Jump to content

jdl

Members
  • Posts

    183
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jdl

  1. I just wish the question would not be centered around is it Italian or not. Which has been the topic in the last three reviews by well known critic's
    But if he's more or less saying that the question all these people keep asking (rhetorically or otherwise) is kinda meaningless in the case of Trabocchi's cuisine, isn't it actually a good thing that he's addressing it here?
  2. Re this: "Just as absurd is three stars on a four star scale."

    How is that absurd? While I do think the review read like something closer to four than three, the NYT tends to be incredibly stingy with that fourth star. I'm pretty sure you can count on one hand the number of four-star restaurants in NYC right now, per the Times: Daniel, Le Bernardin, Jean Georges, Per Se and Masa.

    They don't do half stars, so three is next best. And guess what? Your boy has good company in the three-star 'hood. L'Atelier de Joël Robuchon, Alain Ducasse, Aquavit, Bouley for instance.

  3. How can anybody possibly read that review and think that Bruni is piling on? He's more or less declaring the "yeahbutisitItalian?" debate irrelevant.

    Key graphs: "Would you find these entrees in Italy, even up north? Maybe, in a very fussy restaurant. In most others, no. And who cares? They're prepared with finesse, and they're the definition of luxury, no matter the geography, no matter the language."

    And: "It owes apologies and explanations to no one. When a restaurant turns out this many dishes that make you stop mid-chew, nudge a companion and nod your head vigorously - because you're excited; because you need to start working off the calories any way you can - it needn't worry about fitting into a tidy box."

  4. I wonder how the Krugs themselves feel about this. Surely, the shift isn't lost on them. I once had the pleasure of lunching with Olivier Krug, who said -- over glasses of the Grande Cuvee and the then-unreleased 1990 Brut and the 1990 CdM -- that he rarely takes a non-breakfast meal without drinking some of his family's wine. (I almost asked him right then and there to adopt me.)

  5. I wouldn't use the term disappointed to describe my feelings about the newer style of Grande Cuvee, while I do prefer the older bolder style over the lighter style reflected with the new bottle. I find that the newer style tastes like they are using more chardonnay in the blend (the old style was 50% Pinot Noir), I believe that this reflects the market's desire for lighter champagnes, and I would prefer that they muck around with the blending of the Grande Cuvee than the vintage wines. I also wonder if LVHM might be pushing the house to release the Grande Cuvee sooner than they would have in the past.
    It's like they've replaced Elle Macpherson with, I dunno -- Kate Moss. Or something. The ample size of the earlier cuvee was really alluring, especially as it was presented in such a well-balanced package. Isn't being full-bodied and full-flavored a Krug hallmark? The new Grande Cuvee bottlings lack the toastiness of the old ones, too.

    It's hardly a bad wine -- just inferior to the earlier iterations and not necessarily in keeping with the house style I love so much.

  6. I have not tried it but I bought some. I have yet to be disappointed by a Krug.
    I have -- I think the new MV Grand Cuvee (the one with the new label) is a clear step below the earlier bottlings. CBut generally, I'm right there with you. The 85 in particular is a real stunner right now.
  7. Anybody here tried the 96 Krug yet? Is it worth the going rate? Do I already know the answer to that question? I'm afraid I do.

    But I'm having a hard time getting my mind around the idea of paying $60+ more for a 750 than I paid for magnums of the killer 1988. Hell, you used to be able to find Clos du Mesnil for this kind of coin!

    Price creep + weak dollar = bummed-out me.

    But I do love me some Krug. And the 96s have been awfully good.

  8. Three-course bar menu

    Consommé, English pudding

    Mmmmm, braised shoat shoulder!!!

    [edited to transform this from a stupid one-line post that adds nothing to the conversation about CityZen to a stupid haiku that still adds nothing to the conversation about CityZen. but the creative process sure was delicious!]

  9. I was wondering about this as I received a call from a California producer whose mailing list I've been on for several years now. They wanted to let me know that they couldn't ship my entire three pack at the same time. I thought it might be the new ownership just being a stickler for the rules, as I hadn't heard of the one-bottle-per-month restriction before. Guess not. As it turns out, they've decided to send the entire shipment at once. We'll see if it actually gets here.

    Meanwhile, I just took delivery of two cases from a certain New Jersey retailer.

  10. Things that do not seem to bode well for Mio's future: Nobody on DR.com aside from TinDC and I have had anything whatsoever to say about the food there (has anybody else even been?) ... the restaurant already lost its original chef, according to Tom ... and, though you can't see it online, the photo that accompanied today's "First Bite" column shows a whole lot of empty tables in the background. (Of course, that could just be a function of the time of day the photo was taken; but ....)

    As they say in the old country: Ruh-roh!

×
×
  • Create New...