Bangkok 54 Thai on Columbia Pike, South Arlington
#1
Posted 06 September 2005 - 11:02 AM
Up entering the restaurant, I noticed two things. First of all, like our beloved DonRocks' experience, there were very few Asians in the restaurant. As one myself, my "authenticity meter" tends to ping a bit when I initially walk into a restaurant serving ethnic food without people of that ethnicity dining there. Secondly, I was taken aback as to how full the restaurant was (over 80%) despite given the late hour and it being a weeknight. Business is still going strong, so they must be doing at least something right!
To the food...For apps, we had the Green Papaya Salad and Larb. The salad was darn good. Crispy papaya, accentuated by the peanuts, combined with the saltiness of the fish sauce and the spiciness of the chillis; a definite winner. The larb was just as good with similar complex flavors and provided the most heat for the evening (and it proved to be quite a delicious snack the next day with toast as well).
We both were far less adventurous with our entrees as we ordered the Simple Beef Fried Rice and their special 54 Fried Rice. Well-flavored ingredients (shrimp, chicken, and beef) mixed with equally well-flavored rice made these dishes particularly satisfying as well. The friend who I was dining with (who happened to be Thai) was impressed with the authenticity of the food and said that it was just like mom used to make (blowing my initial snap judgement out of the water).
Service on our visit was very good. Our waitress was particularly attentive, but certainly not in an overbearing way. I was most impressed with her (and the other servers') enthusiasm in delivering birthday cakes and singing that dreaded song to the three tables that were celebrating that evening!
Definitely looking forward to returning and diving deeper into the menu...perhaps it may even unseat my current Thai favorite, Sawatadee.
#2
Posted 06 September 2005 - 12:06 PM
#3
Posted 06 September 2005 - 12:44 PM
"I had gone to bed Henry Jekyll, I had awakened Edward Hyde.” These words by Robert Louis Stevenson reflect the most recent meals I had at El Pueblo and Straits of Malaya (Straits on a Sunday), two particularly cruel examples of how it’s possible for a restaurant to seemingly fall off a cliff overnight.
Dinner at Bangkok 54 was the most disappointing meal I’ve had in weeks if not months, because given all the recent raves about it by people I have confidence in, it never once occurred to me that it would be anything short of great.
The first thing I noticed about Bangkok 54 was how many non-Asians were dining there. When I got up midway through the meal and took a lap around the dining room, I counted 18 tables with customers, and 15 out of the 18 did not have a single Asian diner. That alone is enough to sound alarm bells clanging, but in this case it could perhaps be fallout from the recent Washington Post review.
Service was haphazard and seemingly random: our server was friendly, but twice during the meal she took so long to respond that I needed to flag her down. At one point I had to ask the woman pouring water to fill a request made ten minutes beforehand because I couldn’t find the server. Out of three entrees ordered, the first two came out together from the kitchen, and the third did not appear for a good five minutes afterward.
The Green Papaya Salad was the highlight of the meal by a good margin, and was the only dish of the evening worth finishing. It had backbone and character, and is worth a repeat visit or a carryout order for this alone.
But contrast that with the Yum Pla Duk Fu salad, which was unsauced shredded lettuce, plain unchopped peanuts, slices of unseasoned raw onion, and something that was supposed to be “fried fish,” but tasted more like fried dryer lint, or perhaps more accurately, fried nothing, as there was seemingly nothing there except the shreds of fried fry. The texture and flavor was slightly mitigated when an accompanying bowl of sauce was spooned atop, but the dish was simply inedible by anyone not engaged in masochism. They apparently don’t offer this dish on their delivery menu because they say it doesn’t transport well, but the fried fish strands arrived very close to room temperature anyway. The Yum Pla Duk Fu was dismissed as an aberration, but as I was soon to discover, the warning had just been sounded.
How can anyone mess up a Green Curry Jae, which is described as “Fried tofu, Thai eggplant, mixed vegetables and sweet basil in a green coconut-curry sauce?” Not only was the sauce sugared down, but the vegetables were bland and lifeless, the wedges of tofu were lukewarm, and the entire dish had a feeling of being “assembled” at the last minute rather than having any depth or persistence.
And yet the Shrimp Potpourri - shrimp, cellophane noodles with special house sauce served in a clay pot – was just as bad, the “special house sauce” tasting like watered-down fish sauce with sugar in it, and the “clay pot” being a cheap service vessel rather than anything adding to the dish. The shrimp themselves tasted like the frozen shrimp you buy at Whole Foods by-the-scoop, overcooked in a water-based medium so they were tough and bland, and added at the last minute - there was no integration with the rest of the dish.
But the worst plate of the evening was the special Five Spices Stewed Duck, which remains the most disastrous duck dish I have had in recent times, the half-duck served at room temperature and chopped up atop yet another sugared-down, watery, thin broth. Literally two bites of this expensive special were eaten, and the rest was left because it was simply not enjoyable, the duck being cold, soggy and uninteresting, and the sauce being westernized to the point of condescension. At the end of the meal, two different servers came up and could not understand why I didn’t want to take the dish home.
I cannot reconcile the glowing reviews of people with my own experience. To put this in perspective, I’ve now had only one meal at Bangkok 54, and perhaps twenty meals (between dine-in and take-out) at Thai Square down the street. Though Thai Square hasn’t had a 100%-success rate, I have never had anything there that was as bad as the four worst things I had at Bangkok 54.
An off night? Perhaps so, but there would have to be some pretty fundamental changes that transpired before this food could even be considered merely good.
I wanted to love it,
Rocks.
---
[Edit: This is one post I wish I never wrote. I've been back and liked it more the second time, especially the fried whole fish special, but I guess I remain in the overwhelming minority in not being able to unequivocally rave (at least for now).
By the way, have I lost my mind, or did I see another Bangkok 54 over near Del Ray?]
This post has been edited by DonRocks: 06 September 2005 - 12:57 PM
#4
Posted 06 September 2005 - 12:44 PM
We followed it with Beef Massamun, Crispy Pork Belly & Chinese Broccoli , and the Pad Thai. The Beef Massamun was tender and with just the right amount of spice. I had to convince my wife that we should get the pork belly, but she was happy I did. The pork was cooked perfectly crispy, and it was a great matched with the brown sauce. The Pad Thai was not my favorite version. But it was servicable, and the noodles were cooked well, I just did not care that much for it.
I will continue to go back when I have the craving for Thai food.
W.C. Fields
#5
Posted 06 September 2005 - 03:16 PM
#6
Posted 06 September 2005 - 03:46 PM
The best part to me is the inclusion of several dishes rarely found elsewhere, or if common, done so much better. I adore the dish with "Smelly Beans" and am always amused at how I am gently encouraged not to order it. I think the pork belley and the Som Tum are both definitely a cut above the typical. Their soft spring roll with avocado is non traditional but quite good. Given that I live in Silver Spring (and outer silver Spring at that) I am quite willing to make the hike to Bangkok54.
Restaurant & Enoteca in Cleveland Park
Website
Sign up for the Dino e-mail list
Dino on Twitter
#7
Posted 07 September 2005 - 03:42 PM
#8
Posted 07 September 2005 - 04:18 PM
deangold, on Sep 6 2005, 04:46 PM, said:
The best part to me is the inclusion of several dishes rarely found elsewhere, or if common, done so much better. I adore the dish with "Smelly Beans" and am always amused at how I am gently encouraged not to order it. I think the pork belley and the Som Tum are both definitely a cut above the typical. Their soft spring roll with avocado is non traditional but quite good. Given that I live in Silver Spring (and outer silver Spring at that) I am quite willing to make the hike to Bangkok54.
Since you're in SS and dine regularly at Hollywood East, have you also tried Ruan Thai, and how do you think it compares to BK54 and others in the Columbia Pike crowd?
And BTW, this is off topic but how's planning going for the Joe's noodle get-together? I'm psyched for that one......
We carry a carefully selected range of professional stainless steel cookware and cutlery that was designed and manufactured for restaurants and other professional venues. It is of excellent quality and priced fairly.
Visit us at www.profpots.com
#9
Posted 07 September 2005 - 05:30 PM
DonRocks, on Sep 6 2005, 01:44 PM, said:
Indeed, what you saw was the second Bangkok 54 grocery store. http://www.bangkok54...ok54grocery.htm
The little I know of the history of the place is that it started as a grocery store serving a little carry out, and when a space in the same building came available, the landlord offered it to the family for a restaurant.
Mr. S and I have been there 3-4 times, and it is our favorite Thai restaurant, although we claim no sophistication in that cuisine. We just like the way their food tastes.
Last time I had the duck rolls from the monthly specials menu. I loved them! My entree was also from the specials menu, and I neglected to write down what it was, but I ate every bite.
Mr. S has loved the Panang Curry andI have enjoyed one of their pork belly entrees in the past.
We usually go for lunch on Sundays, when it is not very crowded. The place is comfy, the service is good, and we do love the food.
I've been to Thai Square once, for lunch on a weekday, but it didn't grab me the way Bangkok 54 has. I've also been to the Thai restaurant across Columbia Pike from B54, which was very nice, but I like B54 best.
ScotteeM
#10
Posted 07 September 2005 - 10:41 PM
johnb, on Sep 7 2005, 04:18 PM, said:
And BTW, this is off topic but how's planning going for the Joe's noodle get-together? I'm psyched for that one......
Just tried Ruan Thai for the first time. Nice homey effort, a curtry thing with auteed greens off the lunch specials. Great to find as Supporn has fallen off a clif as far as I am concerned. The last two times we went to Supporn we walked out after 20 minutes or so and no visable service what so ever. But B54 seems to be in a different category altogether. More sophisticated and daring menu.
Still waiting for Audrey to get us a menu for the Joe's dinner adn then I will pass it to Jenna (HillValley) for posting and details etc.
Restaurant & Enoteca in Cleveland Park
Website
Sign up for the Dino e-mail list
Dino on Twitter
#11
Posted 09 November 2005 - 10:27 AM
We followed that with an order of Panang Chicken, and another dish off of the specials menu called “Herb, Ginger, and Sesame Beef”. The Panang was far more complex than most Thai restaurants. I could actually taste the layers of flavor, without anyone over powering the other. The heat was just right for me, but a little much for my wife. The chicken was quite tender, and actually tasted like chicken. The beef dish was interesting. The menu said that it had been marinated for 24 hours, and it tasted that way. I am not sure what they marinated it in, but it was tasty. The herbs looked like parsley or cilantro, but tasted different, it did add a refreshing foil to the heat from the young ginger that was also in the dish. It like everything else we had last night was very good.
W.C. Fields
#12
Posted 20 November 2005 - 01:10 AM
But I've had one too many unctuous, braised with root vegetables, too rich versions at "hatue" places.
But - Crispy pork belly with chili basil. My go-to dish at any Thai restaurant is chicken or beef kaprow. I love the heat and the garlic and everythng that you can love about Thai flavors. So I gave this a try, but I went so far as to order a second entree of Drunken Noodles just in case the pork belly was the flabby version I've had before.
But the meat proved itself to be the perfect counterpoint to the spice of the sauce. And the sauce iwas the perfect counterpoint to the rich meat. It helps cut the rich texture of the pork fat where most preparations only serve to make the mouth feel more oppressive.
I've been fortunate enough to have eaten at dozens of great restaurants here and around the country over the last eleven months. I've spent a lot of money and had too many expensive ingredients to count.
But this $9.95 dish from a store front restaurant on Columbia Pike turned out a top contender for my "Top dishes of 2005" list.
And it restored my faith in pork belly.
#13
Posted 14 December 2005 - 10:59 AM
A&J Restaurant
#14
Posted 14 December 2005 - 11:14 AM
gnatharobed, on Dec 14 2005, 10:59 AM, said:
NO.
W.C. Fields
#15
Posted 14 December 2005 - 12:08 PM
Sthitch, on Dec 14 2005, 11:14 AM, said:
One of the things I liked about the dish was the variance in the texture of the meat. Some pieces were alomst crisp while some were chewy and meaty and others meltingly tender and fatty.
Sorry you didn't like it, but give it another shot if you get a chance.
#16
Posted 15 December 2005 - 01:58 PM
I work in the district and live in NoVa and by reason of necessity can't leave Georgetown until around 8 pm on Friday evenings. Consequently (thanks to this forum !) I've made it a habit to stop at Bangkok 54 for dinner many Friday nights. So many in fact that I guess I'm considered a reqular by the staff.
Last Friday I stopped and I ordered the crispy pork for the umpteenth time. Well it was QUITE different from what I was used too. Indeed there were many pieces of very overdone pork in the dish. The size of the pieces of pork were very inconsistent - in contrast to what I had enjoyed many times in the past - and the sauce was definitely not up to par.
Chalking it up to a bad night, maybe someone was sick, maybe some kind of last minute problem, who knows? I ate my dish and reflected on my many other positive experiences there to remind myself why I patronize the establishment. As we were putting on our coats a familiar host came up and asked us how we were doing. Small talk ensued and I asked if a new chef was working. Sensing my overtones a discussion of the dish took place and indeed she told me that someone different was cooking. It seems someone else in addition to the regular cook. ( Perhaps this is due to the HUGE influx of business I saw after the Post Fall Dining Guide came out online ) The staff member suggested that when I order next, I ask that the "old" chef prepare my dish. I'm not sure what kind of solution that is to what was an obvious problem, but at the time I thought to myself that I would just order regularly the next time and see where the chips fall. I think rather that avoiding a certain chef that they need to supervise the new person more closely and keep the kitchen on track. We'll see what I happens and I will endeavor to report back.
Thanks for the great forum I've learned alot here.
BD
This post has been edited by Billy DeLion: 15 December 2005 - 02:00 PM
#17
Posted 15 December 2005 - 02:51 PM
A&J Restaurant
#18
Posted 22 December 2005 - 05:26 PM
Quote
Sthitch, on Dec 14 2005, 11:14 AM, said:
Well, that's how it was when I was there last night. Shards of desiccated, overfried pork belly that had seen a hot surface perhaps a few hours ago, reheated in a sauce whose tastiness barely managed to compensate for the tortuous mouthfeel of the main ingredient. We mentioned the problem to our server and received a 20% discount on our next visit--which I am not sure will ever occur.
We also had rolls (house special and crispy). These were excellent. Service was friendly but erratic. Martinis were very old school, as in 2/3 gin, 1/3 vermouth. But I like them a bit wet anyway. Inconsistency seems to be the bugaboo here.
Banco: That's not Jello. It's aspic.
#19
Posted 12 March 2006 - 12:55 PM
The Issan Combo ($10.95) is a duo of the Green Papaya Salad and chicken Satay. The Green Papaya Salad has been consistently wonderful here, but no longer – it was thin, watery, and the heat was all superficial. Two little skewers of chicken Satay were so bland they could have been boiled, and the “chili dipping sauce” didn’t arrive with the dish, so they were dunked in the water from the Green Papaya Salad which at least lent them some flavor. Part of the $5.00 upcharge of the Issan Combo vis-à-vis the individual Green Papaya Salad ($5.95) is a bowl of sticky rice. The rice arrived fresh out of the microwave – they forgot to take the plastic off, and it was still shrink-wrapped – it’s amazing that hermetically-sealed microwaved sticky rice could still manage to be dry, but somehow, after being unraveled from its plastic casing, it was.
This year’s award for chutzpah goes to the person who wrote the menu description for one of the ‘house specialties’ (on a separate menu) – Salmon with Country-Style Panang Curry was described as being a “moderately hot red ‘Panang’ curry” which “is tamed” – tamed! – “with coconut milk and perfumed with kaffir lime leaves and the bright sea flavor of fresh salmon, nestled on a bed of herbed-soy flavor infused green vegetable noodles ($16).” Sounds pretty good, right? The bowl came out, and there was basically a sauceless, green, herbed pasta in the bottom, with a large, dry, lukewarm fillet of salmon sitting on top with no signs of spicing whatsoever. It had the texture of day-old steamed swordfish, and was the single blandest piece of salmon I’ve had in months if not years. Ladled – or squirted – on top was some sort of sweet-ish sauce which tasted Polynesian. That’s it, that’s the dish. This is precisely the level of quality I would expect from a Holiday-Inn catered banquet that had an “Asian Night” theme.
A more pleasant dish was the 54’s Spicy Roasted Duck ($12.95) which was about fifteen bite-sized pieces of meat, seemingly dry rubbed. It arrived warm, not hot, but still retained its crispiness and flavor interest even as it cooled to room temperature. Like the other dishes here, it came with a garnish of chopped iceburg lettuce, cold carrot squiggles, and bad tomatoes. This dish was good, not great, but was the the highlight of the meal by far – it reminds me of a smaller, less-expensive version of Peking Gourmet Inn’s Szechuan Beef Proper.
And speaking of Chinese restaurants, the Pad Phrik Khing Jae ($7.50) is described as wok-fired “string beans, fresh kaffir lime leaves and mixed seasonal vegetables in a spicy chili paste sauce.” Like much of this meal, this dish of uninteresting, sweet-and-vaguely-spicy, stir-fried vegetables (pea pods, chopped broccoli, carrots, baby corn, etc.) could easily be mistaken for something other than Thai, and is emblematic of the confused and pandering nature of the food coming out of this kitchen.
Bangkok 54 isn't "bad" so much as it is ordinary - it's certainly the most overrated Thai restaurant in the Washington, DC area right now. If you want Americanized fare that’s Thai in name only, go to Crystal Thai on Route 50 or Paya Thai in Vienna – both are better and more satisfying than Bangkok 54.
Cheers,
Rocks
#20
Posted 12 March 2006 - 01:23 PM
I love the space, its beautifully done with modernistic simplicity while still retaining an ethnic flavor. I always stop for a few minutes at the open kitcken in the rear.
I love pork belly and after reading Bilrus's all thums up post gave it a shot. The pork was so crisp ( dry?) that I had a tough time chewing and the sauce was nothing to write home about and too little at that. Perhaps it was the chef's night off.
My vote goes to Po-Siam in Alexandria ( they do not have pork belly though).
#21
Posted 12 March 2006 - 06:49 PM
bbhasin, on Mar 12 2006, 01:23 PM, said:
Sorry to have led you astray bbhasin - I still have it in my head that this was a good dish. I remember a balanced dish with a mix of textures. Chewey, crisp, gelatenous. Other reports lead me to believe that consistency is a problem with this dish. I need to try it again soon.
#22
Posted 13 March 2006 - 01:25 PM
bilrus, on Mar 12 2006, 06:49 PM, said:
No you don't. The last couple of times I have had it there it has been the crispy version described above. Not sure why it has changed, but it is not nearly as good as what was once there.
As a side note, I had the same dish at another Thai restaurant (name forgotten, but in Fairfax near the courthouse) and it was cooked in the same crispy manner.
#23
Posted 25 March 2006 - 08:14 AM
Reading the recent comments, I decided to take one for the team and I went for lunch last week. The regular waitress was absent, and I heard another server tell a customer that she is on vacation.
I ordered the pork belly with Chinese broccoli from the lunch combination. The egg roll that accompanied it was fresh tasting and crisp with fresh cabbage. The pork belly was better last week than in February. It was crisp and moist and with a bit of chewiness that I wouldn't call tough--what I expect it to be. The sauce was tasty, and not overbearing, and the broccoli was fresh and crisp.
I was a little amused by a couple sitting nearby, who tried to ask the waitress whether they serve Sesame Chicken, since they didn't see it on the menu. After a brief conversation, they got up and left, apologizing. Either they meant to go into the Chinese restaurant next door, or they didn't realize that this isn't a Chinese restaurant.
I'll go back for lunch at Bangkok 54 again soon. I expect I'll continue to find enjoyment there.
Of course, I don't have any taste in Thai cuisine, and the fact that I like the food here is no guarantee that someone who knows and loves Thai cuisine will love this food. I still like it better than Rincome, Thai Square, TK Thai, and Sakoontra (which was downright bad on my last visit in January--I left most of my food and took nothing home).
Mr. S is heading to Bangkok on a layover as he heads to Bhutan next month (for a much-needed vacation), so perhaps he'll come home with more of a point of reference about Thai food, and then set me straight.
#24
Posted 30 June 2006 - 08:08 AM
"Vegetables are a must on a diet. I suggest carrot cake, zucchini bread, and pumpkin pie. ~Jim Davis, Garfield"
#25
Posted 15 December 2007 - 07:38 AM
#26
Posted 17 April 2008 - 08:50 PM
#27
Posted 18 April 2008 - 11:25 AM
That's what keeps me going back over and over.
I'd love to have this dish somewhere else, just for variety, you know? But I have yet to find it made like this anywhere else.
Has anybody familiar with the dish found it on another menu?
#28
Posted 19 April 2008 - 12:38 AM
#29
Posted 16 May 2009 - 01:16 PM
Ericandblueboy, on May 16 2009, 01:53 PM, said:
Am not a fan of finding out that I started a new topic...
Oh ply me with barley,
Or ply me with rye,
Just don't expect to hear
A coherent goodbye.
The Green Hornet
#30
Posted 03 January 2010 - 09:54 AM
54's Spicy Roasted Duck $15
Crispy Pork Belly with Chili-Basil $13
Great atmosphere, nice decor, I'll def. be coming back!


Sign In
Register
Help
Back to top
MultiQuote










