Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'Academy Award'.
Found 3 results
"Monster's Ball" reminds me a little too much of "Crash," which must surely be one of the very worst films ever to win the Academy Award for Best Picture (over "Brokeback Mountain?" Really?) Like "Crash," the acting is good pretty much across the board, but the film is painfully contrived.
I'm not a big fan of violent gangster films - Bonnie and Clyde started it all in 1967, and it continued to "go downhill" (that's my own personal term) during the next 40-50 years, finally having reached its basal conclusion with as much graphic violence as the CGI staff has time to program. I don't like anything by Quentin Tarantino (not Pulp Fiction, not Reservoir Dogs, not anything), but I do enjoy several works by Martin Scorsese, in a "guilty pleasure" sort of way. In theory non-fiction, as it reflects Lucchese crime family associate Henry Hill - who narrates the film - I suppose it reflects real-world violence, and is, in that sense, "important." Looking back, it's hard to believe that this film was made on a $25 million budget in 1990, and brought in $47 million at the box office as recently as 1990 - a success, sure, but not a blockbuster given how famous the movie is. Roger Ebert named it, "The best mob movie ever," and GoodFellas is #94 on AFI's "100 Years, 100 Movies" list. There's no doubt about it: It's famous.
This is as good a time to ask as any: As long as society is making an attempt to overhaul gender inequality, why do the Academy Awards still have separate awards for Best Actor and Best Actress, and Best Supporting Actor and Best Supporting Actress? Back in my youth, my response to equal pay for female tennis players was, jokingly, "Let's throw everyone in the same tournament, and double the prize money." But why *not* throw everyone into the same acting category? I guess it doesn't really hurt anything to leave it as is, but at this point, it doesn't seem very logical.