Jump to content

Waitman

Members
  • Posts

    3,080
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Posts posted by Waitman

  1. 1 hour ago, Waitman said:

    What's the differential?

    1 hour ago, DonRocks said:

    It's a device that splits engine torque two ways, in order to compensate for the distance between the inner and outer wheels of a car when it goes around a turn. :)

    This is probably a discussion best had in this thread.

    MarkS likes this  Like this
    • OK.  We're in this thread.  What are separating the risotto from the stirred rice that makes "vegetarian risottoe" such a rare commodity?
  2. 10 hours ago, DonRocks said:

    I found these three threads, each of which had their most-recent post nine years ago: Asian Dumplings, Steak Frites, and now, Vegetarian Risotto.

    It's very easy to find Vegetable Risotto - which, in reality, isn't real risotto, but a vegetable-based rice dish - chefs like Roberto Donna, Cesare Lanfranconi, Enzo Fargioni, etc., must cringe at the thought of these stirred-rice dishes being called "risotto," and I will aggressively fight the misuse of the term. 

    Also, even vegetable risottos are generally made with chicken stock, sometimes veal or fish stock - it's very rare to find a purely vegetarian risotto, which is why I think this thread may be the most important of the three. Are there any authentic, "real" risottos out there that are made with vegetable stock? Almost surely, they'd all be made or finished with Parmigiano Reggiano, so they'd be lacto-vegetarian, but that's close enough. 

    Assuming these parameters (cheese is allowed; no type of meat stock is allowed), where can we find authentic, traditionally made, vegetarian risottos in the DC area?

    I wonder how many vegetarians in this city realize that I have great empathy for them being vegetarians, and that I could *easily* become one myself - forced to make a choice, I'd give up meat before I gave up dairy, and although I'd miss it, I'd adapt and live quite happily (fermented grape juice counts as being "vegetarian," doesn't it?)

    How do you define "risotto?" You say that chefs "cringe at the thought of these stirred-rice dishes being called "risotto," " in a way that makes it seem that something like Keller's mushroom risotto cannot by definition be an actual risotto? What's the differential?

  3. On 6/4/2016 at 5:50 PM, Pool Boy said:

    I have not been to P&P, so cannot compare, but I like Kinship's dining room (as well as the bar).

    So, question to everyone, I see almost universal acclaim here. There are some comments about pacing, and being hungry, but, at the end of the meal, were you full/satisfied?

    I am over tasting menus (or so I keep telling myself, as I went to Metier recently), so while P&P solves my problem with Rose's Luxury (problem being no reservations taken), P&P only does tasting menu, right?  TIA

    I thought the pacing was quite good.  I was hungry.  My girlfriend was full, having given me some of hers.  Generally, I'd say it was pretty "appropriate" amount of food.  

    • Like 1
  4. If I had to compare this to another restaurant (I've never been to Mintwood Place, so I beg your pardon), I would say Convivial is essentially 'Central Lite'. 

    Admittedly, we only had four dishes, but I'd think of Centrale as "Convivial lite."  My first impressions were much more impressive than my (entirely adequate) experiences at Central have been.

    And we didn't even eat any of the favorites, contenting ourselves with the burger (long story), pickled rockfish (he makes the only cole slaw in DC as good as mine.  Plus, you know, the fish), boudin noir with chestnut puree (creates sort of a culinary earworm, so that you taste it over and over again the next day. But a good one, not like "My Humps" or "Billy, Don't be a hero" or something like that) and the Key Lime Pie (very swell, although my friend says that "Speculoos" cookies --used in the crust -- conjur unfortunate associations).

    Cedric unchained is a force to be reckoned with.

    • Like 1
  5. Santoni loafers work with jeans when the shirt is, say, Etro, ideally with a Zegna blazer and a Charvet pocket handkerchef.

    Dammit! Etro shirts don't fit me off the rack and I just don't don't have the budget for bespoke!

    On the other hand, "dear, have a glass of Champagne in the bar, I'll just be dashing off to Charvet for a moment and then we'll head to dinner" (Mr Google says I'll just be 10 minutes away by foot when we check in, in May).

    • Like 1
  6. I find the list odd, especially for Todd.  He's always been a great advocated of ethnic and downscale, and deeply distrustful -- even disdainful -- of formality.  And suddenly Fiola Mare, a complete bastion of establishment eating is tops and Plume, which has historically been presented as underperforming in the kitchen and being a bit stiff on the floor is #6, (just a head of Bad Saint which is much more Klassic Kliman).  Speaking of establishment bastions, is it me, or did Bistro Bis kind of come out of nowhere?  And how about the return of the Inn at Little Washington?

    Interesting that Fiola Mare and Casa Luca make the top 10, but Fiola is absent.

    And, just to be cranky, I'd say that Little Serow and Central Michel Richard, both fine, seem vastly overrated to me based on recent experiences and Proof is more than a little tired.

  7. Amazing review!  Thank you.  I loved the rock 'n roll analogy.

    Reservation made.....Friday night at 6..........reward for what I was just informed with be a long day of house work.

    What the dress code?I

    I think jeans are fine. I personally think the sweet spot would be jeans, a sport coat and decent shoes, but I think you'd feel comfortable either more casually dressed or in a suit and tie.

    • Like 1
  8. Borderstan says:

    Chef Eric Ziebold is slated to officially turn on the grill at Kinship (1015 7th St. NW) the week of Dec. 21, spokeswoman Ellen Gale said. His other restaurant, Métier, is scheduled to open on the lower level of Kinship in early February.

    Was doing some last minute Christmas shopping at Urban Outfitters last night (and who wouldn't want to find a 25th Anniversary Limited Edition Vinyl Picture Disk of Michael Jackson's "Thriller" under the tree?) and picking up chicken wings at Hooter's (sue me) and decided to peek into the windows at Kinship.  Not saying that it couldn't open this week, but my narrow-angle view of the place through the papered windows did not present the bustle I identify with imminent opening.

  9. I was surprised last night to get, instead of a proper Martini, iced gin in a coupe at the Black Pearl bar.  Admittedly, for years I enjoyed iced gin but I have been swept up in the Cocktail Revolution and was surprised to find a bearded bartender with an array of obscure gins at his disposal serving 90s-style drinks.  I asked him to add Vermouth and a shot of Peychaud's and he did so.

    Dinner itself felt muddled.  I've never thought of New Orleans cooking as distinguished by nuance, so perhaps I got what I asked for when I shared a tasty crawfish etouffe, a slightly overcooked rockfish fillet on a mush of snow peas, mushrooms and onion cream, and too-crunchy fried green tomatoes heaped with shrimp remoulade.  Each dish had certain enjoyable assertiveness about it. But together they became undistinguished and repetitive -- like high-end stoner food or listening to a Led Zeppelin album all the way through.

  10. Am I the only person who read this and got chills up my spine?

    Somewhat tangential from your point, perhaps, but my impression of CC during my one brief visit there was that -- for all the glitter and delight -- it was utterly corporate, perhaps too perfect?  The decor, the food, the drinks, the staff -- all very sort-of wonderful, but all seemingly very planned out.  The package as a whole lacked a certain, I don't know, soul, for lack of a better word.  I would certainly drop by there again, if I were in the neighborhood, but it struck me more as an expense account place than a fun place.  I guess I just like things a little rough around the edges.

    • Like 1
  11. ould I pay $50 for a table at Rose's on Friday night at 7:30? Maybe, but I'd actually feel a lot better paying that to Rose's. It seems something like Nick Kokonas' Tock could not solve the problem, because Rose's does not strictly offer a tasting menu with more predictable table turn times.

    This is kind of the opposite side of the coin in the thinking that led to a huge jump in concert ticket prices about a decade ago.  Some smart cookie (supposedly the Rolling Stone's concert promoter) realized that scalpers were getting $200 for a ticket that the band was selling for $50, and decided to cut out the middle man. Interestingly (for Simul, anyway), a few years back I bought (for my wife, I would never do this for me!) tickets to a Billy Joel/Elton John extravaganza and, having acted quickly got like tenth row seats.  They added a second show and something came up, so I had to sell tickets for one night and buy similar tickets for the other on e-bay.  All three sets of tickets -- initial purchase, subsequent purchase an subsequent sale -- priced within 10% of each other, suggesting that someone in the Billy/Elton org had a pretty good handle on ticket demand.  And, despite my rocksnobbery, I had great time.

    I really don't get the resistance to this. We're at an incredible place where technology efficiently connects people who have something to someone who needs that something (e.g., time and a car to people who need to gets somewhere, Uber; extra space to travelers, Air BnB, etc). If someone has spare time and doesn't mind standing around outside, they can now get paid for that by someone who values his or her time more.  It's awesome.   :)

    Not trying to restart last week's argument.  But resistance is based on the idea that the line represents a real cost to line-standers imposed by the restaurant, either in time or money (except for people who like standing in line).  The idea that technology allows me to incur the expense and hassle of hiring a line-stander as opposed to allowing me to just make the stupid reservation on line is not comforting.  It's like a weird steampunk combination of silicon and barter or something.

  12. An article starring a good buddy of mine talking about the end of a highway plan that would have destroyed DC and his role in it:

    "The Insane Highway Plan That Would Have Bulldozed DC's Most Charming Neighborhoods" by Harry Jaffe on washingtonian.com

    For what it's worth, some people think that was the Three Sisters' curse, and not anything Matt and his crew did -- that doomed that bridge.

    Back in 1969 -- a year after rioters reacted to thh assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. by torching 14th Street from U Street to Massachusetts Avenue -- [Matt] Andrea had recently graduated from Georgetown University and settled near campus. Just above Georgetown, momentum was building to construct the Three Sisters Bridge over the Potomac, an expanse designed to carry cars and trucks over highways through the District. Andrea joined the battle against the bridge. "If those highways had come to fruition, there would be no U Street," he says between bites. "Shaw would be chopped up."

    Andrea is understating the case by a factor of several neighborhoods. Brookland would likely not exist as we know it. Nor would Brightwood, Petworth, Fort Totten, Takoma, West Potomac Park, Georgetown, or the Palisades. Room & Board would be an asphalt shoulder. "It would have carved the city up in such a way that there would have been no impetus for the revitalization we are seeing now," says Andrea. "Who wants to lie on the edge of a superhighway?

  13. C'mon man. That's a ludicrous response. You have time to row, you have time to stand in line.

    Btw, what other 4 star restaurant charges less than $70 with drinks? If your time is truly valuable, then Task Rabbit is for you.

    And indeed there will be time
    For the yellow smoke that slides along the street,
    Rubbing its back upon the window-panes;
    There will be time, there will be time
    To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet;
    There will be time to murder and create,
    And time for all the works and days of hands
    That lift and drop a question on your plate;
    Time for you and time for me,
    And time yet for a hundred indecisions,
    And for a hundred visions and revisions,
    Before the taking of a toast and tea.
     
    Rowing is my hobby, I enjoy doing it and consider it a productive use of my time. No one pretends to treat me as a "guest" (I wonder if I should have my guests queue for an hour or so before I serve them dinner this Sunday) and FWIW, practice is structured to try to accommodate team members' other lives as much as possible.  Standing in line is a chore for me and an impossibility for some others.   it's a chore that a restaurant could choose to eliminate.  And Rose's reasonable prices are also the product of many other factors including fast turns, inexpensive furnishings and decor, crowding, etc.  And if I'm -- per your suggestion -- resorting to TaskRabbit, the cost of dinner rises rapidly, no?
     
    Again, Rose's can do what it wants.  I've eaten there (though, before the cult became so widespread --  I probably queued less than 10 minutes in two visits), it's a great place.  I might even go back.  But, please, don't try to persuade me that standing in line is to my (or anyone's)  advantage, a hospitable experience, or an unavoidable cost of dining out.  It's not.  
    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...