DonRocks Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 So sayeth a text message I just got! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SrtaJRosa Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 That's it? No mas informacion para nosotros? What's the topic of discussion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanielK Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 What's the topic of discussion? I'm going to guess wine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannah Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 CBS News Sunday Morning airs at 9am, and tomorrow's one of their periodic episodes concentrating on food. From the website: BOTTLENECK: Corks vs. Screw CapsFor more than 400 years, natural cork has closed almost every bottle of wine produced. Not any more. The reason? Some wine experts estimate that as much as 5 percent of wine is "tainted" by the cork due to TCA, a chemical process that can make even the finest wines smell and taste like wet cardboard. As a result, seven years ago, screwcaps came on the market. Today, 95 percent of all New Zealand wines have them, as do half of all wines from Australia. Just 5 percent of U.S. wines do, but the number is growing. Then -- there's the plastic stopper! And just on the scene: a glass cap. Correspondent Bill Plante reports. Also planned are various pieces on spices, pecans, food art (as in paintings of food), hot dogs, cooking schools, artificial sweeteners, desserts, and their closing nature segment (also known as "cat tv" because it generally features noisy birds which drive my cats mental) on turkeys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
synaesthesia Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Hehe... and I thought it was a response to the Morley Safer piece! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScotteeM Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Just watched the beginning, with the teasers for the stories, and an interview with Cathal was included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Slater Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Yes, and now we know that an hour and a half of filming = 5 seconds on camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Landrum Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Yes, and now we know that an hour and a half of filming = 5 seconds on camera. I think the question we all want answered is: "Were fluffers involved?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Slater Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 I think the question we all want answered is: "Were fluffers involved?" Duh. It's in my contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lydia R Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Yes, and now we know that an hour and a half of filming = 5 seconds on camera. If there were "snacks" for the crew, then I'd totally understand 90 minutes of filming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunnyJohn Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Yes, and now we know that an hour and a half of filming = 5 seconds on camera. Well Mark, be thankful it wasn't "60 Minutes" where the 5 seconds would probably be those where you appeared at your very worst during the 90 minutes of taping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now