Response: Point 1
I doubt it, but will have to take your word on that, as you are in the business. From a business perspective I see a restaurant that is not a draw and the Hilton, which I am no supporter of, wanting them out. If the ADA issue was raised it was a smoke screen. I am sure that there will be a new place there and will be modified. My guess is they have a little something better up their sleeve.
Response: Point 2 :
Well they are using it to further their cause, let see if it works.
Response: Point 3 :
You are correct the leasor does not have the ability, nor should be required, to install an elevator. My beef, no pun, is with the duration of time that they have been in that location without raising the issue. This is not a one year lease. Seems to me that the discussion happened around lease time, maybe a few months before. Why wait so long ? Furthermore they could have gone public years ago, as the Vets were not an issue.
As far as the Citronelle example-I was only pointing out the reality of business. If the place was a draw and profitable and made a condition or renewing the lease it would be done.
Can we hold the lessee of the space responsible for simple modifications, non structural, such as bathroom modifications? I notice Ray’s bathrooms are not ADA compliant, no bar’s or hand grabs. Is that because the county does not require it because of structure size or age or your landlord did not pay for it?
Response: Point 4 Agree
For the record again. I live in the neighborhood and eat at Ray’s often. I have a reservation card from the old day’s.