (and it was usually so good that you wouldn't have wanted to after your first sip). today, you are allowed to end your meal with just a cup.

the farmer's salad on sunday night was a perfect expression of what's available in between seasons: a few large arugula leaves, bits of walnut and local feta, a small handful of yellow wax beans and jewel-colored tomatoes (i hesitate to call them cherry, though they were) that were perfectly round, some as small as the size of shooters, and best of all pure tomato flavor, in a dressing that was so flavorful i took some bread to it. i could have used some more. portion control is not a strong point here, but in my experience over the years i have found it works both ways: a bit less when the kitchen is afraid of running out and sometimes a whole lot more when business is winding down and there are too many leftovers.

my companion almost always goes for the iceberg lettuce with blue cheese dresssing. it does taste good, but i'm not totally in favor of indulging in just about the blandest, though crunchiest of vegetables, just because it's loaded up with cholesterol.

my entree was whole fish with california green sauce -- always a moist and fleshy branzino -- that was so welcoming i ate it down to its head and eyeballs.

for dessert i was able to order something i hadn't had before from a menu that holds on to its standard fare rather tightly and moves slowly, season by season, through the year. a double-tiered fig cake, thick cream in the center and glazed with lemon on top, a few thirds of the fruit in perfect form, providing creaminess themselves, grades of sweetness throughout, a note of salt, the texture nailed -- this is one dessert that is worth tracking down. desserts are one of the strengths at this restaurant.

service, unfortunately, was not on par with the food. the staff is friendly and the vibes are laid back despite the rumors that there is an artistic temperament at the stove, but at the outset we found ourselves in a race for the money and we weren't able to slow it down before heading into the half-way point of the dinner. i believe this was an encounter with a new server who didn't really know what he was doing because no one had bothered to adequately fill him in and there was no one to watch over his shoulder. that's my explanation for ordering, being served drinks, appetizers and entrees well within the 15-minute mark. the food itself was carried by a regular who didn't really make the best of a bad situation by delivering entrees "ready or not" style before the previous course was entirely consumed. all three courses were served "who get's what style." the server was great at repleneshing water, while dropping the ball on most other things. i didn't really mind going to the bar to request glasses of wine and they were brought to the table quickly.

i know it helped turn things around when too many tables were going empty, but i have never been sold on this fishing and camping thing. this is a beautiful room, incandescent and glowing with dangling art glass fixtures and huge, brooding blown up photographs, dark walls and corners, a communal table that's out of a movie, and the fishing lures and other crap that were thrown in to bring in the crowds feel extraneous, to say the least. prices were rolled back considerably at the outset of this reconception and have since crept back to where they were, or even higher. if you order full meals, including the steak, you probably won't get out of buck's for less than $160-170. i'm willing to pay the price, but why do i have to get sent to camp. all that comes to mind is poison ivy.

i have read that there are plans for pingpong as a concept when they take over the thai room space at the corner. bring it on, i guess.

Edited by giant shrimp, 12 October 2005 - 08:22 AM.


#10 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 17 October 2005 - 09:15 AM

If I could change one thing - well, two - about Buck's, the two things would be:

1. Take the prices down a notch. I like the food, atmosphere and location so much, but meals at Buck's are a few, uh, bucks beyond "moderate" for my present budget to the extent that it keeps me from going more often.

2. [and this is my real point] I wish they had more appetizers. I would love to be able to stop by for a drink and a snack at the bar more often, but knowing that options will be limited, I don't often suggest it for a post-work meeting point.

Jennifer


#11 jm chen

jm chen

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 817 posts

Posted 07 November 2005 - 09:45 AM

After work last Friday, we were thinking about hitting Politics & Prose for a reading and then heading over to Buck's... then we decided to skip the reading and go straight to the food. No wait, 8-ish on a Friday. Plenty of people around, dining and drinking, but we snagged a table and were glad of it.

Great service, very enjoyable. The warm red of the walls and soft light from the low-hanging fixtures make the place very inviting and it was a lovely meal.

When the food is on, it's ON. My shrimp and grits with sausage, for the most part, were delicious and tender and creamy and ahhh. The few bites I got of my companion's (immense) steak were also delicious. And the best taste of all -- fresh-made mozzarella with beets and pistachio/sun-dried tomato pesto. Ahhhhhh, wonderful.

Less successful: the iceberg wedge with creamy dressing and bacon. Seems very popular, as I know I saw at least 12 of them come out of the kitchen while we were there. But at our table, we thought there was too much sameness -- the whole quarter-head of iceberg is soaked in the rich dressing, which, although it has a nice tang of horseradish to it, loses its snap after a few bites, so every bite tastes the same. The fries that came with the steak were tastless, and back to those shrimp -- mostly delicious, but at least three bites were fishy-flavored, and when you only get three shrimp in a $22 entree, you want every bite perfect.

So, all told, a nice meal with some excellent food, but it won't be getting a regular spot on the rotation. If I still lived in the neighborhood, though, I'd probably stop by regularly for that mozzarella salad. It's the bee's knees.

Jael

Edited by jm chen, 07 November 2005 - 09:46 AM.

Jael

pop culture commentary: Intrepid Media
cooking up a storm: the SIMMER blog

#12 DC in DC

DC in DC

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 259 posts

Posted 07 November 2005 - 10:45 AM

Three of us went to Buck's on Sat. night. There was a 30 minute wait, which the host was very apologetic about. No problem-- we were in fact seated within that time frame at a nice four-top, which didn't have the "too close to your neighbor" feeling of the two-tops in the front. The dark red decor and the dim lighting created a very cozy, intimate ambiance, which we really liked.
Starters: we shared the chopped chicken liver and the mozzerella salad. Both were very good. The chicken liver was "strong," though I didn't mind that at all. There was a nice pesto accompanying the mozzerella salad, which our server gave us more bread to mop up.
Mains: Two of us had the BBQ duck with mashed sweet potato ($17). I had the fried oysters with fried green tomatoes and basil mayonaise ($20). All of us thought the food was excellent, but the portions were on the small side. My husband (who is not a big eater) thought he could have eaten two of the duck entrees, and I thought that I definitely could have done better getting the Oyster Po'boy at Hanks (which more fried oysters in the roll, at $13).
Dessert: we shared the devils food cake and my friend had poached pear with a chocolate sauce. All were excellent, without being too sweet and rich. They were out of an apple tart that my husband had been dying to try when he first saw it on the menu.
When were were done paying the bill, the manager came over and asked us very apologetically and politely if we would mind having a drink on the house at the bar because another party was about to murder him if they were not seated. We had no problem with that...and I had a very nice glass of port at the bar. I second JLK's wish for more "bar food" because the bar really is quite cozy and the bartenders fun. As I noted in the Indique thread, we sat next to Chef Vinod, who made our day by telling us that they were opening another branch in Friendship Heights-- a neighborhood sorely lacking in decent dining options that aren't too pricey (e.g. Buck's, Dahila's).

My final verdict: Great place that hit the high notes in almost everything I find important about dining out-- excellent service, food, ambiance. The only downside, as others have noted, is value. The portions are definitely a bit too small at that price point. (My husband had a bowl of cereal when he got home.)
Dora the Explorer

#13 Banco

Banco

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,209 posts

Posted 09 November 2005 - 11:24 AM

When I was growing up in Washington State, my parents and I would go on hikes around Mt. Rainier or in the rain forests of the Olympic Peninsula. Afterwards we would have lunch or dinner in one of the many rustic places that dot the roads in the area. They always had bare wood floors, exposed timbers, and the warm and comforting atmosphere so welcome after a day of hiking or chanterelle hunting. But the food sucked.

So last night I find myself in a place right in the middle of one of the more unattractive segments of Connecticut Avenue that takes me right back to those places of my childhood: Long wood tables, exposed beams, camping paraphernalia here and there, and wait staff with beards and mustaches, wearing plaid shirts and jeans.

But the food definitely did not suck. Buck's let me take a trip down memory lane while avoiding the culinary disasters of its rustic prototypes. I sat at the bar and thought, "I love this place." What I love is the witty and creative take on basic comfort-food staples. The Iceberg wedge with Maytag Blue and applewood-smoked bacon is just plain ingenious. A humble, almost trailer-park ingredient is ennobled by the chefs creativity and her insistence on top-of-the line ingredients. The dry-aged prime sirloin was a deeply charred slab of pornographic proportions with a (somewhat too) salty crust surrounding a perfectly tender medium-rare center, topped with nothing more than a few nicely cooked fries. This has to be one of the best steaks in town.

A look at the relatively extensive and varied wine list reveals another striking difference with the hearty burgundy/mountain chablis outposts of my childhood. And of course the prices are not quite the same, either.

Jamie behind the bar was in good form and fun to talk to. Although we shared stories about living on Capitol Hill, he reminded me of my brother, who has camped just about everywhere in the Northwest and has been up and down Mt. Rainier several times. In fact, next time my brother visits me in DC, I now know just where I'll take him for a great dinner. It'll be just like home, except the food won't suck.

#14 dcfoodie

dcfoodie

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 152 posts

Posted 02 January 2006 - 02:27 PM

I posted something today on my web site that I think you'll all be interested in. I received a cease and desist letter in an email for pictures I took with my camera phone while eating at Buck's.

Read more here.

The fact is, no one told me I couldn't take pictures there. I was only told that I needed permission to use them by Carole, AFTER I'd already taken them.

Thoughts? Can a restaurant tell you that you can't take pictures of food that you've paid for? It's an interesting discussion I think.
Jason Storch
dcfoodie
DCFoodies.com

"Tis no man. It is a remorseless eating machine!" -- Sea Captain

#15 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 08 January 2006 - 02:55 PM

[blatant attempt to return the Buck's discussion to food-related matters :) ]

I like Bucks (a lot). Does it make me rule-oriented? A meek conformist? I dont think so, and either way, I don't care - I just like Buck's. In spite of being a somewhat picky eater (there are real signs of improvement in that area, I have to say!), I have gotten past the small menu and the rule against menu substitutions and have simply come to love the place. You read that right - love.

I love the atmosphere, the dim lighting broken by lantern-like lighting fixtures and candles in large jars. I love the communal table (it beats the way-too-squished two-tops up front by a mile). I love the rustic and homey notes on the menu. I even love the service which, in my experience, has always been a great balance between professional and warm. Then again, I never tried to make a substitution.

My boyfriend and I were struggling to think of a place for dinner last night. It was just after 7 and we had no plan. We were toying with the idea of a 9 pm-ish movie at the Avalon near Chevy Chase Circle, but were also teetering on the brink of a night out at the bars. Almost simultaneously we said "Buck's!" which he hadn't dined at since his little brother visited in the summer. Off we went...

Business was brisk. Those of you who have sworn off the place based on the Chef's prickly and persnickety personality haven't seemingly made a dent in Buck's traffic. That is most decidedly NOT a dig; I am just glad to see a place I happen to like a lot flourish. The neighborhood needs Bucks, as well as what is supposed to be its sister spot two doors down.

With our appetizers, we each had a glass of the available verdejo (~$7.50 each, I think). My +1 had half a dozen oysters on the half shell. Bucks lost a few points by offering only East Coast variety, and our very pleasant server didnt know exactly what kind they were, but he liked them just the same. Although he offered me one, I stuck with my own delicious appetizer. The present variation on Bucks homemade mozzarella comes with the always-good pesto (beets everywhere!) plus carrots and chick peas. The humble garbanzo added a lot to this appetizer, in my opinion, and as has become my habit, I sopped up the leftover pesto with what was left of our bread basket. Yum.

For entrees, he had the spicy BBQ duck which came with fried leeks (I think) and mashed sweet potatoes. He had really, really wanted the cheese grits that came with another entre, but knew better than to ask for a substitution. For some reason, he wouldnt just order a damn side dish either (his loss, I tried). The duck was great, even though I couldnt taste much spice to it. My own entre, meatloaf with mac & cheese and simmered greens, was the winner. He took one taste and said I like the duck, but yours is so much better. And I agreed. The meatloaf, consisting of beef, pork and veal, I think, was tender and tangy. There was good onion flavor, but also a lightly sweet note I couldnt place. No matter, I was just happy to eat. The macaroni and cheese was pleasantly gooey with a crispy crust. I didnt get many of the greens they were quickly stolen from my plate.

In order to make the movie, we asked for a piece of the pineapple upside down cake to go. We opened it at home post-flick and it was the lone disappointment of the meal. I partly blame the to-go factor, but even so, I feel like my own recipe is better. The cake tasted lardy, not buttery, and there was whipped cream on it which I found odd. At the price (which I think was a staggering $9, but dont hold me to that), it tasted even worse. Sorry Chef.

Still, this is a great spot for me, a place I look forward to visiting. Its not a perfect restaurant, but Im very glad to have it nearby.

Jennifer


#16 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 30 January 2006 - 05:53 PM

After major Saturday night indecision, +1 and I headed to Buck's for dinner. It was later than I've ever been there (~9:30, 9:45) and I suppose we suffered a little for that fact.

We started at the bar where we had a quick chat with the affable Jamie and his colleague whose name I didn't catch. By the time we were taking our first sips of wine, the host stopped by to tell us that our table was ready.

I ordered pretty much the meal I had last visit (see above), but sadly, they were out of the pesto that accompanies the mozzarella. :lol: I decided to skip straight to the glazed meatloaf with mac & cheese and greens. +1 kept to his appetizer from last time, half a dozen oysters on the half shell, and also ordered the delicious meatloaf.

Unfortunately his oysters came out sort of warm, not served atop the usual crushed ice. He ate a few, but couldn't finish the six. Our server, picking up that something was amiss, asked about them and upon hearing his answer, removed them from the bill with zero fuss. Our meatloaf plates arrived, looking a little...well, sloppy. The greens were plopped atop the meatloaf, and overall, the portion size of each component was smaller than previously experienced. Oh well. No biggie. That meatloaf sure tastes good--the glaze is perceptible, but not overwhelming or cloying in its sweetness.

After getting burned somewhat by the $9 pineapple upside down cake last time and generally feeling just full enough, we passed on dessert.

Jennifer


#17 giant shrimp

giant shrimp

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 939 posts

Posted 30 January 2006 - 06:30 PM

After getting burned somewhat by the $9 pineapple upside down cake last time and generally feeling just full enough, we passed on dessert.

we beat you by an hour or two on saturday night following an appearance next door by julian barnes. (he said his hotel room came with a goldfish and a card by the bowl that said, "hello, my name is (fill in the blank) dave," and he wondered if the name got changed for each guest.) my serving of meatloaf was fortifying, to say the least. and portions of pinepaple upside down cake and coconut cake were beyond generous. the former is not exactly the traditional recipe and may disappoint those who have grown accustomed to the version at colorado kitchen (which is superior). but the coconut cake demonstrates that this is one of the best cake-baking kitchens in the city hands down, perfect in texture with an adept use of salt. (when it comes to chocolate, the flour version here, to my taste, is superior to the flour-less, unless you are drawn to the gooey, as many are.) and they are not afraid to lather on the whipped cream. don't be surprised to encounter small mounds of it. anyway, despite our capacious, pickwickian appetites, we retired from our desserts leaving behind enough crumbs to feed a long line of honey ants. outside, a weird unseasonal warmth lingered along connecticut avenue as we stumbled past, before coming to a corner, the almost imperceptibly maddening racket of ping pong balls from a darkened doorway where the future wobbled in and out of focus and the street lighting clung to our faces no matter how we turned.

#18 DonRocks

DonRocks

    leviathan

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,172 posts

Posted 30 January 2006 - 06:40 PM

Our meatloaf plates arrived, looking a little...well, sloppy. The greens were plopped atop the meatloaf, and overall, the portion size of each component was smaller than previously experienced. Oh well. No biggie. That meatloaf sure tastes good--the glaze is perceptible, but not overwhelming or cloying in its sweetness.

It almost seems like they pan-fry it in bacon fat after they cut it. It's a great meatloaf - I had it a couple weeks ago.

Also, the fried oysters (a $21 entree) were the best fried oysters I've ever had in my life, anywhere. It was one of the best single dishes I've had in months.

I'm usually recognized at Buck's these days - my portion of meatloaf was quite large, and the number of fried oysters was, erm, generous - but I tipped accordingly, and portion sizes aside, I've had fabulous food on three out of my last four visits, some of the best cooking in town.

Cheers,
Rocks

dcdining.com - Restaurant Reviews - Facebook <--- LIKE Meeeeeeee! Twitter <--- FOLLOW Meeeeeeee!

If you're a member here, please Friend me personally on Facebook (send me a message with your screen name, please, so I know which member you are!)


#19 ScotteeM

ScotteeM

    Foie Gras

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,159 posts

Posted 30 January 2006 - 11:24 PM

and portion sizes aside, I've had fabulous food on three out of my last four visits, some of the best cooking in town.

Where are the pictures, Rocks? We need visuals! :lol:

Dona Animella


#20 The Delicious

The Delicious

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 282 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 09:15 AM

It always stuns me when people say how great this place is, because I probably had my worst meal of all time in Washington at this place. Now granted, I've only been once, but it was so bad, top to bottom, that I couldn't imagine going back for another try. The service was some of the worst I've ever had. The prices were outrageous...something like $8 for 2 deviled eggs, and about the same for half a head of lettuce and blue cheese!?!? Both my father and father-in-law got the steak, paid around $30-40 for it, and both thought it was terrible. In fact, it was a terrible cut, mostly gristle, and not cooked according to their wishes. The shrimp dish, which was in the mid-to-upper 20s had 4 shrimp, not jumbo, and was average at best. Everything was overpriced and underwhelming. It's become a runing joke in my family that when we speak of a terrible meal, we refer to Buck's.

#21 cjsadler

cjsadler

    leviathan

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,288 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 11:02 AM

The prices were outrageous...something like $8 for 2 deviled eggs

You got it right-- it was $8 for 2 deviled eggs. I ordered them to see if they'd do something interesting with them, but it was plain deviled eggs (can't have a photo of that getting out :lol: ).

Chris Sadler


#22 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:23 PM

Still, like you said, one visit really isn't enough to judge a restaurant by. If so, I never would have returned to Palena which is now a favorite. Nobody is saying that the prices aren't on the high side, but much of what comes out of the kitchen is excellent.

Jennifer


#23 qwertyy

qwertyy

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,326 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:27 PM

Still, like you said, one visit really isn't enough to judge a restaurant by.  If so, I never would have returned to Palena which is now a favorite.  Nobody is saying that the prices aren't on the high side, but much of what comes out of the kitchen is excellent.

I think one visit may not be enough to judge a well-reviewed restaurant by, but a mixed bag like Buck's, I'm just not willing to drop the dough...

#24 mhberk

mhberk

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 289 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:39 PM

I refuse to go to a Carole Greenwood restaurant!!

Edited by mhberk, 31 January 2006 - 12:42 PM.

(Sitting for lamb chops)

Lamb: Ple-e-e-se Li-i-i-sa I thought you lo-o-o-oved me, lo-o-o-oved me
Marge: Whats Wrong Lisa? Can't get enough lamb chops?
Lisa: I can't eat this, I can't eat a poor little lamb.
Homer: Lisa get a hold yourself!! That is lamb, not A lamb.

#25 brr

brr

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 568 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:43 PM

I think one visit may not be enough to judge a well-reviewed restaurant by, but a mixed bag like Buck's, I'm just not willing to drop the dough...

the reviews on page 1 of the thread are uniformly positive (with the exception of the one on the bottom) with lots of use of words like great, delicious, the best etc etc by a variety of different posters....I would consider that well-reviewed (ignoring the whole photo brouhaha)

yes, its expensive, and yes, she's a bit of a diva/inflexible/whatever you want to call it....but to say it hasn't been well-reviewed for the food, not only by DR.com'ers but other critics and other boards is a little unfair.....people are perfectly entitled not to go there because of the bad press.....just means more good food for those who do! :lol:

Edited by brr, 31 January 2006 - 12:44 PM.


#26 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:45 PM

By all means, haters can stay away. :lol: More room for me.

Jennifer


#27 mhberk

mhberk

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 289 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 01:01 PM

the reviews on page 1 of the thread are uniformly positive (with the exception of the one on the bottom) with lots of use of words like great, delicious, the best etc etc by a variety of different posters....I would consider that well-reviewed (ignoring the whole photo brouhaha)

yes, its expensive, and yes, she's a bit of a diva/inflexible/whatever you want to call it....but to say it hasn't been well-reviewed for the food, not only by DR.com'ers but other critics and other boards is a little unfair.....people are perfectly entitled not to go there because of the bad press.....just means more good food for those who do!  :lol:

My reason for not going has nothing to do with the food or the press. I have never been, so I couldn't comment one way or the other. I just refuse to give her my business based on my one and only attempt to go there.

Besides, why would I go to Buck's when I could drive about 5 more minutes to Cleveland Park?
(Sitting for lamb chops)

Lamb: Ple-e-e-se Li-i-i-sa I thought you lo-o-o-oved me, lo-o-o-oved me
Marge: Whats Wrong Lisa? Can't get enough lamb chops?
Lisa: I can't eat this, I can't eat a poor little lamb.
Homer: Lisa get a hold yourself!! That is lamb, not A lamb.

#28 qwertyy

qwertyy

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,326 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 01:08 PM

the reviews on page 1 of the thread are uniformly positive (with the exception of the one on the bottom) with lots of use of words like great, delicious, the best etc etc by a variety of different posters....I would consider that well-reviewed (ignoring the whole photo brouhaha)

yes, its expensive, and yes, she's a bit of a diva/inflexible/whatever you want to call it....but to say it hasn't been well-reviewed for the food, not only by DR.com'ers but other critics and other boards is a little unfair.....people are perfectly entitled not to go there because of the bad press.....just means more good food for those who do!  :lol:

It's generally accepted to include in a summary of a night at Buck's that "we went in completely expecting to pay an arm and a leg for awful, authoritarian service..."

That is NOT a well-reviewed restaurant.

#29 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 01:22 PM

Your call, of course. But there's nothing comparable with respect to style in Cleveland Park.

My reason for not going has nothing to do with the food or the press.  I have never been, so I couldn't comment one way or the other.  I just refuse to give her my business based on my one and only attempt to go there. 

Besides, why would I go to Buck's when I could drive about 5 more minutes to Cleveland Park?


Jennifer


#30 brr

brr

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 568 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 01:33 PM

It's generally accepted to include in a summary of a night at Buck's that "we went in completely expecting to pay an arm and a leg for awful, authoritarian service..."

That is NOT a well-reviewed restaurant.

You're perfectly entitled to not want to go there, but again in this thread about Bucks I fail to see these generally accepted terms regarding awful service...

We could go back and forth on this all day long, but she makes very good, sometimes great food that is generally very well reviewed.....as this thread, with one or two exceptions abundantly demonstrates...

#31 mhberk

mhberk

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 289 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 01:35 PM

Your call, of course.  But there's nothing comparable with respect to style in Cleveland Park.

"Style"? As far as what? Are you talking about the whole "camping" and "hunting" atmosphere?

In all honesty, I would MUCH rather go to Palena, Indique, Ardeo, Sorriso, Dino's or Lavandou. I'd even rather drive a little farther for Lebanese Taverna. Even Palena, as poor as their service is, takes full responsibility when they screw up and then does what ever they can to make it up! The post I made on EG was the PG version of what I originally wrote about that place. You wouldn't believe the amount of PMs I received agreeing with what I had originally wrote.

My point is, is that there are FAR too many (BETTER) restaurants in the DC area to waste your time on piss poor customer service! And again, I have never tasted their food, so I cannot comment on that.
(Sitting for lamb chops)

Lamb: Ple-e-e-se Li-i-i-sa I thought you lo-o-o-oved me, lo-o-o-oved me
Marge: Whats Wrong Lisa? Can't get enough lamb chops?
Lisa: I can't eat this, I can't eat a poor little lamb.
Homer: Lisa get a hold yourself!! That is lamb, not A lamb.

#32 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 02:54 PM

I'm talking about the style of cooking, the style of presentation, the wine list, the atmosphere, the service, all of it collectively.

How about we agree to disagree? If you ever change your mind and actually dine at Buck's, then I'd be glad to revisit the discussion.

Jennifer


#33 mhberk

mhberk

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 289 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 03:44 PM

I'm talking about the style of cooking, the style of presentation, the wine list, the atmosphere, the service, all of it collectively.

How about we agree to disagree? If you ever change your mind and actually dine at Buck's, then I'd be glad to revisit the discussion.

I'm not disagreeing with you. If you feel that I am, then I apologize. I'm just stating that I will not go there. And it is for a reason that is completely different than the reasons for you WANTING to go there. Again, I can't comment on "style of cooking, the style of presentation, the wine list, the atmosphere". I can, however, comment on "the service" and that is why I choose not to make another attempt to go there.

Even though I have never stepped foot in Buck's, I am willing to bet that Palena (just 5 minutes past Buck's if headed towards the city in Cleveland Park), is MORE worthy of my money for all those reasons you listed. Unfortunately, I can't be proven wrong by my own experiences.

I'm not telling you or anyone else not to go there. I'm simply sharing a negative experience I had that I am not willing to over look!

Let me share a lesson in customer service: For my sister's anniversary, she (and my brother-in-law) went to Restaurant Eve. I called ahead (that day) and told the woman I spoke with that I would like to purchase a wine paring to go with the tasting menu. I made the purchase, but I found out later that week that the GC was never presented to them. When I called Restaurant Eve to find out why it was never given to them, the woman apologized over and over again (instead of blaming me!). She then, not only sent my sister the $70 GC that was never presented, but she sent me a $70 GC as well! She never had to check with a manager to see if it was OK, she just did it! I can only assume (from the PMs I recieved on EG after I wrote my experience) that Carole Greenwood would rather do without customers (and deal with what they will share with others) than taking some responsibility!
(Sitting for lamb chops)

Lamb: Ple-e-e-se Li-i-i-sa I thought you lo-o-o-oved me, lo-o-o-oved me
Marge: Whats Wrong Lisa? Can't get enough lamb chops?
Lisa: I can't eat this, I can't eat a poor little lamb.
Homer: Lisa get a hold yourself!! That is lamb, not A lamb.

#34 hungry prof

hungry prof

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 350 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 04:48 PM

Well, put me in the negative Buck's experience column. My wife and I went there once. The food was good (but not great), overpriced, and limited in terms of selections (we were there mid-evening and they were out of half the entrees on an already short menu).

The service was what really turned us off. After waiting for our food for a LONG time, I looked around the room only to realize that everybody else in the dining room was looking around to see if there was any sign of their food. One of those surreal restaurant moments during which everybody simultaneously realizes that they are in a sinking ship together.

Would I go again? Not likely, and probably only if somebody else was paying. My wife and I are in the category of being able to eat out at nice restaurants occasionally (once every two weeks maybe), but we don't have the financial resources to eat at a place like Buck's a lot. Unfortunately, that means we can be pretty harsh and judgmental. There are so many restaurants that we want to try in this city that I just can't imagine wanting to go back to Buck's anytime soon (as opposed to Palena, for example, which I would and have gone back to a few times).

#35 porcupine

porcupine

    ill-tempered sea bass

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,914 posts

Posted 31 January 2006 - 05:08 PM

You never get a second chance to make a first impression.

To be fair, though, the only time I ever really like mussels (after many, many tastes) was at Greenwood's. Damn those were good.

Elizabeth Miller
fast cars, slow food

http://elizaberryblog.wordpress.com/


#36 JLK

JLK

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,819 posts

Posted 03 February 2006 - 05:09 PM

Can anyone PM me a link to the Washingtonian feature re: Buck's?

Jennifer


#37 Banco

Banco

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,209 posts

Posted 16 February 2006 - 04:03 PM

A couple days ago I was in Buck's for an early dinner. They had a braised barbecue duck dish that was new on the menu since I was there last. It was excellent. The duck (leg and thigh) was succulent and tender from a long braise, and it had fully absorbed the flavors of a wonderful barbecue sauce that had strong notes of cumin and cinnamon but still packed a hot and vinegary kick.

I don't get the whole "art" thing that the chef apparently ascribes to her food. The duck, along with the sides of mac and cheese and collard greens, was well prepared, but art it isnt. I mean no harm in saying that; craft and art are both noble things.

Another tempting item was wood-grilled lobster, but at $35 (and just the tail) I shied away--at least for now.

#38 brr

brr

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 568 posts

Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:45 PM

Is it time for another p***ing match about Buck's? :angry:

We took some friends there on Sat night as a wedding gift. We thought the monsoonish conditions would have kept people at home - unfortunately it seemed to have driven people out of the house - at 7 there was a 60-90 minute wait for a table :) (in fairness, the large communal table was filled with a large group who basically stayed there the whole night)

oh yeah, the food....well the menu is still essentially the same - I had my first softies of the year (from Georgia I believe) and they were tasty and good - mrs brr had the grilled fish (branzino) and thought it was good also

sadly, they were out of the rhubard pie for dessert so we split two homey, chocolately things for dessert.......

our server was a delight

still no word on the new pizza place though......

#39 brr

brr

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 568 posts

Posted 27 April 2006 - 02:55 PM

Yes, they were.

Say hi next time.

to think I was in the presence of greatness and had no idea! :)

#40 Banco

Banco

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,209 posts

Posted 27 April 2006 - 03:16 PM

I was there this Tuesday. Crispy rabbit was tender, juicy, and crispy as promised. Cheesy grits were a nice accompaniment with deep flavor and just the right amount of grainy mouthfeel. House-made mozzarella with asparagus was fresh and zesty with garlicky pesto. I find the menu overpriced, but given the paucity of alternatives in the area perhaps that's just good old supply-and-demand for you--especially if they have such long waits for dinner as brr describes.

I got the impression, from a reliable source, that the pizza place is a long way off indeed.

#41 MBK

MBK

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 436 posts

Posted 27 June 2006 - 10:44 PM

So I'm waiting for the bus to head up Connecticut to Buck's. In the rain. Leaving behind my condo with its leaky ceiling, my workday with its conflict and confusion, my poor cat who really would've liked an escape from the rainforest conditions of our living space. And for a second, I wonder if it really makes sense to shlep all the way up to Buck's on a night like tonight. "Wouldn't it be easier to stay home and watch a DVD," I think to myself. "Mike would understand if I canceled... what with the leaky ceiling and all... wouldn't he?"

And then the bus comes, and I clamber aboard, deciding I deserve a night out after the sleepless nights of flood watch I've been on of late. (Presumably, the roofers did something about the leak problem today. Presumably.)

I arrive at Buck's and take a seat at the bar. (Mike has already called with a delay of his own. Apparently cabs are hard to flag down during the Deluge of '06...) The friendly bartender and I strike up a conversation, and I select a glass of Kir Yianni rose. It's summer, goddamit, and I want a summer wine. Even if it is a nightmare outside. We continue chatting as Mike texts his whereabouts. "Hitting traffic around Dupont." "Fifteen minutes away, I promise." My bartender friend offers suggestions about the menu ("it's all good") as the friendly gentleman next to me lectures me on fascism in America today. Mike arrives.

And if the generous glass plus of rose didn't already melt away the stress of the week (it did), our meal certainly gave me the jump-start I needed in the middle of a week that started out on the wrong foot. We shared a starter of mozzarella and tomatoes, with greens, local beans, and a pistachio pesto that was fresh and light and delicious and summery (and yes, I'm a sucker for anything with pistachios), as well as the fried green tomatoes, which were not quite as tender or flavorful as I would have hoped. And then our mains. The softshell crab -- two perfectly juicy and crispy crabs, resting on mounds of potato salad and coleslaw. I don't think I ceded a bite, which is okay, because I barely got a taste of the perfectly cooked to medium rare steak. And although we didn't really need it, a slice of the chocolate icebox cake was a decadent and perfect ending to the night.

No. The perfect ending to the night was returning home to find no leaky ceiling. Maybe... just maybe... the roofers did their job. Or maybe I'll wake up in the morning to find it was just a dream, a mozzarella and softshell and chocolate cake-inspired dream. Either way, it was a good night.
DC Food for Thought

*****

If you are lucky enough to have lived in Paris as a young man, then wherever you go for the rest of your life, it stays with you, for Paris is a moveable feast.

#42 giant shrimp

giant shrimp

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 939 posts

Posted 13 July 2006 - 08:25 AM

the spillover from t.c. boyle is maybe four.

but first this public service message, instigated by the shockingly painful demise of a leading character in the final pages of drop city: you can, apparently, take yourself out, entirely, with frozen vodka or other alcoholic libations, although we are still not entirely certain if this is apt to happen in your living room. the fictional death occurred outdoors in frozen alaskan wilderness. the author, reading the mind of a questioner from the audience at politics and prose, said that people have gone this way, the alcohol devastating the throat. i have viewed on television somewhere how a swallowed live baby octupus defends itself with its tentacles, so know to decline the opportunity if i ever run into it, say, at a sushi establishment attempting to rise above the competition, and now i also know that i am perhaps lucky to be alive following frozen vodka shots chugged long ago in the company of a woman who claimed polenta was her favorite food during childhood while she was reaching into the freezer. if this ever comes up again, i will limit myself to short sips from the rim of the glass, although i am counting on further expertise from the members of this board and someone who will say it ain't necessarily so.

there is corn all over the menu at buck's this week. they are having a small festival with it. corn is in the gazpacho and there is corn in the chile rellenos. the poblanos, an appetizer, are just about as healthy as they can be, encased in the barest coating of crunchy, seemingly eggless meal, sitting by a pool of tomatillo salsa. they have been stuffed with a judicious amount of cheese and corn, nothing explosive, and it is the taste of the peppers, their faint smokiness and gently roasted flesh, that prevails and shines. $14 buys two of them and last night, at least, the kitchen, as it does so reliably with so many things, ran out fairly early.

some humdrum people complain about this restaurant's limited menu, but that has never been a problem for us, and on the two summer standards we ordered, we found different touches from before. soft crabs from virginia came with corn and a slaw of pickled onions. and crispy oysters were on a plate of pickled vegetables, including a whole carrot.

for a generous dollop of the best whipped cream around, i ordered the chocolate icebox cake, which is less my speed than the traditional flour cakes you encounter here on lucky nights, and maybe should have branched out to the cherry and vanilla ice cream. still, it was good. the melon and lime ices were outstanding.

we must have behaved pretty well at camp yesterday, because our meal was definitely rewarding.

we were in such a rush to hail a cab before we became trendy robbery, sexual assault or murder victims that we entirely forgot to check out what was going on with the pingpong restaurant a skip away.

#43 giant shrimp

giant shrimp

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 939 posts

Posted 07 March 2007 - 10:34 AM

William vollmann in his weird, earnest way was rounding up customers to go out for a drink following his reading last night at politics and prose, but since the book was on conversations with the poor, in the tradition of let us now praise famous men, those who signed up for the excursion most likely ended up in a dive. All I know is he wasnt at bucks, which in a way is too bad. although it cannot be denied that the dining experience here is for an elite bunch of campers, the premises are ideal for bouncing around some of the paranoid insights on class, politics and the criminal mind that easily arise from exposure to even a few pages of the authors strangely subversive and damaged prose. the large blow-ups on the wall above the bar, and I was seated looking directly at them, might just as well come from the landscape of Kazakhstan he describes, more desperate than borats village, where the nurses have good reason for not opening up to a reporter about the sulfur extraction from the local oil refinery that is making the whole town anemic. Besides, it may not be quite up to san franciscos tenderloin, but doesnt bucks provide the best darkness of any restaurant around, with campfire glow in the glass pendulums breaking through the murk, inspiring ghost tales, although your tablemates at the communal table are more likely discussing aspects of business, the wine, the food, shoe buckles, agents, an mba, the cape, galleries, the baby sitter, infidelity?

The food was pretty good last night at bucks too, which is a shame for vollmann, who looks these days like hes sustaining himself on more than beer. The swell of the belly is still there, but he has grown thick all over, intrepid and tenacious on great stores of corn and beef. Of course, one can only imagine the diet that has led to such corpulence, but its a safe bet that he could easily chomp his way through this kitchens killer steak without even noticing the gristly parts that some people like to complain about. Its hard to pinpoint how the authors meal might have been memorable, though, because my sense is that here is a man who remembers everything.

An almost-spring vegetable soup ($7) might have been the best thing on the menu last night. It was a bowl of heartiness, with the surest harbinger of green suggested by a garnish of watercress, the broth itself thickened with lentils, minced onion, a fine dice of something starchy, and a fresh slice of toasted, lightly cheesed bread melting into it. (the bread in the soup was far better than the bread in the basket, which was hard.) an invigorating, clear flavor was imbued with smoke and bacon, placing an assured accent on late winter. This is a dish that makes you think you might actually miss the season once its gone.

A leg of duck ($15) arrives with a full spray of cleansing watercress and a rich pool of cheese grits that help sop up a faintly sweet barbecue sauce that reminds your tongue of pineapple. (I have given up asking the servers around here about ingredients. There are some things they will tell you, but many more they will not, such as how you taste meat when there is no meat in it. The recipes are closely guarded, perhaps rightly so.) this is a terrific piece of meat, so tender you have no problem eating it all the way down to the bone.

A rhubarb and green apple pie sure sounded good on the menu, but by the time it came to order dessert, the selection was down to one: chocolate cake ($9). The serving was big and bold, anointed generously with whipped cream and chocolate sauce, crusty around the edges and almost molten inside, a reliably good choice even if it wasnt your first.

(it was quite an adult evening, but back home on television the feeling is the city is in for some talcum powdering in the morning.)

#44 DonRocks

DonRocks

    leviathan

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,172 posts

Posted 12 June 2007 - 03:07 PM

But the one they're serving now at Buck's Fishing and Camping is the most wonderful conduit for Maytag Blue - and the lettuce itself is good, too.

i have looked down my nose every time my wife orders this at buck's and never really tasted it -- until last weekend, and i could see the merit in it, with a kick of horseradish in the dressing. the portion is whopping and it takes a long time to eat, however, and i could have easily finished just about every appetizer on the short menu in the time it took her to polish this off -- including one of the best versions of gazpacho around, chopped more coarsely than ordinarily found, with less vegetable juice released, and speckled with vibrant beets and basil.

FWIW, I ordered this salad after the BBQ Duck (*), having it as a de facto cheese course.

(*) a very tasty BBQ Duck, two legs-worth, slathered in sauce, served with a trio of picnic salads (cole slaw, potato salad, sweet-pea salad) and remarkably only $15 for an entree portion. As for the Very Good Chocolate Cake ... it's a diet-killer, that's for sure: One slice weighs about eighteen pounds.

dcdining.com - Restaurant Reviews - Facebook <--- LIKE Meeeeeeee! Twitter <--- FOLLOW Meeeeeeee!

If you're a member here, please Friend me personally on Facebook (send me a message with your screen name, please, so I know which member you are!)


#45 Scooter

Scooter

    Silver

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 07 July 2007 - 12:06 PM

Looking at my piles of laundry on a Friday evening, empty pantry, and with the significant other out of town, I decided to walk up Connecticut Avenue in search of a treat. I ended up at the bar at Buck's. Great Choice!

Started with a glass of the Del Maso Gambellara Gargenega, one of my faves from my days at Palena and the "World Famous Gazpacho". This was summer in a bowl! A generous helping of baby heirloom tomatoes, fresh corn taken right off the cob, red onion, fresh torn basil and a vinegary twang! All this topped with perfectly cooked lobster that added just the right amount of richness to counter the acid in the dish.

At the bartenders urging (she wasn't letting me out of there without them) I had the soft shells as my main. Perfectly crisp in their tempura coating and wonderfully juicy inside.

No room for dessert, but I'm not complaining... A damn fine meal!

#46 ALB

ALB

    ventworm

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 139 posts

Posted 18 September 2007 - 12:32 PM

Hi everyone-
I would love your opinion on something. After services for the holidays last week, my family and I ate dinner at Bucks Fishing and Camping. We arrived around 7:30, and soon after ordered appetizers and our main courses. The appetizer came out in about 10 minutes, but after that it was over 45 minutes before our main courses arrived.

My family was upset, because rarely do they venture into the city for dinner. and its not the most expensive restaurant in the world, the $46 steak that non seafood eating sister ordered did give them pause (the only non seafood main on the menu). My parents are not confrontational, so they did not complain to a manager however they did enthusiastically agree with the server when she paused to say- yes its been a while, food should be out soon.

I didn't want to be the complainer, but my family was upset. I left it to my parents to say something- which they did not. So my question is- what would you do? Would you ask for a manager, or voice your unhappiness? We got our main courses at about 8:50.

I'm interested in what you all would do.
Thanks.

Clarification edit** It was wednesday night. the restaurant was about half full. not crowded at all.

#47 Waitman

Waitman

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,964 posts

Posted 18 September 2007 - 01:07 PM

First, I would resolve never to eat dinner at a popular restaurant at 7:30 again. Not that there's any excuse for a 45 minute wait, but hitting any place -- especially a smaller place -- at 7:30 is asking for trouble.

Second, I would ask for the manager and in a non-confrontational way (and without asking for anything to be comped) suggest that there's been an unreasonably long wait. Probably won't get you anything other than a sincere apology, possibly an explanation, and maybe a word to the chef in hopes of speeding your meal. But that should be enough, because you're a reasonable guy, right?

I have found that drinking rapidly on an empty stomach and then getting pissy with the Maitre d' doesn't necessarily do much good (this was not Bucks). :angry:

"Don't go braggin' about how cool and clean your kitchen is. 'Caus if your kitchen's so cool and clean, ain't nothin' cookin'!"

-- Jesse Jackson


#48 Bags

Bags

    clam

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 37 posts

Posted 18 September 2007 - 02:42 PM

$46 steak

wow. I have never been to Buck's, but it's been on my list of places to try for a while now. I'd heard it was pricey, but I didn't realize we were talking mid-40s entrees. Is this an anomaly? And more interestingly, I see that in Rocks' first post in this thread, the steak dish was $29.50. Even given that the original post was from 2003-2004, that seems like an excessive cost increase. Has Buck's morphed from an affordable neighborhood place (mid-teens entrees per Rocks) to an overpriced special occasion place? I'm just trying to understand the place so I'll know what to expect.

[and as an aside, I assume (hope?) Waitman's comment about avoiding a restaurant at 7:30 was tonge-in-cheek? Otherwise, that's one of the more asinine things I've heard. I'm "asking for trouble" if I go to a restaurant at prime dining time? No-- I should expect any competent restaurant to be able to serve me dinner during dinnertime.]

#49 giant shrimp

giant shrimp

    hammerhead

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 939 posts

Posted 18 September 2007 - 03:06 PM

wow. I have never been to Buck's, but it's been on my list of places to try for a while now. I'd heard it was pricey, but I didn't realize we were talking mid-40s entrees. Is this an anomaly? And more interestingly, I see that in Rocks' first post in this thread, the steak dish was $29.50. Even given that the original post was from 2003-2004, that seems like an excessive cost increase. Has Buck's morphed from an affordable neighborhood place (mid-teens entrees per Rocks) to an overpriced special occasion place? I'm just trying to understand the place so I'll know what to expect.

[and as an aside, I assume (hope?) Waitman's comment about avoiding a restaurant at 7:30 was tonge-in-cheek? Otherwise, that's one of the more asinine things I've heard. I'm "asking for trouble" if I go to a restaurant at prime dining time? No-- I should expect any competent restaurant to be able to serve me dinner during dinnertime.]

the steak, one of the best around, is the most expensive thing on the menu, and big enough for two people to share. i had good and crunchy fried chicken there recently, picnic style with green beans and potato salad ($19). a gazpacho of prime local ingredients was $8, fried green tomatoes almost as good as where we know to find them a two hour drive into virginia were $9. desserts were $9. glasses of wine start in the $6.50 range.

this has always been a moderately expensive restaurant, more so before it was reinveted, but won't break the bank. we have never encountered any memorable service problems here. it can get crowded at prime time, and we have found that it's better to arrive earlier than later if you want to be able to choose from everything on a fairly small menu. the kitchen can run out of a few things on a busy night.

#50 Waitman

Waitman

    leviathan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,964 posts

Posted 18 September 2007 - 03:07 PM

wow. I have never been to Buck's, but it's been on my list of places to try for a while now. I'd heard it was pricey, but I didn't realize we were talking mid-40s entrees. Is this an anomaly? And more interestingly, I see that in Rocks' first post in this thread, the steak dish was $29.50. Even given that the original post was from 2003-2004, that seems like an excessive cost increase. Has Buck's morphed from an affordable neighborhood place (mid-teens entrees per Rocks) to an overpriced special occasion place? I'm just trying to understand the place so I'll know what to expect.

[and as an aside, I assume (hope?) Waitman's comment about avoiding a restaurant at 7:30 was tonge-in-cheek? Otherwise, that's one of the more asinine things I've heard. I'm "asking for trouble" if I go to a restaurant at prime dining time? No-- I should expect any competent restaurant to be able to serve me dinner during dinnertime.]

I expect any competent department store to be able to sell me a gift, but I try to avoid them the week before Christmas. I expect the Bay Bridge to be able to carry my car, but I don't show up at 5PM July 3rd and expect to breeze through. And I expect a competent restaurant to be able to serve me dinner at "dinnertime" (is 7:30 federally mandated or something? most restaurants and people I know have a more flexible window), but I'm not asinine enough to show up at the peak of the rush and expect the same odds of a consistently smooth, relaxing dinner as I would get if I showed up earlier or later. Not that that I'd necessarily expect a problem -- though I would expect everyone from the busboy to the bartender to more stressed and hurried -- but I'm a lot less surprised.

"Don't go braggin' about how cool and clean your kitchen is. 'Caus if your kitchen's so cool and clean, ain't nothin' cookin'!"

-- Jesse Jackson






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Chevy Chase DC, American, Southern

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users