Jump to content

Count Bobulescu

Members
  • Posts

    252
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Count Bobulescu

  1. On 12/8/2020 at 6:26 PM, DonRocks said:

    A whole lot of people - many of them wine writers - love using this term.

    I've never seriously used the term "wine snob" in my life - people are either pompous, or they're not, and it has nothing to do with wine.

    I've been an apprentice wine snob for 40+ years. Never managed to graduate. Suspect cheating by examiners.......

    An NZ wine judge tries a glass of "natural" PN in a restaurant, doesn't like it, and privately texts the winemaker that she should get another job. She publicices the text and then..... Here are two wine commentators on the matter.

    Although I've never met him, I consider Tom Wark a friend. We've spoken by phone several times and collaborated on a project. That said, I go with Wine-Searcher on this, even though I'm a fully paid up member of the League of Pear-Shaped men, and white, and old, and.........

    The comments section on Wark are well worth the read. Commentator vs. commentator.

    https://fermentationwineblog.com/2020/12/a-sip-of-wine-a-mean-email-a-bad-pr-move-an-ugly-tale/

    https://www.wine-searcher.com/m/2020/12/wines-problem-with-old-white-men

  2. I had read that part of the motivation for UAE & Bahrain was access to updated US military equipment. You seem to be suggesting otherwise, Israeli tech only?
    That makes sense insofar as Israel does not appear to have conceded much else. I believe Israel only agreed to a postponement, not cancellation, of some settlement proposals. Can you clarify the US tech issue?
    Given that Anal Dump has been popular in Israel since day one, new properties in the region would be no surprise.
  3. Consensus seems to be that she was the "safest" choice.
    Hope this marks the passing of the torch to a younger generation.
    When she announced her run for Prez, I was Gung Ho for her. By the time she dropped out I had soured, because of her repeated vacillation on policy issues. It's believed she dropped out before any vote was cast, because she was unlikely to win in Ca, which was an early primary. That said, I'll take her any day over the other side.
  4. On 7/29/2020 at 3:20 PM, Pool Boy said:


    So that leaves a Total Wine to now do most of my shopping in. I suppose I need to invest time and effort getting them to bring in some of the things I can no longer get within a reasonable drive from my house (say 15-20 minutes one way drive, I live in South Laurel, MD).

    I definitely would not rely on Total, especially for imported wines. At a guess I'd say 80-90% of their import selection comes via one importer, Saranty. Certainly 100% of their winery direct selections on the three central shelves, plus some above and below. Seems like Saranty is a shell importer. You won't find much info about them online, save that they are affiliated with William Deutch & Co, the nice people who work so hard to  bring you Yellow Tail.

    • Like 1
  5. 3 hours ago, Rhone1998 said:

    I think how the virus is contained is only half the equation. The commercial real estate market is a huge piece of this as well. If businesses suddenly wake up and realize that they can save a shit ton of money by cutting their physical footprint and letting employees who can continue to work from home, that’s going to totally transform our downtown areas, obviously to the extreme detriment of restaurants and other businesses that depended on the people who worked in those spaces. 

     
    First up, I incorrectly attributed the 24/5 timeline to Black Box, it was in fact McKinsey. I was skimming a report on a report. 
    T
    hat said you make a good point, maybe better than McKinsey, they don't seem to agree with you. They think CRE will recover quickly. See the 2nd exhibit
    Here .
  6. With the caveat that prediction (especially about the future) is difficult, one of the editors of the Rabo bank quarterly report on the wine industry, recently told a California audience they don't believe the on premise sector will recover to pre Covid levels before the end of 2022. That's the good news. Black Box Intelligence, which researches only the restaurant industry, has a time scale of 2024 to 2025+ depending on how the virus is contained.
  7. 20 hours ago, Pool Boy said:

    It would sure help if they actually passed these as laws instead of regulations and put some enforcement in place to make sure restaurants are complying. This situation is not going away anytime soon.

    Regulations do have the force of law.
    One difficulty with converting to statute, is that opponents would look for a sunset clause, and it would be a brave/foolish person who'd commit to a date certain at this point. Raising the price of violating the regs might be an easier way to go, but the violators have already been shut down, which is a significant fine.
  8.  

    As if on cue, from Md's legal newspaper.....

    Md. businesses, employees caught in the middle on masks

    Maryland businesses and their employees find themselves increasingly caught in a battle zone, expected to enforce the governor’s order that store customers wear face masks during the coronavirus pandemic even as some patrons are bridling at following that order. Employees and managers are having to persuade balking and sometimes angry customers that they need to wear the face coverings, all while avoiding a confrontation or summoning police. (Daily Record)

  9. From a Md political blog. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.......   Probably blew any hopes of a couple of Michelins........

     

    Quote

    Restaurant: My Staff Will Not Wear Face Masks

    by Adam Pagnucco

    By Adam Pagnucco.

    Last night, The Grille at Flower Hill, a restaurant in Gaithersburg, posted a complaint on Facebook about the county’s health department enforcing the county’s social distancing and mask rules. Specifically, the post said, “Let me be very clear…my staff will not wear face masks while working here at the Grille. If that bothers you then please dine elsewhere and please try to find something more important to occupy your time such as volunteer at a nursing home or soup kitchen. Whoever you are that filed the complaint, you need to take a good look in the mirror and try to find some real meaning in your life.”

     

  10. On 5/20/2020 at 7:35 PM, Count Bobulescu said:
    Great piece on the economics of third party food delivery via DoorDash, Uber Eats Postmates Grubhub etc.
    Great discussion in the comments  section with a Google employee who was trying to explain Google's position.

    I know it's bad form to quote yourself, but I'm feeling bad-ass today......

    A cold economic eye on food delivery.........The comments section is good too.
    Bottom line, from the comments, delivery company contracts, like credit card ones, apparently prohibit discriminatory pricing, as between eat in and delivery.
    I guess gas stations offering different cash & credit prices, does not violate that clause.

     

    Quote

     

    Delivery service price cap regulations

    by Tyler Cowen

    Ben emails me:

    Could you please consider and comment on some of the unseen consequences of local price caps on restaurant delivery services?  (Politico article describing the phenomenon in SF, NYC, etc.)  A highly competitive market for such services exists between GrubHub, DoorDash, Uber Eats, etc.  Moreover, patrons can always pickup and restaurants can always hire their own drivers.  That dynamic market will keep prices down and improve service quality and value.  As reported 2 days ago, 5/13/2020, in the Wall Street Journal, "America is stuck at Home, but Food Delivery Companies Still Struggle to Profit."  Yet many locals are considering regulating and limiting the prices that such delivery services can charge.

    Here is a NYT article on the same phenomenon, claiming that some apps charge up to 40% of the restaurant's take.

    My first question is why the restaurants do not charge higher prices for customers using the app.  That might be illegal in some localities, but surely that is not the general answer to the question.  Rather the restaurants are afraid of losing customer good will  -- "what!? I have to pay 30% more just because I bought it with my phone?"

    In this setting, restaurants are losing potential revenue to avoid a reputational hit, and staying in business (rather than closing up) because they believe the value of their future reputational franchise is high.  In other words, in both channels the restaurants perceive the value of their future reputational franchise to be pretty high.

    That is the good news, although you might wonder how it squares with the generally low returns to running a restaurant.  I suspect some restaurants simply know they are good and profitable because they are skilled, and the losers are overconfident and less well-informed.

    One efficiency advantage of the apps is that they will put the unprofitable restaurants out of business more quickly.

    The next question is whether some surplus from the profitable restaurants should, in the short run (and maybe in the longer run too?) be redistributed to the app company.

    The apps should increase the demand for the food from the good restaurants (easier to order and arrange delivery), but lower the profit margin on selling more of that food.  If those ingredients and kitchen capacity otherwise would go to complete waste, overall that seems like an acceptable bargain.  Kitchens are kept active, which is an efficiency gain, even if some profit is redistributed to the app company.

    In this scenario, you can think of the app as doing some of the selling, rather than the restaurant doing that selling, and reaping surplus from that effort.  In essence, the business of the restaurant has become more specialized, toward pure food production and away from selling, that latter service now being performed by the app company.

    Restaurants that were great at selling in the first place might be worse off.  But it is far from obvious that these apps and their prices should be decreasing efficiency.  Some other restaurants might be worse off because it is harder for them to carve up or segment the market, but that change likely is efficiency-enhancing.

    And if the apps do indeed speed the bankruptcy of the lesser restaurants (presumably what the critics have to believe), over the longer haul prices will indeed go up and the good restaurants will earn back some of what they lost up front.

    On net, consumers will have better services, better marketing, pay higher prices, and have a better selection of restaurants.  That just doesn't sound so terrible, or so necessitating government intervention to cap app prices.

    Note that informed customers probably need the app least, so they are least likely to see its value, just as "critics" as a class, including restaurant critics, are also least likely to see the value of the app in marketing the restaurants.  Of course this class of "critics" are exactly those who are most likely to be writing about the apps.

     

     

     
  11. 10 hours ago, DonRocks said:

    And yet, Yelp is a multi-billion dollar company, while we're on the verge of shutting down.


    The chain restaurants proliferate, grocery store wine sucks, and Total Wine is.......
    No one ever went broke by underestimating the stupidity of the American consumer.......
  12. On 5/7/2020 at 5:18 AM, Tom Power said:

    Liquid Liquidation Is Back!  (that's for the old school) 

    Corduroy quietly reopened for takeout last week.  This is more than a pivot, it's a brand new business with a lot of resources not going to use.    I have a lot of beer, wine and spirits on the shelf that might as well find a good home.  We have takeout, a virtual farmers market and super discounted adult beverages. You can pick up dinner, produce and cheap drinks in one stop curbside pick-up.  All alcohol purchases must be made with the purchase of a prepared food item.  Here is the To Go wine list that will be on line tomorrow.  Ordering is online through Tock right now which is still adapting to this.  Email corduroydc@mindspring.com for details.  

    wineList5.7.20.xlsx 26.68 kB · 44 downloads

     
    I know zilch + 0, squared, about restaurant POS systems. Came across the comment below in a tech article and it seemed worthwhile to post. Metha is a venture capitalist.
     
     
    Quote

    Mehta said he encourages businesses that want to offer takeout to use a system like Toast, that charges a flat $50 per month, rather than taking a big commission. For gift cards, he encourages them to use Square.

     

  13. Seems to me, it's a closed DC restaurant in Petworth trying to turn its wine inventory into cash. Legitimate under current temporary rules, but two big caveats. In the DC Covid Wine Guide, Seco Wine has listed its location as TBD. That's a big NoNo. Alcohol licenses attach to specific addresses. I also did a search of the DC license database for Seco Wine, and came up empty, but the database hasn't been updated since July 2019, so that could explain it, but the lack of specified location is still problematic.

    • Sad 1
  14. 2 hours ago, deangold said:

    Deceased is a trailing indicator. Lancet has a study giving 25 days at the median time from infection to death. From infection to seeking medical care is more like 10 days, don't really recall exactly. But the point is, deaths trail cases by someting on the order of 15 days. FWIW. 

    Understood, but recovery is also a lagging indicator 2-6 weeks. That's what confuses me.

  15. I've been watching a worldometer fatality number gradually creep up. It's in the closed cases box at the top of the page.
    It's an aggregate global number. There are two subcategories, recovered and deceased. Over the last three weeks or so, deceased as a % of closed has increased from 15 to 20-21%. Not sure what to make of it, except that it doesn't look good. Deceased increasing at a faster rate than recovered. Hopefully that will reverse after the apex.
     
  16. Harvard scientists are suggesting we may be in for periods of intermittent social distancing until 2022, or until a vaccine is found. They arrive at the number of 3.75 per 1,000 people as the point at which social distancing needs to be implemented, in order to keep the number needing critical care manageable.That's a lot (10x) higher than we're currently experiencing in the DMV. NY state is currently at around 2.5 per 1,000.  Maybe we'll need a thread for life after......
     
  17. 11 hours ago, Rhone1998 said:

    Might be a good time to join a CSA. There are a number of booze deliver options available...I opted to go with Ace Beverage and it was great-my order was delivered at no charge the next day, left on my front steps as I requested. 
     

    Believe that's illegal. Supposed to get a sig for booze.

×
×
  • Create New...