Joe Riley Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 This is rather exciting to me, a new 92-proof rye whiskey: From Malt advocate publisher and editor, John Hansell: ..I just had a taste. I like it. It’s crisp and vibrantly spicy, but with a rich, silky, sweetness that marries very well with the rye. It is exactly what I think it was designed to be: a mature enough rye whiskey that can be enjoyed neat or on the rocks, but with plenty of youth and vitality to zing in a cocktail.(Incidentally, in case you are wondering, I tried it next to a couple of the other “entry level” straight rye whiskeys to make sure this isn’t all just fancy packaging, and it is indeed a superior product. No, it’s not one of those ultra-aged rye whiskeys on the market, but it wasn’t meant to be either.) It does have a really cool looking bottle, though: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sthitch Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 Well are you going to carry it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanMike Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 Some of the mixology bloggers have been all about it - and I have to admit that the buzz about it makes me excited to try it out. Besides, I love me some rye. Let us know when you get it! (And when you get those cherry and rhubarb bitters!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be_Better_Guys Posted October 11, 2008 Share Posted October 11, 2008 So what's the difference between this and the Jim Beam Rye whiskey already available, other than proof? jst curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Riley Posted October 11, 2008 Author Share Posted October 11, 2008 So what's the difference between this and the Jim Beam Rye whiskey already available, other than proof? jst curious. Age and barrel selection. It's also from a warehouse which tends to produce suppler whiskey with some extra age. I'm not surprised that there is no age statement on the bottle, because that would back them into a corner, whereas this way they get to blend as they please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now