Jump to content

jca76

Members
  • Content Count

    136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

About jca76

  • Rank
    ventworm

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

673 profile views
  1. we went to rose's last weekend to celebrate a friend's birthday. she had made one of the "group dinner" reservations for eight people, where you get a "tasting menu" of dishes culled off of the regular menu for $75/person. i'd not done a large group reservation at rose's before, having never been particularly interested in the roof garden (given that the cost seemed disproportionate for the experience, based on descriptions here). we were at a long table (four on each side) in the back of the upstairs bar area, rather than the farmhouse table on the first floor near the bathroom (which i believe seats three on each side and two at the ends), which made conversation from end to end rather difficult due to distance and noise. the $75 cost here was still more than you would pay for food if you ordered (even quite heavily) a la carte, but it seems like a reasonable enough mark-up for the guarantee of a reserved table. unfortunately, i don't think the food at rose's is well suited to being structured as a tasting menu -- i.e., one dish at a time in succession. the main advantage of sharing-oriented small plates restaurants is the opportunity to have multiple dishes on the table at once, so that they can be compared/alternated between, and the last bites can be allocated according to who preferred what. (plus, many of the dishes feature the sort of bold flavors that contrast well with each other when there is variety on the table, but work less well in prolonged isolation.) moreover, gaps between dishes were too long, especially in the beginning when we were quite hungry. without knowing what was coming, i ended up eating a bit too heavily at the beginning. while dietary restrictions were accommodated, we didn't get any choice in the dishes. (and sadly we didn't get the two dishes that i most wanted off the online menu: the trenette and squash blossom rangoon, two of the few dishes we hadn't previously had.) from what i recall: CAVIAR & COCONUT -- the sweet-salty combo is tasty, but i would like a third element (finger lime for acid? something for crunch? just something). small bowls for each person. OYSTERS & GRANITA ("happy oysters", cultured cream, spicy aji limo granita) -- a delicious reminder of how much i have always liked their oyster and granita combos. surprisingly spicy (keep in mind we hadn't seen the menu before they arrived). GRILLED CUCUMBER (yogurt & anchovy) -- herby-fishy excellence. probably the most subtlety impressive dish. SMASHED POTATO (bagna cauda, cotija, hard-boiled egg) -- more anchovy brininess, which i like, the sort of haute drunk food at which aaron excels. LYCHEE SALAD (pork sausage, habanero & peanuts) -- i much preferred when they used the old morningstar fake sausage as the vegetarian accommodation. the house-made tempeh doesn't work as well in flavor or texture, although i'm sure it's much more natural. i still enjoy the salad, but it doesn't wow the way it used to (and some of the garlic slices in my portion were burnt). individually portioned rather than a larger bowl for sharing. RIGATONI ALLA VODKA (squid & thai basil) -- probably the most delicious dish of the night in the i-can't-stop-taking-bites way, bold vodka sauce flavor. not clear why this couldn't be vegetarian without the squid but our one vegi got the HERB PISTOU (spaghetti, jalapeno & pinenuts), which i found to be a bit too dry in texture and flat in flavor. acid and/or salt needed? BBQ SPARE RIBS (fish sauce caramel, tarragon) -- meat eaters cleaned this plate, looked great. the pescatarians got a plated version (i.e., individual filets) of the WHOLE-GRILLED DORADE (spring pea curry, sushi rice, snow pea gremolata), which was just okay, more muted than i would have expected from the description. we also got a side of some sort of grilled shredded lettuce and avocado salad, which was fine but sort of an odd accompaniment to the fish; maybe intended more to complement the ribs, which weren't a plated dish? desserts were a grapefruit sorbet that i found too pithy-bitter to enjoy, although others liked it. i loved the rich, almost butterscotchy custard in the POPCORN BRULEE, although i thought the whole popcorn kernels over the top were more distraction than anything. i would have preferred it if (1) the popcorn was broken up into bits, so that it was better integrated, and (2) more heavily salted, as i love a salty-sweet contrast. sorbet was individually portioned while the brulee was shared between two people. the big-table reservation worked well for the two couples in our group who have kids (and therefore value having a set reservation time when getting a sitter), but i otherwise wouldn't recommend this format as the way to experience rose's for people with the flexibility to come under normal circumstances. the bf and i left feeling very full and yet not entirely satisfied.
  2. glad to hear that they are ramping up a bit. there were no hot specials as of sunday (when rick was there). i don't know whether they lost staff during the closure, but jeffrey coincidentally left about a week before the flood, and i don't think they've replaced him with another chef yet.
  3. rose's is now rolling out same-day reservations. the description from the website: "Here is how it works; After we’ve chatted with everyone in line, our same day booking system will open up and show all remaining availability for that evening (currently available Monday through Thursday, after 5:30pm.) Then just click the rough time you want and voila, your dinner at Rose’s is booked! Seating times are not an exact science so please bear with us. We will do our best to seat you at your preferred time but occasionally guests can linger longer than expected. If this happens, we will do our absolute best to make sure your wait is no longer than 30 minutes max (if at all). " the bf and i were there last week (for the joint dinner with tug and taro, which took reservations), chatting with our server about how we don't come in as often as we'd like because we're deterred by the potential for a long wait. she commented that the night before had walk-in space from around 7:30 on. i wonder if the demand for the later end of weeknights (always our go-to anyway) has fallen to the point that this is their attempt at a solution to empty seats. the warning about up to thirty minutes of wait time is interesting; are they anticipating hiccups in the process?
  4. jca76

    The Michelin Guide

    i've been to a number of three-star restaurants in both the u.s. and europe. some of them are that transcendent, and some . . . aren't. in my experience, michelin has a strong bias in favor of formality/old-school service (at least outside of asia), which the inn would satisfy nicely. (i recently read a quote from rene redzepi where he referred to michelin as the "toilet guide," because ratings are a reflection of how nice your bathroom is. seems like a pretty good encapsulation of the problem. i've done a fair bit of eating in copenhagen, and its only three star, geranium, is by far the most formal restaurant of the top tasting menu places but has never surpassed my experiences at two-starred noma or kadeau -- and kadeau only got a second star after a change of location to a fancier setting.) while acknowledging that i've only been once and a few years ago at that, my memory of the inn is that it doesn't really merit a third star -- nor do many places that have received them, in my opinion -- and i'm not surprised that it got one. perhaps the real problem is that the scale is too compressed: there is a huge range within the three star band. maybe the inn deserves three stars, but my favorite restaurants deserve five.
  5. jca76

    The Michelin Guide

    das is the ethiopian restaurant in georgetown (right over the bridge) that used to be zed's (not sure if there was a change in ownership/kitchen with the name change). i haven't been in years, but zed's was a favorite . . . probably fifteen or more years ago? (if i recall correctly, it was the first place that i ever had shrimp at an ethiopian restaurant, which appealed to a pescatarian who sometimes likes variety beyond a veggie combo.) it is no surprise to me that in a city full of ethiopian restaurants, michelin honed in on the fanciest both in decor and neighborhood! that is hilarious and totally unsurprising re taro and tom.
  6. jca76

    The Michelin Guide

    Bib Gourmand list for DC is out. (I'm going to assume that the removal of 2 Amys is just due to its closure at the time of publication, and therefore avoid a rant.) Some excellent new additions, although the criteria for this list continue to be comically pointless given the proliferation of (not cheap) small plates restaurants where you couldn't really have a full meal under the cost threshold.
  7. the bf and i checked out himitsu's monday "supper club" last night, which i ringingly endorse. seven course menu for $90 (pre-tax/tip), which is expensive but not insane given the quality and quantity of the food. i would even go so far as to call it a good value (in the expensive world of tasting menus -- all relative, of course). how are these reservations not impossible to snag? (there are currently tables at a variety of times available every monday in september, which is as far out as they're currently booking.) but come hungry: it was a lot of food. multiple dishes basically felt full-sized, despite the tasting menu format. (i wonder if this is something that they will tweak with experience.) and be prepared for spice; almost every dish was spicy to some greater or lesser degree. the meal began with the akami crudo (tuna, compressed honeydew, chile, white onion, and shiso), which was the only item that pulled from the regular menu (although subbing shiso for . . . cilantro? if i recall correctly from a dinner last week). as expected with crudo at himitsu, it was a bright, balanced combination of fish, sweetness, spice, and acid. one of my favorite crudos since they've opened. next up was a sort of shumai (although i believe our shrimp filling was a pescatarian sub for boudin blanc -- bits of southern influence on this menu) in a soy broth liberally studded with salmon roe. i quite liked this dish, but it was right on the edge of being too salty for me, and i'm a salt fiend. i imagine some diners will find it too much. the dumplings themselves were a bit too big for one bite but a bit too soft to easily scoop from the bowl with the provided fork. (plus, all that roe!) i should have asked for a spoon. maybe my taste buds were a bit overwhelmed by the shumai, but a sprinkle of finishing salt on the "tartless" tomato tart probably would have been fine with me. (again, salt fiend; not necessarily a technical flaw.) a thick slice of heirloom tomato sitting in a pool of tomato water, topped with little heirloom grape tomatoes (peeled, maybe slightly cooked to condense flavor or just really good to start) and dotted with a spicy yellow paste (more tomato?). i vaguely recall something crunchy -- fried red quinoa, maybe? very summery. (i requested a spoon for the tomato water.) next up, a little pyramid of perfectly fried panelle cubes stacked atop concentric pools of a peppery-garlicky sauce and cauliflower puree. (yes, i did use my fingers to swipe up the last bits of that puree. screw spoons.) tasty but starchy -- could have easily had half as many cubes, given how much food was still to come. back to the southern influence with fried catfish over coleslaw. the coleslaw was bright (not creamy), with raw slices of beautiful purple carrot (which are presumably the same as they use for the awesome roasted carrot dish on the regular menu), the catfish was well fried (of course), and everything was complemented by creamy hot sauce underneath. deceptively simple-looking, immensely satisfying to eat. i think i had three small fillets, and i ate them all. i wasn't hungry by this point, but i couldn't leave anything behind. (really, the bf and i should have packed one dish up for someone's lunch today and split one plate at this point. hindsight.) given the size, we would have expected the catfish to be our last savory but for the fact that we were paced behind an adjacent table, which received a beef dish after the fish. our sub: seared scallops (at least three, possibly four?), fingerling potatoes, charred okra, a pool of salsa verde. very good but also the least favorite dish of an excellent meal, not really more than the sum of its (well-cooked) parts. for those who remember the early himitsu desserts fondly or just lament the lack of dessert offering on the regular menu: the supper club includes dessert! and it is excellent: a (coconut?) forbidden rice pudding studded with roasted pineapple, slivered avocado, and roasted peanuts, and dusted in lime zest. satisfying and complex without being too heavy at the end of a very filling meal. possibly my favorite dish of the night. the meal was great, but between the large portion sizes, the spiciness, and more than one fried/starchy dish, i definitely left in second trimester food baby territory. carlie's cocktails never disappoint; i love how much sherry she uses. (there were also three levels of wine pairing available, and the regular drinks list.) and it was great to have a way to experience himitsu's food with a reservation!
  8. jca76

    Preshow Dining Near Wolf Trap

    Going to Wolf Trap tonight, and given the rain, our initial plan of a pre-show picnic on the lawn is sounding less enticing. Has anyone eaten somewhere you'd recommend in the last two years?
  9. my understanding is that the majority of the wine, including the nicer stuff (e.g., the "reserve" list) was stored in the basement.
  10. i believe that rick also did a stint at oberlin in providence, one of ben sukle's two restaurants. oberlin is great, and sukle's flagship, birch, is in my opinion one of the best fine dining (in food style, although the environment is casual) restaurants in the country, and hands-down the best value for the level of food.
  11. i'm not sure what you think that we should have done. we ordered a majority of the menu. if i remember correctly, we passed on the aforementioned boring-sounding salad, a (fried?) rice dish, and a few not-exactly-light-sounding meat options. my original point was the dearth of lighter dishes/lack of balance on the menu overall, which seems particularly noteworthy when it's a small plates brunch and ordering "the whole shebang" is an explicit menu suggestion. neither quadrupling down on cucumbers nor leaving without eating seemed like better options at the time.
  12. i loved the tete de moine when we had it about six weeks ago; the honey was truffled, which added a lovely earthy element, and the hazelnut puree underneath was nicely salty. (p&p has always done well with plated cheese courses.) it was one of the best dishes of the night, along with the beet beggar's purse, the abalone, and the fennel sorbet. i've always enjoyed p&p, but the last few meals haven't left us quite as impressed as the first few, for no reason that i can clearly articulate. but looking at my list of favorites from our january meal, maybe the answer is that the dishes are very delicious but lack the wow factor that i want to call something a truly amazing dish? cheese, truffled honey, and salty nut flavors are a great combination, but also not unusual. same with the pasta: beets, caramelized onions, egg yolk, and cheese make for unctuous delight, but not wonder. in contrast, a recent celebratory dinner at komi was the best meal i've had there in recent memory, and affirmed komi's place as my favorite fine dining restaurant in dc.
  13. someone at 2 amys has finally started posting their nightly specials online, if one is inclined to check for steak (or other favorites). they ran out of pizza last night, if you can believe that!
  14. i've have some very good dinners at hazel and knew that they served some sort of dim sum brunch (although i'll admit to not having checked their menu in advance), so it was my suggestion to friends for sunday. one friend booked a 1:45 table -- the only time available online for four -- so we were surprised to arrive at the half-empty restaurant and be told that the kitchen closed at 2:00. (this put some pressure on us to order quickly and copiously, lest we wind up without enough food. normally i would have put in a smaller order and then added if we were still hungry. our server was shockingly unhelpful, given the format, when we sought quantity guidance, vaguely telling us that dishes are "meant to be shared." we get the concept, but when there's an ~$11 price range on individual dishes, there is also likely to be a pretty significant size range. we ended up ordering more than we needed, doubling up on some things, and being vaguely annoyed about it.) my main complaint is that the menu is extremely heavy and carby; we ended up with tater tots, sweet potatoes (which i'm pretty sure were listed as fingerling potatoes on the menu, but i enjoyed the smoked tofu and something bbq-adjacent sauces), fried chicken, and pan-fried dumplings. garlic cucumbers were very tasty and the only light dish we ordered; the only other green option that i recall was an extremely boring-sounding salad (that may have just been listed as greens and dressing), so we passed on it. (the online menu is outdated, so i'm going off of my memory.) i liked everything except for a square dish of shrimp and eggs, which had a minced layer of spicy-sauced shrimp (with their fire panda sauce?), a layer of fluffy omelet, topped confusingly with bonito and a mayonnaise-y sauce. it was very fishy-briny and also mayo-creamy, which was . . . weird and not particularly pleasant for more than a bite or two. but even liking almost everything, nothing blew me away and we all left feeling a bit weighed-down and yet vaguely unsatisfied. i'll be back for dinner, but will steer clear for brunch.
×