Jump to content

Top 11 Compounds Found in U.S. Drinking Water


Joe Riley
 Share

Recommended Posts

If this doesn't make you want to run out and get a Brita filter, then nothing will

Top 11 compounds in U.S. drinking water

A comprehensive survey of the drinking water for more than 28 million Americans has detected the widespread but low-level presence of pharmaceuticals and hormonally active chemicals.

Little was known about people's exposure to such compounds from drinking water, so Shane Snyder and colleagues at the Southern Nevada Water Authority in Las Vegas screened tap water from 19 US water utilities for 51 different compounds. The surveys were carried out between 2006 and 2007.

The 11 most frequently detected compounds - all found at extremely low concentrations - were:

• Atenolol, a beta-blocker used to treat cardiovascular disease

• Atrazine, an organic herbicide banned in the European Union, but still used in the US, which has been implicated in the decline of fish stocks and in changes in animal behaviour

• Carbamazepine, a mood-stabilising drug used to treat bipolar disorder, amongst other things

• Estrone, an oestrogen hormone secreted by the ovaries and blamed for causing gender-bending changes in fish

• Gemfibrozil, an anti-cholesterol drug

• Meprobamate, a tranquiliser widely used in psychiatric treatment

• Naproxen, a painkiller and anti-inflammatory linked to increases in asthma incidence

• Phenytoin, an anticonvulsant that has been used to treat epilepsy

• Sulfamethoxazole, an antibiotic used against the Streptococcus bacteria, which is responsible for tonsillitis and other diseases

• TCEP, a reducing agent used in molecular biology

• Trimethoprim, another antibiotic

The concentrations of pharmaceuticals in drinking water were millions of times lower than in a medical dose, and Snyder emphasises that they pose no public health threat. He cautions, though, that "if a person has a unique health condition, or is concerned about particular contaminants in public water systems, I strongly recommend they consult their physician".

Christian Daughton of the EPA's National Exposure Research Laboratory says that neither this nor other recent water assessments give cause for health concern. "But several point to the potential for risk - especially for the fetus and those with severely compromised health."

Daughton says the contamination surveys help people realise how they are intimately and inseparably connected with their environment. "The occurrence of pharmaceuticals in the environment also serves to make us acutely aware of the chemical sea that surrounds us," he says.

Modern life

While the US government regulates the levels of pathogens in US drinking water, there are no rules for pharmaceuticals and other compounds, apart from one: the herbicide atrazine. The atrazine levels measured by Snyder and colleagues were well within federal limits.

Snyder says water utilities could make drinking water purer. But the costs of "extreme purification" - far beyond what is needed for safety alone - are huge in terms of increased energy usage and carbon footprint. Ultra-pure water might not even be safe, adds Snyder.

The widespread occurrence of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors reflects improved detection techniques, rather than greater pollution, says Snyder. Contamination is a fact of modern life, he adds.

"As we continue to populate and aggregate, our wastes will certainly accumulate where we live," he says. "We as a species have decided to live a modern life, with pharmaceuticals, plastics, transportation - therefore we must accept that there will be a certain degree of contamination."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would a Brita, or other home filter be able to remove these things from the water?
Maybe parts of some of those chemical structures, but part of the filter is the charcoal, which is only an absorbant of the impurities, and only if it would bind, if I'm remembering correctly. I think no, but maybe I'm wrong. On the other hand, the bright news is that you now can recycle Brita filters at participating WFs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe parts of some of those chemical structures, but part of the filter is the charcoal, which is only an absorbant of the impurities, and only if it would bind, if I'm remembering correctly. I think no, but maybe I'm wrong. On the other hand, the bright news is that you now can recycle Brita filters at participating WFs.

If I am remembering my chemistry correctly, and it has been a loooooong time, it should absorb the organic compounds (most of the drugs listed) with relative ease. Just remember to change the filters regularly as they become "full" and will not function properly and can even release bound impurities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang... there was a day when the highest level contaminants were, to my understanding, metabolites of recreational drugs & halucinogens and undigested cocaine. More proof that the free love generation is now the depends nation!

LOL, were that still the case (recreational adjuncts), they might consider a surcharge for the l'eau d'amusement on the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...