Keithstg Posted September 8, 2014 Posted September 8, 2014 Fascinating article in the WaPo this morning on police siezures, which indirectly references The Shack. Not sure where this should be posted since it deals with the former tenant, Smoking Rooster's.
DonRocks Posted September 8, 2014 Posted September 8, 2014 the former tenant, Smoking Rooster's. It sounds like Mandrel Stuart got totally hosed. Good for him for not accepting their B.S. settlement offer ("Hey, so here's the deal: We rob you, and we'll give you half your money back if you agree to forget about it. Deal?")
Pat Posted September 8, 2014 Posted September 8, 2014 It sounds like Mandrel Stuart got totally hosed. Good for him for not accepting their B.S. settlement offer ("Hey, so here's the deal: We rob you, and we'll give you half your money back if you agree to forget about it. Deal?") Reading that series is making my blood boil. They mentioned at least two people who lost restaurants because of that practice. The other was the Chinese man down South.
RWBooneJr Posted September 8, 2014 Posted September 8, 2014 I once represented an elderly woman who lost her home, basically because she let her accused drug-dealer son live there for a couple of months. Neither the woman nor the home had anything at all to do with any illegal activity, and she didn't appear to even be aware of her son's alleged wrongdoing. These seizure "laws" are awful.
Keithstg Posted September 9, 2014 Author Posted September 9, 2014 Additional information on Mandrel Stuart's treatment and subsequent loss of his restaurant. Hopefully Kevin Palizzi is no longer working in law enforcement.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now