DonRocks Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204517204577042450465135874.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoramargolis Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Here's another one. It seems that the owner of Lululemon is an Ayn Rand acolyte. He's issued new shopping bags with "Who is John Galt?"* printed on them. But the customers who have bought expensive yoga clothing there think that Ayn Randism is the opposite of the philosophy underlying yoga practice. So maybe they'll boycott Lululemon and his Objectivist "self-interest" will find itself in the toilet, where it belongs. *the protagonist of Atlas Shrugged Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waitman Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Here's another one. It seems that the owner of Lululemon is an Ayn Rand acolyte. He's issued new shopping bags with "Who is John Galt?"* printed on them. But the customers who have bought expensive yoga clothing there think that Ayn Randism is the opposite of the philosophy underlying yoga practice. So maybe they'll boycott Lululemon and his Objectivist "self-interest" will find itself in the toilet, where it belongs. *the protagonist of Atlas Shrugged Well, there's the state of philosophical debate today: a shallow bit of philosophy plastered on a shopping bag causes wealthy yuppies to purchase expensive yogawear elsewhere. Socrates would be green with envy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sphere777 Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Well, your world-weary cynicism is quite the contribution to world philosophy, Waitman. Maybe you recall Wittgenstein's proposition: "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirite Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Well, your world-weary cynicism is quite the contribution to world philosophy, Waitman. Maybe you recall Wittgenstein's proposition: "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent." I attended a lecture by Ayn Rand in November 1965. Yes 1965. I don't remember much about the lecture, but she had a young man seated near her who took the audience questions and then passed them to Rand. I can't remember his name. And, no, she was not dressed for yoga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoramargolis Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 I attended a lecture by Ayn Rand in November 1965. Yes 1965. I don't remember much about the lecture, but she had a young man seated near her who took the audience questions and then passed them to Rand. I can't remember his name. And, no, she was not dressed for yoga. It was probably Nathaniel Branden, her #1 acolyte and lover. And Waitman, "Who is John Galt?" is not a shallow bit of philosophy on a shopping bag. It is emblematic of the business owner's adherence to a world view that fethishises a perpetually adolescent self-centeredness and dog-eat-dog anti-communitarianism. Once people realize that, they may decide to spend their money elsewhere, rather than reward him for his callousness. That's how it rolls in a "capitalist system", right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treznor Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 It was probably Nathaniel Branden, her #1 acolyte and lover. And Waitman, "Who is John Galt?" is not a shallow bit of philosophy on a shopping bag. It is emblematic of the business owner's adherence to a world view that fethishises a perpetually adolescent self-centeredness and dog-eat-dog anti-communitarianism. Once people realize that, they may decide to spend their money elsewhere, rather than reward him for his callousness. That's how it rolls in a "capitalist system", right? Is 'communitarianism' supposed to sound better than socialism or communism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonRocks Posted November 18, 2011 Author Share Posted November 18, 2011 [Aback on topic, please.] Fools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waitman Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Well, your world-weary cynicism is quite the contribution to world philosophy, Waitman. Maybe you recall Wittgenstein's proposition: "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent." From Ayn Rand on a shopping bag to Wittgenstein on a food board. Surrounded by sages, I am. Or fools. [on topic] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jparrott Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 I was hoping this thread would be about tasty fruit-infused pastry-cream desserts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweaked Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 I thought it was going to be some obscure Gandalf quote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jparrott Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 I once used a rhubarb fool as the cream part of a delicious trifle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DameEdna Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 I once used a rhubarb fool as the cream part of a delicious trifle. Trifling with a tart, I expect. Yum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kibbee Nayee Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 I once used a rhubarb fool as the cream part of a delicious trifle. I really like ful medames.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now