You can still smoke cigars at Shelly's http://www.shellysdc.com/No. Perhaps you haven't heard about a new law in Washington?
Shelly's Back Room, 13th & F Streets NW
#1
Posted 11 January 2007 - 08:31 AM
#2
Posted 11 January 2007 - 10:53 AM
#3
Posted 11 January 2007 - 11:38 AM
Leading Proprietor of Snark
#4
Posted 11 January 2007 - 02:40 PM
I would characterize the food as basic bar food. Great wings and burgers. I've never had anything beyond the bar food. I go to sit on the sofas or easy chairs and smoke a cigar and sip a single malt.Anyone know how the food is? I'm considering leasing a humidor there, but haven't ever eaten there.
#5
Posted 11 January 2007 - 02:45 PM
My understanding is that the new DC smoking ban is crafted in such a way that Shelly's is the only establishment in town where smoking is permitted.
#6
Posted 11 January 2007 - 03:59 PM
Apparantly, Shelly's can meet the 10% test by including the revenue from renting on-site humidors. Here is a link to the Act.a restaurant, tavern, brew pub, club, or nightclub that generates 10% or more of its total annual revenue from the on-site sale of tobacco products, excluding sales from vending machines, or the rental of on-site humidors.
So, if you go into Shelly's make sure you buy a cigar from them, to help them remain "unique."
PS: I do not know if Ozio can meet the test. I doubt it because they don't have humidors for rent.
#7
Posted 11 January 2007 - 04:51 PM
#8
Posted 11 March 2007 - 10:31 PM
Dave "we smoke em in the street in SF" Batista
manager and aspiring wine guru
market street grill, hotel whitcomb
people's republic of san francisco
#9
Posted 12 March 2007 - 07:48 AM
Boulevardier
Bon Vivant
Besotted
Epistemological Optimist
"I would like to take you seriously, but to do so would affront your intelligence."
"You too can have the soothing feeling of nature's own baby-soft wool being pulled over your resting eyes." - Herb Block
#10
Posted 13 March 2007 - 01:34 PM
"Tobacco bars" are not subject to the smoking ban. The DC implementing legislation defines a "tobacco bar" as:Apparantly, Shelly's can meet the 10% test by including the revenue from renting on-site humidors. Here is a link to the Act.
So, if you go into Shelly's make sure you buy a cigar from them, to help them remain "unique."
PS: I do not know if Ozio can meet the test. I doubt it because they don't have humidors for rent.
I believe Ozio's is exempt - I was there a few weeks a go and there was a lot of smoking going on. The act exempts "tabacco bars" that are defined as receiving 10% or more of their annual revenue from on-site sale of tabacco products (excluding from vending machines) - not only the rental of on-site humidors.
Now, has anyone been to Aroma recently? Are they exempt? I don't believe so since they had stopped selling cigars a while back.
#11
Posted 13 March 2007 - 01:57 PM
Tobacco Sales + humidor rental revenue > 10% --> exempt tobacco bar
Tobacco Sales + humidor rental revenue < 10% --> covered by smoking ban
Establishments that do not have humidor rental revenue will have a harder time getting over the 10% threshold because they have to rely solely on tobacco sales. Ozio, because it does not have humidors, will have a harder time than Shelley's in meeting the 10% test. Also, the mayor has discretion to grant an exemption.
#12
Posted 13 March 2007 - 02:01 PM
Just to be clear:
Tobacco Sales + humidor rental revenue > 10% --> exempt tobacco bar
Tobacco Sales + humidor rental revenue < 10% --> covered by smoking ban
Establishments that do not have humidor rental revenue will have a harder time getting over the 10% threshold because they have to rely solely on tobacco sales. Ozio, because it does not have humidors, will have a harder time than Shelley's in meeting the 10% test. Also, the mayor has discretion to grant an exemption.
Ah, now I see what you meant by your earlier comment. Well Ozio must do quite well with their sale of cigars then.
#13
Posted 13 March 2007 - 02:06 PM
Either that or they have creative books and records.Ah, now I see what you meant by your earlier comment. Well Ozio must do quite well with their sale of cigars then.
#14
Posted 13 March 2007 - 04:07 PM
Either that or they have creative books and records.
$20 worth of free alcohol with the purchase of a $35 cigar anyone?
#15
Posted 13 March 2007 - 06:53 PM
That would be creative. But if I were in charge of auditing their claim of an exemption, I would call "bullshit" on such a maneuver. Is that reallly what they do?$20 worth of free alcohol with the purchase of a $35 cigar anyone?
#16
Posted 14 March 2007 - 02:17 AM
Dave
manager and aspiring wine guru
market street grill, hotel whitcomb
people's republic of san francisco
#17
Posted 14 March 2007 - 06:15 PM
#18
Posted 14 March 2007 - 06:41 PM
#19
Posted 14 March 2007 - 07:40 PM
Not much of a stretch to buy a cigar plus the right to monopolize the table.That's for "bottle service." You get the booze plus the right to monopolize a table. Awesome. (yes, I'm being sarcastic)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











