Jump to content

RWBooneJr

Members
  • Posts

    865
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by RWBooneJr

  1. From her tone throughout the article it is clear that she condemns terrorism and violence of all stripes.  She points out though that by requiring any and all Muslim individuals to condemn radial-Islamic terrorism, you are placing some measure of guilt on them.

    This is correct, and the comments to the article apparently miss the point. While many of the comments are simply racist, the more sensible ones still presuppose a connection between Islam and terrorism that doesn't exist. It is the terrorist who are trying to make that connection, and the comments play right into their hands. This is not a struggle between Christians, et al. and Muslims, it's a struggle between humanity and evil. The fact that in this particular instance the evil shrouds itself in a fictionalized version of Islam is of no consequence.

  2. What is so profoundly ignorant ...

    Muslims do not become terrorists because of their religion, they become terrorists because they feel disenfranchised. That feeling is fostered by a Western society that views Muslim as "other" (and some would argue lesser). Islam doesn't drive the radicalization, it has been bastardized to suit the radical ends. The response demonstrated in the comments you post does nothing but further the feeling of marginalization. It's not just stupid, it's suicidal. Islam doesn't cause terrorism, we do in how we treat Muslims.

    • Like 1
  3. On 12/27/2015 at 4:07 PM, DonRocks said:

    Clarendon: Where you live when you get your first job, but aren't quite ready to leave college.

    Wrong.  For the most part, those people can no longer afford to live in Clarendon proper, though they arrive in droves on Friday and Saturday nights.  The demographic now is largely 27-34, and appears to be somewhat more female than male.  I also think that the men skew a bit older than the women (even after my old arse moved out of the neighborhood).

    • Like 3
  4. It is a very good restaurant, one this city is lucky to have, but its rabid appeal is lost on me.

    It's a very good restaurant that's not terribly expensive, has great service, and is, above all things, fun (if you let it be).  There are plenty of restaurants in DC that do better at each of these things, but few -- perhaps none -- all of them at once.

  5. This would be the archetype of what you describe.  They'll sell you one unglazed if that's what you're looking for.

    Spiral slicing the hams at the Tysons store was actually my job every Christmas break during college.  It was a twelve hour shift most days, and they fed us the rejects twice a day during our 15 minute meal breaks.  I still eat it now, so I guess it's either pretty good or I'm hopelessly brainwashed.

  6. Don Rockwell on the expansion of Marc Vetri's empire:

    Well, it looks like the dilution of quality has begun.

    Our readers can now find Osteria in the Multiple Locations Dining Guide with the rest of the chains.

     
    Don Rockwell on the contraction of Marc Vetri's empire:

    Once again, money takes precedence over legacy. I am so utterly unimpressed by this that I can't even begin to describe it.

    What's a chef to do?

    • Like 1
  7. Ray's--> in my mind, completely similar in quality of steaks, and at a fraction of the cost.  I'll take Ray's.

    I'd be (pleasantly) surprised, based on the apparent financial issues, if it isn't sold to a local restaurant group within the next six months.  Hopefully, they work everything out with their creditors and keep it going as-is, but if the creditors balk I'd guess that's where things are headed.  There's too much goodwill in the business for it to simply close.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...