Chris Cunningham Posted July 31, 2006 Posted July 31, 2006 Appleby's HellWas out in Chantilly yesterday for the gun show, and my buddy and I were really hungry so we decided to go to Appleby's only because we hoped it would work in a pinch. So go in and get sat, then waiter who might be about 20 comes to table to take order. We ordered the boneless chicken wings, then both got burgers, one coke and one diet coke. When I asked that my burger be cooked medium and with the barbeque sauce on the side, he tells me that he thinks they have to cook it medium-well, but he will check with the manager. As for the buffalo tenders he goes into lenghty explanation of mild vs spicy. I opt for spicy. About five minutes later, he brings the sodas to the table, asking who gets diet-regular, we tell him. About ten minutes later the burgers come to the table. I looked at him and inquired as to the whereabouts of the buffalo tenders. DEER IN THE HEADLIGHT LOOK. Oh, do you guys still want those he asked, n ot quite sure himself. Yes, I say as I ask him for soda refills for both of us. Start in on burger and notice that sauce is on the side, yet also on the burger! My buddy ordered the same burger and got no sauce at all. He surived. Walking dead returns with the sodas only to auction them off. The kid only had 2 tables to deal with. The funny thing was this was kind of enjoyable to experience, with his 2.3 minute responses. Buffalo tenders come out near completion of the burgers and we start eating them. No more than 4 minutes had passed when Keeanu comes back and asked if were done. A simple no is my response, but I'm thinking that this guy is Agraria/Extra Virgin waiter material. Check is dropped about 10 minutes after that and the bill is $25.34 and "I'll take that when your ready" is gladly optioned to us. We throw down $40.00-2 twenty's and take a bet as to whether or not he is going to ask us if we want change. Personally I feel a 60% tip was a bit much, but who am I to question. Sure enough, he picks up the check and asks the million dollar question--" do you guys need change", trying not to either laugh/grab him by the neck and shake him, I just said Yes. It's always a roll of the dice in these places, and the meal was what we expected-decent for what we ordered. He was no Justin Guthrie, but hey, who is.
Spiral Stairs Posted July 31, 2006 Posted July 31, 2006 Will Don have the stomach to ... break off that post into a separate Applebee's thread? I will be checking all day.
The Hersch Posted July 31, 2006 Posted July 31, 2006 Start in on burger and notice that sauce is on the side, yet also on the burger! My buddy ordered the same burger and got no sauce at all. Um, the sauce on the side was for the sauceless burger your buddy got, which should have been yours?I ate at an Applebee's once, and that was once too often. God what a hole.
DonRocks Posted July 31, 2006 Posted July 31, 2006 Will Don have the stomach to ... break off that post into a separate Applebee's thread?I will be checking all day.
KOK Posted July 31, 2006 Posted July 31, 2006 No more than 4 minutes had passed when Keeanu comes back and asked if were done. THAT is the smile of the week.Thanks,Kevin
erikv Posted July 31, 2006 Posted July 31, 2006 I once went to the Applebees next to the State Theatre in Falls Church....We hoped to have a couple beers and some appetizers prior to a concert We placed an initial orderfor a round of beers and some wings, then our "waiter" disappeared (along with any other staff). After admiring the stylish decor for over 20minutes we decided to leave. Maybe the curbside pickup is the way to eat good in the neighborhood....
laniloa Posted July 31, 2006 Posted July 31, 2006 Applebee's is one of our regular lunch outings places at work. There are very few non-fast food places around us. It is definitely growing on me. You've got a nice range of items so everyone can find something. They have a few tasty salads (spinach salad with grilled shrimp and a warm bacon vinaigrette) that you can get full or half portions of, burgers, sandwiches, and I've even seen a co-worker order a steak. Which was pushing it for me but she seemed to really like it. The Applebee's near me is used to the lunch rush. You can easily get in and out, even with a crowd, in under an hour. They split the bill into individual tickets without a fuss (even with 10 people). And I have yet to have an on the side or substitution messed up. Yeah, we need to tell them who gets what. But it is Applebee's. And they give me another iced tea in a to go cup. And it is much, much better then Quizno's.
bilrus Posted August 1, 2006 Posted August 1, 2006 They have a few tasty salads (spinach salad with grilled shrimp and a warm bacon vinaigrette) I eat "composed" salads for lunch probably three times a week and I've found that the chains actually do on OK job with them. In fact most independents don't really do these that often.Of course we're not talking about organic microgreens, hierloom tomatoes and 100 year old basamic, but as long as they aren't using old bagged lettuces, for a Cobb or BBQ chicken salad places like Champs, or Applebees or even On the Border are fairly good bets.
Bob Wells Posted August 1, 2006 Posted August 1, 2006 I once went to the Applebees next to the State Theatre in Falls Church....We hoped to have a couple beers and some appetizers prior to a concert We placed an initial orderfor a round of beers and some wings, then our "waiter" disappeared (along with any other staff). After admiring the stylish decor for over 20minutes we decided to leave. Maybe the curbside pickup is the way to eat good in the neighborhood.... That Applebee's sits on the site of a beloved local hangout called Mountain Jack's. Applebee's truly blows. The classic example of "corporate" running the show.
Jlock Posted August 1, 2006 Posted August 1, 2006 I say bring on the Applebee's, the Champ's, the Chili's, and the like! The more folks that dine at these establishments, the shorter my wait is at the places that I want to eat!
shogun Posted August 1, 2006 Posted August 1, 2006 I say bring on the Applebee's, the Champ's, the Chili's, and the like!The more folks that dine at these establishments, the shorter my wait is at the places that I want to eat! Yeah...it's easier to get a seat at Palena Cafe on Thursdays because it's $5 Chicken Fried Steakfish Xtravaganza at Applebees, so the punters are there instead of taking up precious bar stools!
qwertyy Posted August 1, 2006 Posted August 1, 2006 That Applebee's sits on the site of a beloved local hangout called Mountain Jack's. Mountain Jack's, of the steakhouse chain?
jml3 Posted December 15, 2011 Posted December 15, 2011 Just for the heck of it, sometimes I'll go to the oldest extant restaurant in this forum (last night, for example, I went to Chi-Cha Lounge which I'll recap in the short). There is, however, something that I refuse to do. A volunteer is requested to bring the next-oldest thread to the forefront. I recently ate at Apelbee's -- in Rexburg, Idaho. Turns out it is the only place in a Mormon-dominated county which serves beer and wine. The wine list was short.
JBag57 Posted December 15, 2011 Posted December 15, 2011 I recently ate at Apelbee's -- in Rexburg, Idaho. Turns out it is the only place in a Mormon-dominated county which serves beer and wine. The wine list was short. I realize that I learn far more here than I contribute, but was it really a good idea to encourage bumping up threads like this?
Barbara Posted December 15, 2011 Posted December 15, 2011 I realize that I learn far more here than I contribute, but was it really a good idea to encourage bumping up threads like this? Of course. It reminds us all that no matter how "refined" our tastes have become, there is a whole universe out there of places which are considered "fine dining" or "special occasion" for the vast majority of the population. And with which modern chefs have to compete for attention. Not to mention price level. Have I told you about my recent experience with Cracker Barrel? (I had no say in that particular venue.) I say this as someone who, as a child, crossed the USA by car on several occasions and ate in many, many independent establishments. They were relatively inexpensive and much better than any of these chains and reflected the local influences. Of course, the microwave oven hadn't been invented back then, nor the frozen food industry to any extent. Do I think something precious has been lost? You betcha.
jayandstacey Posted December 15, 2011 Posted December 15, 2011 Heads up to anyone considering heading to Applebees: it is a bit misleading as they serve neither apples nor bees. They just aren't on the menu. I bring this up as an older thread for "Black Hog BBQ" in Frederick noted that they didn't serve meat from endangered Black Hogs and thus the place should be avoided. And so, since there are some that have such rules, it should be known to those that Applebee's is similarly confusing. (as if mocking us, Panda Express even shows us pictures of Pandas - but not a single shred of Panda loin, Panda burger or even Panda soup.)
JuneBacon Posted December 15, 2011 Posted December 15, 2011 Heads up to anyone considering heading to Applebees: it is a bit misleading as they serve neither apples nor bees. They just aren't on the menu. I bring this up as an older thread for "Black Hog BBQ" in Frederick noted that they didn't serve meat from endangered Black Hogs and thus the place should be avoided. And so, since there are some that have such rules, it should be known to those that Applebee's is similarly confusing. (as if mocking us, Panda Express even shows us pictures of Pandas - but not a single shred of Panda loin, Panda burger or even Panda soup.) Its kinda like Good Stuff Eatery .....
JimRice Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 Heads up to anyone considering heading to Applebees: it is a bit misleading as they serve neither apples nor bees. They just aren't on the menu. ... (as if mocking us, Panda Express even shows us pictures of Pandas - but not a single shred of Panda loin, Panda burger or even Panda soup.) Its kinda like Good Stuff Eatery ..... Dear god, I don't know if I'll be able to stop laughing before I go to bed.
DonRocks Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 Dear god, I don't know if I'll be able to stop laughing before I go to bed. The sole criterion here for one-liner posts (dealing with whether they survive the night, or are deleted) is quite simple: they have to make the Laugh Committee laugh. The laugh committee is a committee of one, and by golly if I, erm, the Committee didn't have one good hell of a chuckle over this one. Well done, old chap Parkwster, well done.
lizzie Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 Its kinda like Good Stuff Eatery ..... This is funnier every time I read it. But to bring thread back on topic, sometimes Applebee's might be your only option so you do your best to pick carefully. I travel frequently to rural areas for my work, and say one arrives in Galax, VA after the only local restaurants have already closed for the evening, your choices are Applebee's or buying groceries at Walmart, Applebee's wins. Start with a cold beer, since they actually usually get that right and sometimes have decent beer available, and get a burger or fish and chips or something equally simple. Not your best meal ever, but passable. And then toast with your colleagues that we live where we have many more and better options available on a daily basis, and that our towns and industries have not been so battered by imports that many of the restaurants and other small businesses have closed. So, where is the Chili's thread...
Escoffier Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 So, where is the Chili's thread... I think you just started it (and because it happens to be day specific to today...). Where's the TGIF thread? After all, It's (almost) always Friday's in here.
Heather Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 Of course. It reminds us all that no matter how "refined" our tastes have become, there is a whole universe out there of places which are considered "fine dining" or "special occasion" for the vast majority of the population. And with which modern chefs have to compete for attention. Not to mention price level. Have I told you about my recent experience with Cracker Barrel? (I had no say in that particular venue.) I disagree that modern chefs have to compete with Applebee's (or Cracker Barrel, or Chili's, or or or). They are marketing to the people that are interested in dining as entertainment, have the disposable income & time, and the "refined" taste to eat there. It's a two-way street - they get to take our cash, and we get to congratulate ourselves on how much better we are than the uneducated masses.There is an entire continent out there that probably doesn't give a rat's ass about "fine dining," and even if it did, doesn't have the coin to spend triple digits on a meal. As for corporate food establishments...I've driven though many communities where the opportunity to sit down at Denny's instead of shouting my order into a microphone from the front seat of the car is a welcome change. Most of the quirky local places with homemade food are long gone - and I would argue that most probably weren't that great to begin with.
thetrain Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 Last time I was at Applebees, about 5 years ago, I ordered the Quesadilla Burger. I figured "when in Rome." It wasn't bad; I've had worse meals at a food truck. And I got to dine surrounded by teenage couples dressed to the nines having the requisite awkward pre-prom dinner date.
Barbara Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 I disagree that modern chefs have to compete with Applebee's (or Cracker Barrel, or Chili's, or or or). They are marketing to the people that are interested in dining as entertainment, have the disposable income & time, and the "refined" taste to eat there. It's a two-way street - they get to take our cash, and we get to congratulate ourselves on how much better we are than the uneducated masses. There is an entire continent out there that probably doesn't give a rat's ass about "fine dining," and even if it did, doesn't have the coin to spend triple digits on a meal. As for corporate food establishments...I've driven though many communities where the opportunity to sit down at Denny's instead of shouting my order into a microphone from the front seat of the car is a welcome change. Most of the quirky local places with homemade food are long gone - and I would argue that most probably weren't that great to begin with. Your first point is fair, of course. Except that our beloved city gets tourists who suffer from sticker-shock at anything other than the chains. As for your second point, I recall many local, quirky places had some really delightful food. Until the corporate takeover of everything, those were the only kinds of places to eat at in El Paso and in small towns all across the country. There were some really excellent (and not that expensive) restaraunts in Juarez, but not any more, alas. These days the local, quirky, homemade food emporia are usually ethnic places. I'll take the lowliest noodle parlor over Applebee's and its kin any day. ETA: This has made me wonder about the affect of the chains on local restaurants vis-a-vis expectations. I'm not sure if it's easy to be an independent place in Podunk surrounded by chains. Has there been a dumbing down?
Heather Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 These days the local, quirky, homemade food emporia are usually ethnic places. I'll take the lowliest noodle parlor over Applebee's and its kin any day. I definitely agree. Unfortunately many of the ethnic places seem to be succumbing to the Sysco-fication of the world. As for your ETA...I don't know if it's a dumbing down so much as diminishing returns. I can imagine it's much, much easier to operate with a corporate structure propping you up, especially in smaller towns.
B.A.R. Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 The top search on Google, out of 590,000+ pages! Bravo!
durwoodx Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 I recall many local, quirky places had some really delightful food. Until the corporate takeover of everything, those were the only kinds of places to eat at in El Paso and in small towns all across the country. There were some really excellent (and not that expensive) restaraunts in Juarez, but not any more, alas. These days the local, quirky, homemade food emporia are usually ethnic places. I'll take the lowliest noodle parlor over Applebee's and its kin any day. You ought to make your way down the road 40 miles to Las Cruces and environs. Plenty of great local, quirky places there!
jayandstacey Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 I disagree that modern chefs have to compete with Applebee's (or Cracker Barrel, or Chili's, or or or). They are marketing to the people that are interested in dining as entertainment, have the disposable income & time, and the "refined" taste to eat there. It's a two-way street - they get to take our cash, and we get to congratulate ourselves on how much better we are than the uneducated masses. There is an entire continent out there that probably doesn't give a rat's ass about "fine dining," and even if it did, doesn't have the coin to spend triple digits on a meal. Agreed. Most people (literally - the majority of humans) are not interested in "fine" dining, regardless of price point. The reason is simple: they prefer consistency. Applebees is consistent in three ways: 1. it serves the same stuff they grew up on 2. it serves the same kinds of things that other chains serve 3. it serves the same dishes day after day, year after year. 4. it serves them the same way every time, in every location. It is about safety, and when it comes to food, most people will take safety over any other factor. And I believe this is true at most any income level except maybe the highest brackets that can make expensive places their "old standbys". I believe a middle class person is most likely to want to say "it is Friday night, I'm going to treat myself and I know exactly what I want - I don't want to risk botching it and I don't want to try something new." So, off to Applebees. Again.
Barbara Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 Agreed. Most people (literally - the majority of humans) are not interested in "fine" dining, regardless of price point. The reason is simple: they prefer consistency. Applebees is consistent in three ways: 1. it serves the same stuff they grew up on 2. it serves the same kinds of things that other chains serve 3. it serves the same dishes day after day, year after year. 4. it serves them the same way every time, in every location. It is about safety, and when it comes to food, most people will take safety over any other factor. And I believe this is true at most any income level except maybe the highest brackets that can make expensive places their "old standbys". I believe a middle class person is most likely to want to say "it is Friday night, I'm going to treat myself and I know exactly what I want - I don't want to risk botching it and I don't want to try something new." So, off to Applebees. Again. This is all truly correct, I'm sure. What I'm wondering, and didn't exactly put this well in my "dumbing down" remark, is how much local cuisine is being lost to the corporate mentality? Every region, and sub-region, has always had its own specialties and tastes, which is why there were (are?) so many interesting Mom-and-Pop places to eat. It is those places, and the loss there of, which concern me most. The chains have taught the vast majority out there to prize food that is not prepared well, and is often not very nutritious too boot.
jayandstacey Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 This is all truly correct, I'm sure. What I'm wondering, and didn't exactly put this well in my "dumbing down" remark, is how much local cuisine is being lost to the corporate mentality? Every region, and sub-region, has always had its own specialties and tastes, which is why there were (are?) so many interesting Mom-and-Pop places to eat. It is those places, and the loss there of, which concern me most. The chains have taught the vast majority out there to prize food that is not prepared well, and is often not very nutritious too boot. Well, my belief is there's good news there - that we've reached and passed the nadir of whatever that impact is to independantly owned offerings. There will always be a place for applebee's, TGI's, etc - but at the risk of sounding like an armchair undergraduate, I believe the shift in land use planning direction to more urban designs and less suburban sprawl actually can help the locally-owned operation. I think that eventually convenience will trump consistency ("hey, let's try the noodle place at the end of the street vs. getting in the car to go to Applebee's") and eventually those people will find that the local mom-and-pop can be consistent too. Essentially...there's good reason why Applebee's isn't in downtowns...and as more people are in downtowns, there's less Applebee's impact. My four cents (which is twice what people will tolerate)
SeanMike Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 Your first point is fair, of course. Except that our beloved city gets tourists who suffer from sticker-shock at anything other than the chains. As for your A few years ago I ran a get-together for our MMORPG guild (because I - and they - are huge nerds). For the first night we were going to go out and have a dinner somewhere. Now folks were from all over the country, all different types of areas from rural to urban, different expectations and the such. So of course the first thing that came up was "let's do dinner somewhere safe like Chili's or Applebee's". That boggled me! Why would you want to come to DC - for some folks, for the very first time - and just eat at the same place you do at home?! But they knew what they would get, and it felt safe. Also, they were worried about sticker shock. Instead, I showed them a number of local places that had similar prices on similar foods. We ended up doing Old Ebbitt Grill. Which, while often derided as a tourist trap, ended up being perfect for our large group. They got to experience a Washington institution (such as it is) and at the same time have familiar choices that didn't break their budget if they chose to get them. And the service was fantastic. (Over the course of the weekend we also did a reception with Julia's Empanadas and a big cook-out - I can't remember where else, if anywhere, we went that wasn't local to Falls Church at the time but that was before I started reading donrockwell.com. )
DonRocks Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 ETA: This has made me wonder about the affect of the chains on local restaurants vis-a-vis expectations. I'm not sure if it's easy to be an independent place in Podunk surrounded by chains. Has there been a dumbing down? There is a direct parallel between this, and Starbucks out-marketing independent coffee houses, also Wal-Mart undercutting small shops into oblivion. I made it a point today to go to Umami Tea and Coffee and give them my business, instead of going to Starbucks. Am I in a minority? All you need to do is count the number of cookie-cutter chains in this world, and the mindless golems that flock to them. Suggested reading (*) for anyone remotely interested in the topic. (I shop Amazon, but it seemed inappropriate to link to it here.) (*) And yes, you may notice "an influence" in writing style.
jayandstacey Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 Now folks were from all over the country, all different types of areas from rural to urban, different expectations and the such. So of course the first thing that came up was "let's do dinner somewhere safe like Chili's or Applebee's".That boggled me! Why would you want to come to DC - for some folks, for the very first time - and just eat at the same place you do at home?! But they knew what they would get, and it felt safe. Also, they were worried about sticker shock. Safe- exactly. Predictable. They had a group and didn't want to risk disappointing anyone, so go right to the least common demoninator. I wrote above why the consistancy of a place like Applebee's is so important to so many. Here's the perceived risks to 'go local':1. Prices might be much higher although the better food/service just isn't desired by everyone.2. Dishes might be different than expected in some way. A "riff" on mac and cheese, or heavy spices everywhere, or other such unpleasant surprises.3. The service might be bad, or worse, not what's expected. People REALLY don't like feeling confused and in need of help.4. If no one has been there, they might make the assumption that "if it was any good, it would have become more popular and would be a chain by now. I don't want to go to a failing place, or be the guinea pig. Especially not with a group."These are all the opposite of what the average citizen seeks when comforted by consistency.Sometimes I'm amazed new restaurants are able to survive at all if they don't have franchising opportunities built into the business plan from day 1.
porcupine Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 Do you ever feel like you're in a parallel universe? Have friends who Just Don't Get this food thing? I was emailing back and forth with an acquaintance (from the other hobby) about a lunch date. I asked where she'd like to go. Her reply (I swear I am not making this up): "Well... One of my favs is Red Lobster but I can't often get anyone to go with me. We also have a Bugaboo Creek that I like. And down near you I like PF Changs. Any of the classic chains, Chilis, Ruby Tuesdays, etc. are good for me. Also up in Germantown, even further for you, is a Carraba's Italian Grill that is pretty neat. Another place near here I can't get anyone to go to is Chevy's Mexican. I'm pretty open, myself. Thoughts?" Thoughts? I had some thoughts, alright.... I think we ended up at Red Lobster.
jayandstacey Posted December 17, 2011 Posted December 17, 2011 PF Changs and Red Lobster is 'pretty open' compared to others I've encountered. The asian/sea food thing is a bit off-center for them. In fairness - I don't know what the other hobby is. But let's say we (those of us on this board) encountered a group of computer enthusiasts. I work in the IT industry but couldn't give a s**t about what PC I use - I only care that it gives me interwebs, some of my emails and the Excel/Word/etc suite. I'm pretty much like the masses in that respect. The enthusiats would be aghast at my next PC purchase... "you spent $1000 and insisted on a Dell (Lenovo/HP/Acer/etc)???!!!??? For that $1000, you could have had a custom built whiz-banger doo-hickey like mine!!! And I STILL wouldn't be swayed, in fact I might be more adamant about my choice. "I don't care, I don't want to think about it, I'm not looking for an 'experience', just to get through to the next task I have to do. And all else being equal, I'll choose one from a company big enough to maybe provide warranty service if I need it." I think that's how many people see meals. It's just nourishment until the next meal. They don't want to think about it - it is a means to some other end. I get it and don't try to fight it - you really can't. And shouldn't.
porcupine Posted December 18, 2011 Posted December 18, 2011 In fairness - I don't know what the other hobby is. <snip>I think that's how many people see meals. It's just nourishment until the next meal. They don't want to think about it - it is a means to some other end. I get it and don't try to fight it - you really can't. And shouldn't. The one referenced in my signature line, but it doesn't matter. Same as your example. And I agree. And IIRC she was delighted to have someone agree to go to Red Lobster with her...
SeanMike Posted December 18, 2011 Posted December 18, 2011 I think that's how many people see meals. It's just nourishment until the next meal. They don't want to think about it - it is a means to some other end. I get it and don't try to fight it - you really can't. And shouldn't. That's how I am some days. I don't want to think, or explore, or whatever - I just want to grab a bite to eat so I can go back to whatever it is that I was doing. (Speaking of which, it's 12:45 and I haven't eaten yet today...but I do feel like exploring. Where shall I eat in my neighborhood today?)
darkstar965 Posted December 18, 2011 Posted December 18, 2011 ...That boggled me! Why would you want to come to DC - for some folks, for the very first time - and just eat at the same place you do at home?! But they knew what they would get, and it felt safe. Also, they were worried about sticker shock. I think that's how many people see meals. It's just nourishment until the next meal. They don't want to think about it - it is a means to some other end. I get it and don't try to fight it - you really can't. And shouldn't. FWIW, I think the above two snippets near fully explain the phenomenon. To me, no different really than any other hobby or area of interest. Of course, we all have to eat versus collect stamps, watch Fellini or even drive. But that doesn't mean anyone has to particularly care about it: jayandstacey's point. And, no right or wrong in that. But, as with anything, there's always opportunity to persuade, discover and explore. As one who's "into" whatever, can be a great ambassador, role model or friend to others who aren't...yet. Like what SeanMike ended up doing. Huge part of great relationships and a full life. There is a direct parallel between this, and Starbucks out-marketing independent coffee houses, also Wal-Mart undercutting small shops into oblivion. I made it a point today to go to Umami Tea and Coffee and give them my business, instead of going to Starbucks. <snip> Suggested reading (*) for anyone remotely interested in the topic. (I shop Amazon, but it seemed inappropriate to link to it here.) ... With you on the coffee point but, crap, here on the board, we've written volumes about Sidamo, Chinatown, Dolcezza, Caffe Amouri, Qualia, Pound, Quartermaine, Peregrine, Teaism, etc, etc. Lots and lots of super independent, locally-owned options covering most neighborhoods. Last time I checked, their numbers were growing while SBUX has been closing stores. All is not lost in coffee. Books are a different deal though. Don, given your leanings like most here on the board, I'll respectfully submit that you really should be shopping at Politics & Prose instead of the online Starbucks of literature. P&P is the last great hope for independent bookstores in DC and maybe the country. And, they sell online too by partnering with google and from which they can profit. And, they also serve some damn fine joe downstairs. I will link to them here. Coincidentally, the feature story on the P&P homepage right now: Authors attack Amazon's "scorched-earth capitalism" So, go to P&P, buy books, have coffee and then check online with them for whatever may not be in stock. C'mon man! (Speaking of which, it's 12:45 and I haven't eaten yet today...but I do feel like exploring. Where shall I eat in my neighborhood today?) Not sure where you live but there's this fairly new rockin' place, locally-owned, in Logan Circle called Pearl Dive
jayandstacey Posted December 18, 2011 Posted December 18, 2011 But, as with anything, there's always opportunity to persuade, discover and explore. As one who's "into" whatever, can be a great ambassador, role model or friend to others who aren't...yet. Like what SeanMike ended up doing. Huge part of great relationships and a full life. Indeed. In fact, as I enjoyed bruch at Tower Oaks Lodge today, it dawned on me that it would be the perfect kind of "bridge" place between a Red Lobster type and....us. If they still have no desire to explore, so be it - at least the food and service were above the Darden fare. But we also have to keep in mind that they may not wish to move away from Red Lobster, any more than I want to buy special stamps or hang on to them (despite my stamp collecting friends).My family has a Japanese Steak House chain we often visit for extended family gatherings. The little kids love the fire and the onion choo-choo train. That evening, I become sick, every time. Oh well, I try meekly to change it but...there are more important things. And no matter what I'll be hungry again in 12 hours.
thetrain Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 An interesting article from WSJ about chain restaurants and how they are changing and broadening their menus. "Over the past two years, Applebee's has changed about 80% of its menu. It revamped everything from its rice (instant is now long-grain) to the addition of more New Orleans-inspired dishes." Maybe its less bad now? Although its disconcerting they were serving instant rice in the first place...
Pizzaandbrew Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 I think you should appreciate any group is trying to get better at what they do regardless of what that is. I know what you're saying but I think as we raise the bar collectively we challenge everyone to raise their game. Don't look down on Applebee's for trying to get better. Understand they are paying attention.
jayandstacey Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 I think you should appreciate any group is trying to get better at what they do regardless of what that is. I know what you're saying but I think as we raise the bar collectively we challenge everyone to raise their game. Don't look down on Applebee's for trying to get better. Understand they are paying attention. Better? Or more profitable? The article seemed to indicate that menu changes and other culinary effort results are announced to financial analysts, not others. To me, the difference starts with distributed ownership, especially when the chain is publicly held. The result is that profit is the end and all efforts focus toward it. Of course, a single-owner restaurant must also be profitable to survive, but it can also ride out more than one quarter to get to profitable, it can take the stance that "make quality and profit will come" and other such differences. A place like Applebee's, on the other hand, will focus on pasta as it provides greater profit margins over protein...and they seek quality by setting an 'acceptable' bar, then hammering away at consistency to ensure people occasionally return. The article pointed to a few reasons behind this - like the woman who goes to Olive Garden because it is the exact same every time (and she meant that in a good way) and how recipes in chains often end in cheese sauce to help boost popularity (or something to that effect.) I believe most single-owner restaurants would rather lose the business than become known for those traits. My point is that Applebees isn't really getting "better". It is simply chaging to please the masses and to squeeze as hard as possible on that magic economics 101 intersection of maximum guests, maximum revenue and minimal cost. I don't own a restaurant or work in one. Am I wrong here? Maybe I am.
jayandstacey Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 And to be clear, I'm not anti-Applebees, and I understand it is easy to take pop-shots at them. They are masters at their craft - it just seems a slightly different craft than non-chains are practicing.
The Hersch Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 And to be clear, I'm not anti-Applebees, and I understand it is easy to take pop-shots at them. They are masters at their craft - it just seems a slightly different craft than non-chains are practicing. I ate at an Applebee's once, and what I was served didn't even seem like food. Did I miss something?
kirite Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Having been coerced a few times into eating at chains like Cheesecake Factory, I soon realized that these places serve lots of sodium bombs and cholesterol boosters.
sphere777 Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 I dunno. A few jobs ago, I was hired by a Very Big Corporation who had just acquired a Spunky Young Start-Up. Two years later they suddenly shuttered my office, ordered the developers to move north or else, and laid off the rest of the staff (including me). As a futile gesture of sympathy, the VBC manager (who knew all along) took everybody out to Applebee's. To punish him, I ordered the steak since it was the most expensive item on the menu. Instead, I was the one who was punished by the thinnest, toughest, grisliest piece of tasteless meat that I have ever eaten. Given the circumstances, the meal made a bad situation worse. So in the end, bad food does nobody good. And who deserves quality food, the diner who can send his filet back because it is medium instead of medium well, or the family who goes out to Applebee's because at least they can get out of the house for once? Perhaps we all deserve good meals.
porcupine Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Better? Or more profitable? The article seemed to indicate that menu changes and other culinary effort results are announced to financial analysts, not others. To me, the difference starts with distributed ownership, especially when the chain is publicly held. The result is that profit is the end and all efforts focus toward it. Well of course! That's the American way. You aren't one of those anti-American independent thinkers now, are you?
darkstar965 Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Safe- exactly. Predictable. They had a group and didn't want to risk disappointing anyone, so go right to the least common demoninator. I wrote above why the consistancy of a place like Applebee's is so important to so many. <snip> These are all the opposite of what the average citizen seeks when comforted by consistency. Sometimes I'm amazed new restaurants are able to survive at all if they don't have franchising opportunities built into the business plan from day 1. Consistency is subordinate to cash flow/profit/stock valuation when considering chains versus independents and the like. In other words, certain businesses (McDonalds being the ultimate example) are very profitable due to their ability to profit from providing a consistent, desired and cost-effective offering. It's too narrow to see consistency (or franchising) as the key to their success because it understates the case. Many franchised businesses fail (remember the recent "Cereal Bowl" experiment in Cleveland Park?). And many independent businesses (e.g., Palena, Full Kee, Inn at Little Washington) thrive. The formula for a business to succeed is, of course, multivariate with product, management, financing, marketing, sourcing, etc, all playing large roles. For the chains that have succeeded, there are many factors involved beyond "consistency:" - financing. most are large public companies with the huge resource advantages that structure conveys. As just one example, they can procure basic inputs at much lower prices than smaller, "better" restaurants. They can issue new stock to fund expansion with 200 new restaurants ("units") in a single year. Etc. - value and affordability. they provide a high-value offering as most consumers perceive it (not some/most on this thread obviously). this is a huge deal. it's simply not affordable for millions of people to seek out great independent restaurants or even to buy fresh vegetables at the market. Lots of movies and books on this. It's not a problem with a clear solution now (subsidies, economy, etc.) but large chains fill some of the gap between what is good and what is affordable. This is a giant societal problem. - professional management. because the chains are big companies with great resources, they tend to have professional managers who excel at managing costs, marketing and selling, hiring and retaining and managing the supply chain. These are areas critical for any business, however big or small, and can be very challenging for small independent restaurants, who may offer great food...for awhile before they have to close up. From the comments there: "Are all foodies this hateful?" I'm starting to wonder. :-/ Maybe not hateful, I worry about crossing the line from "enlightened consumer" to "elitist douchebag." I've written on dr.com before about labels. As in, I think they are often unhelpful, especially for ones that are either charged or a rorschach test. "Foodies" is a wonderful example of the latter. All kinds of attributes are attached to that label; seemingly more negative than positive. Certain people are hateful while others aren't. Blindingly obvious point. Writing a negative article about "foodies" is a great way to attract readers. But I'm not sure it does anything to simplify, unify, educate or solve problems. People have always been and always will be interested in food as with anything else. Some of them will be jerks and many of them will not be. One can be very knowledgeable and passionate about restaurants and food and not be "elitist." Similarly, one can be a real jerk without knowing much about the thing that ostensibly drives the arrogance. One thing has nothing to do with the other.
jayandstacey Posted December 24, 2011 Posted December 24, 2011 Consistency is subordinate to cash flow/profit/stock valuation when considering chains versus independents and the like. Agree 100% - I was speaking more of what is presented to the customer. Profit is the destination and consistency is the train that takes them there. Any new dish/paint color/5' square menu redesign must prove profitable and be delivered with robotic consistency. ... I was the one who was punished by the thinnest, toughest, grisliest piece of tasteless meat that I have ever eaten. Given the circumstances, the meal made a bad situation worse. So in the end, bad food does nobody good. And who deserves quality food, the diner who can send his filet back because it is medium instead of medium well, or the family who goes out to Applebee's because at least they can get out of the house for once? Agreed here as well - but know that it is very possible that the average Applebees diner actually prefers the kind of meat you had. And not simply that they haven't had any better, they literally prefer the 'bad' stuff. An an example, I much preferred canned veggies over fresh for a loooong time...just because that's what I was used to. Learned behaviors introduce a strong inertia. Loving this multi-quote thing...just discovered it. Is it not possible to 'preview' a post first though? Couldn't we before? (edit - nevermind - found it) Don - are you still happy with the idea of digging up the Applebees thread? new vistors might come thinking "hey, let's find some serious food discussion" then see Applebees near the top of the topics list. Can you undo what's already been done? Do you want to?
DonRocks Posted December 24, 2011 Posted December 24, 2011 Don - are you still happy with the idea of digging up the Applebees thread? [No, especially not in context of what's coming down the pike.]
Heather Posted December 24, 2011 Posted December 24, 2011 [No, especially not in context of what's coming down the pike.] Yeah, I would much rather talk about Camelot.
Steve R. Posted December 24, 2011 Posted December 24, 2011 I ate at an Applebee's once, and what I was served didn't even seem like food. Did I miss something? Nope... not that I know of. My wife and I used to take my mother (now gone for 4 years) out to local Brooklyn eyetalian places for lasagna and ziti and all things tomato-y. But she, in her 80s, wanted to branch out and expand her horizons. So, although we made many recommendations, she insisted that Applebee's was the place to go. She cut out the ad with the address of the nearest one and off we went. Ginny and I downed several frozen (poorly made) drinks to get thru the dinner, but my mother happily finished her honey sweetened chicken and exclaimed "they have a really good chef here". Not much for us to say to that other than "waiter, we'll have another round of drinks please". Thankfully, she didnt ask for a kitchen tour. Just sayin'.
Pat Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 Relevant to this discussion: Chains keeping zombie restaurants alive.
Escoffier Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 Relevant to this discussion: Chains keeping zombie restaurants alive. "we're under-demolished"
Sundae in the Park Posted March 13, 2012 Posted March 13, 2012 Charles Murray's book Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010 has been out for a little while, and I thought this related bubble quiz question (#9) was interesting to us. We knew it already, but apparently eating at an Applebees, TGIF, or Outback really is a deterministic metric for the "unprecedented, class-based cultural gap in America."
FunnyJohn Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 Charles Murray's book Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010 has been out for a little while, and I thought this related bubble quiz question (#9) was interesting to us. We knew it already, but apparently eating at an Applebees, TGIF, or Outback really is a deterministic metric for the "unprecedented, class-based cultural gap in America." Great Catch!
RWBooneJr Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 On a scale from 0 to 20 points, where 20 signifies full engagement with mainstream American culture and 0 signifies deep cultural isolation within the new upper class bubble,you scored between 0 and 4. In other words, your bubble is so thick you may not even know you're in one. I'm still not going to eat at Applebees.
DonRocks Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 I'm still not going to eat at Applebees. Yeah, I got that one, too. Wasn't going to say anything.
bookluvingbabe Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 I scored 5-8. I can see through my bubble but I need to get out more. Or not! I think the fact that I bought Busch beer when the Cards were in the World Series tipped me over the edge. Still not eating at Applebees either.
DanielK Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 Before you read too much into this, the quiz and book were created by a scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, so there's a particular political bias that goes along with it.
weezy Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 I scored between a 9 and 12. I'm in the bubble but I can pass for bubble-less if I have to.
thetrain Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 I scored 13 to 16. I am bubbleless. I don't mind eating at Outback and have worked on a factory floor, but I haven't a clue who that Nascar guy was.
DonRocks Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 I actually worked on a factory floor too, but it was only a couple of days (summer job at Manpower in college), so I couldn't rightfully say yes.
SeanMike Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 Working on a factory floor was one of the best jobs of my high school career. I learned a lot from it, and I don't think I could have made it as far in my field as I have without having done that job.
Ferhat Yalcin Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 LOVE Outback`s `thunder from down under brownie`
FunnyJohn Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 I forget my score, but I can attest that my bubble is in my head. [and, on the topic, if I ever eat at Applebees again, will have my head examined]
RWBooneJr Posted March 14, 2012 Posted March 14, 2012 I've worked on a factory floor, recently purchased cheap American beer, and know the driver of the No. 48 Lowe's Chevy when I see him. I've also eaten at an Applebees, but it was a while ago. That last thing is why I refuse to eat at Applebees.
porcupine Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 Ain't nothin' wrong with owning a pickup truck. ...what is this "NASCAR" thing?
Escoffier Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 Ain't nothin' wrong with owning a pickup truck. ...what is this "NASCAR" thing? Start your engine, turn left.
goodeats Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 Danica Patrick plus having this thread show up of you google any one of those terms. Kinda fun.
Michael Landrum Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 Working on a factory floor was one of the best jobs of my high school career. I learned a lot from it, and I don't think I could have made it as far in my field as I have without having done that job. Forget working on a factory floor. After sexing chicks using the Japanese Anal Method*, there's nothing in the world that even comes close. *Cuttlefish and asparagus, anyone? Hold on Kyle, I believe in youuuuuuuuuuu!
JPW Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 As a marketing tool for Murray's book it's great. As anything else, it's utter crap.
JPW Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 Start your engine, turn left. Except for Watkins Glen and Infineon.
DanielK Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 After sexing chicks using the Japanese Anal Method*, there's nothing in the world that even comes close. *Cuttlefish and asparagus, anyone? Hold on Kyle, I believe in youuuuuuuuuuu! Nice. That's actually kind of relevant given Apple's recent announcement.
SeanMike Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 *Cuttlefish and asparagus, anyone? Hold on Kyle, I believe in youuuuuuuuuuu! (Great episode) (and it makes me glad I didn't order the asparagus salad last night)
Michael Landrum Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 (Great episode) (and it makes me glad I didn't order the asparagus salad last night) Sean Mike, I believe in youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!
Escoffier Posted March 15, 2012 Posted March 15, 2012 Except for Watkins Glen and Infineon. Okay, how about: start engine, turn left most of the time with a couple of exceptions where good ole boys try to remember that stock car racing started as an exercise in running moonshine in the backwoods of Virginia and Tennessee?
jml3 Posted March 16, 2012 Posted March 16, 2012 If you happen to be in Rexburg, Idaho anytime soon (I was there in December), Applebee's is the only place within a 30-mile radius to get a glass of (mediocre) wine. A point in its favor, I guess.
Escoffier Posted March 16, 2012 Posted March 16, 2012 If you happen to be in Rexburg, Idaho anytime soon (I was there in December), Applebee's is the only place within a 30-mile radius to get a glass of (mediocre) wine. A point in its favor, I guess. This immediately raises two questions. Why would anyone go to Idaho, much less Rexburg, Idaho for anything? (To answer my own question, family or Yellowstone National Park.) and the second, in Rexburg, Idaho, I'm sure a thirty mile drive to anyplace is nothing (after all, Pocatello is right down the road) and would consume no more than about 30 minutes of your time. You couldn't wait thirty minutes? (Of course, you'd then have to drive back, reeking of a fine Oregon Pinot and truffled McDonald's fries). In Texas, thirty miles is right next door.
thistle Posted June 3, 2013 Posted June 3, 2013 My daughter had a game Sunday at EC Laurence park- first off, the phone directions sent us to the nature center, so we were a bit late (& she has a first time coach, so she was a bit anxious)-her team won, coming from behind, 13-10, Ft. Hunt Flaming Fireflies (don't even ask) against the Manassas Brigade- after the game, we were ready for lunch, I was up early & threw ribs on the smoker for T's end of season party (& was tired & grumpy), we drove about a mile north, & while the kids argued the virtues of Chipotle vs. Moe's, I weighed in on a chain restaurant (I wanted a sandwich) that was fine, everyone was VERY friendly, we all had a good lunch...(OK, it was Applebee's, probably my first time here in about 16 years, but it was a good sandwich-turkey/bacon/ avocado-I am NOT ashamed).
Toogs Posted June 5, 2013 Posted June 5, 2013 My daughter had a game Sunday at EC Laurence park- first off, the phone directions sent us to the nature center, so we were a bit late (& she has a first time coach, so she was a bit anxious)-her team won, coming from behind, 13-10, Ft. Hunt Flaming Fireflies (don't even ask) against the Manassas Brigade- after the game, we were ready for lunch, I was up early & threw ribs on the smoker for T's end of season party (& was tired & grumpy), we drove about a mile north, & while the kids argued the virtues of Chipotle vs. Moe's, I weighed in on a chain restaurant (I wanted a sandwich) that was fine, everyone was VERY friendly, we all had a good lunch...(OK, it was Applebee's, probably my first time here in about 16 years, but it was a good sandwich-turkey/bacon/ avocado-I am NOT ashamed). Applebee's is better than Friday's and Ruby Tuesday, an at least on par with pimiento cheese. 1
jayandstacey Posted June 5, 2013 Posted June 5, 2013 My vote for "trite for decades": Giving a restaurant a random name, one not associated with any owner or even a local person, then making the name possesive. Like Applebee's. Note of course that many, many restaurants do this. I dislike the practice and think that in 50 years our successors will thing it was ridiculous...though of course a small cadre of nostalgic offerings will continue the trite trend.
thistle Posted June 5, 2013 Posted June 5, 2013 My son said that what he didn't like about chain restaurants was that everyone kept checking in with you & talking to you (he ate at an Applebee's recently w/ his Dad, in WV), this shouldn't be a negative quality, & it didn't bother me that much- but everyone we interacted with was very (almost scarily) friendly-fortunately, our waiter was the least obtrusive, & as I said, the food was pretty good...
DonRocks Posted June 24, 2013 Posted June 24, 2013 I think you should appreciate any group is trying to get better at what they do regardless of what that is. I know what you're saying but I think as we raise the bar collectively we challenge everyone to raise their game. Don't look down on Applebee's for trying to get better. Understand they are paying attention. Spoken like a true corporate drone. Seriously.
DaveO Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 The best of Applebees Spend $375 at Applebees  per person.
Escoffier Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 The best of Applebees Spend $375 at Applebees  per person. Geez, wish I'd known about this before we made our reservations at Del Ray Cafe. 1
Kev29 Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 Spend $375 at Applebees  per person. For all those suckers who couldn't get a Times Sq NYE res at Guy's American Kitchen & Bar.
deangold Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 I figure that I can get the best at Appleby's for about $3. Â A Coke!
lovehockey Posted December 31, 2013 Posted December 31, 2013 The best of Applebees Spend $375 at Applebees  per person. $250 for someone 12 and under!?!?!?!?!?
Escoffier Posted December 31, 2013 Posted December 31, 2013 And just to add more fuel (fool?) to the brouhaha, Gawker checks in with this...
Al Dente Posted December 23, 2014 Posted December 23, 2014 A Public Service Announcement brought to you by Applebee's Factoid: when my sister was in college she managed an Applebee's. One afternoon a customer (female) went into labor and sis delivered the baby right in a booth.
NolaCaine Posted July 1, 2016 Posted July 1, 2016 As pointed out in the Green Turtle thread, Applebees has replaced that nightmare in Ballston. My neighbors are quite displeased which puzzles me. Let's examine the location: Across the street from one hotel, walking distance to thousands of hotel rooms. What a great place for a fast bite of familiar food at a low cost. Furthermore, it's got a full bar (I assume) and friendly staff (again, assuming). Of course I'd rather pho, or any mom-and-pop shop but I don't hate the change. Furthermore, there's a Cheesetique right across a parking garage drive! When the flip out the mall, we will have more of these, I am sure, and will likely change my tune but for now, I welcome applebees and realize that I"m putting my DR membership at risk. In other news, how do we feel about the new decor of Grand Cru? I feel like i'm in Epcot; just me?
Al Dente Posted July 1, 2016 Posted July 1, 2016 As far as the Ruby Tuesdays, TGIFs, and their ilk go, Applebees is a bit better IMHO. Unrelated, but true story: Many years ago my sister managed an Applebees. One night, a pregnant woman's water broke in the dining room. My sister, being in charge, delivered the baby right on the banquette. Is that service or what? I can't recall whether or not the restaurant remained open for business the rest of the evening.
ktmoomau Posted July 1, 2016 Posted July 1, 2016 So this is why the hate.... those types of places coming into the area are a justification for other office buildings to raise rent and force out small owned businesses (like Willow- one of the reasons they cited for closing was a raising of rent). Â I am glad that Cheesetique could be there, so maybe not all small businesses are so effected. Â I would also prefer to have more good restaurants rather than World of Beer, Buffalo Wild Wings, Applebees and the Melting Pot (how does that place stay open???). Â I guess they fill the space for Carpool and Bailey's, but at least those places had some sort of character. Â We were gentrified AND now we are onto a new stage. Â From what you could see for the BID thing for the SER space, there are a number of small businesses that would like to come into that area. Â The more the chain restaurants move in, the more other real estate operators see those rents and think their space should be getting that amount too, so spaces like Willow and Matsutake sit empty hoping that Noodles and Co and the like from the mall move in, instead of lowering their rent. Â So we aren't getting some interesting restaurants that are looking around and looking for space because of those rents. Â We won't ever get the Dino's Grottos or etc at this point due to those rents. Â Â Anyway just my thoughts on the subject. Â I will never go, I don't know anyone in my neighborhood who will go, but obviously there are a few Arlingtonians or tourists who aren't complete snobs, which is fine- we need them to argue with all us snobs on ARLnow. Â (I do eat at chains from time to time, I am a normal person, but I do TRY very hard to choose small or medium size businesses as there are a lot of studies that small business improves our economy and the plight of the shrinking middle class. Â Plus I was raised by someone whose lifework has been to promote small and micro enterprise, so I try...) 2
dcs Posted July 1, 2016 Posted July 1, 2016 36 minutes ago, Al Dente said: As far as the Ruby Tuesdays, TGIFs, and their ilk go, Applebees is a bit better IMHO. Unrelated, but true story: Many years ago my sister managed an Applebees. One night, a pregnant woman's water broke in the dining room. My sister, being in charge, delivered the baby right on the banquette. Is that service or what? I can't recall whether or not the restaurant remained open for business the rest of the evening. I am surprised the other patrons did not complain in Sietsema's chat that management did not comp their meals.
The Hersch Posted July 2, 2016 Posted July 2, 2016 Two of the worst meals I've ever had in my life were at an Applebee's and a TGIF. The food was incredibly bad at both; at Applebee's, the service was annoying and intrusive, while at TGIF the service was passive-aggressive and frankly bizarre. I am perfectly happy to hate both establishments and will never set foot in either for the rest of my life. 1
Ericandblueboy Posted July 2, 2016 Posted July 2, 2016 21 hours ago, The Hersch said: Two of the worst meals I've ever had in my life were at an Applebee's and a TGIF. The food was incredibly bad at both; at Applebee's, the service was annoying and intrusive, while at TGIF the service was passive-aggressive and frankly bizarre. I am perfectly happy to hate both establishments and will never set foot in either for the rest of my life. Irony. Â I've never had such elitist attitude. Â I reserve my scorn for Jose Andre shitholes.
The Hersch Posted July 2, 2016 Posted July 2, 2016 43 minutes ago, Ericandblueboy said: Irony. Â I've never had such elitist attitude. Â I reserve my scorn for Jose Andre shitholes. If you're saying it's ironic that someone on donrockwell.com would characterize as "elitist" objecting to being treated like shit while being served inedible slop, I'd say I have to agree. If you're saying something else, well, perhaps not. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now