Jump to content
Meaghan

Tom Sietsema's Reviews

Recommended Posts

Washington’s Top Japanese Restaurants: The Omakase Case

In today’s Entertainment Guide, Tom Sietsema wrote about 3 Japanese restaurants in Washington, D.C. area: Sushi-Ko in Glover Park, Kaz Sushi Bistro downtown and Makoto on MacArthur Boulevard.

Some people ask about where to go for sushi. If you’re looking for top-notch places, these are my absolute favorites. Each are definitely unique to it’s own style. Tom S. certainly captured it exactly for what it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 for under $10

I'm glad that he gave a mention to el Golfo. Not only is it dirt cheap and very good, it's also one of the most Peanut-friendly places around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you order only one of the tapas at Mantis you will leave hungry. The beef is heartier than the other options but I still wouldn't qualify it as a meal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not the biggest fan of Tom Sietsema's dining reviews. Very rarely do I find his experience and appreciation (or lack thereof) of the food, service and decor of a restaurant to be similar to what I find when I go somewhere he's reviewed.

So it was a particular pleasure for me to see his column this past Sunday where he didn't review any restaurant. He simply wrote about Mother's Day, and his mom, his childhood, and how food and cooking connected them. I thought the article was fantastic. I may not believe that Tom Sietsema is a good restaurant reviewer. But based on that article, I'll say he's a great food writer. I, for one, would like to see him venture into more articles like last Sunday's.

[Don, there's probably a more suitable thread for this, but I'm unsure which one]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Every week a 2 star review.

July 16 Indigo Landing 2 stars

July 9 Upper Crust 2 stars

July 2 Breadline 0 stars

July 2 Galileo Lunch Grill 0 stars

July 2 Cuba de Ayer 0 stars

July 2 Deli City 0 stars

July 2 Lebanese Butcher 0 stars

July 2 Malaysia Kopitiam 0 stars

July 2 nhu Lan 0 stars

June 25 Bistro at Eve 3 stars

June 25 Majestic Café 2 stars

June 25 Taverna Cretekou 1.5 stars

Jun 18 1789 3 Stars

June 11 Bazin's on Church 2 stars

June 4 Rockfish 2 stars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
July 16 Indigo Landing 2 stars

July 9 Upper Crust 2 stars

July 2 Breadline 0 stars

July 2 Galileo Lunch Grill 0 stars

July 2 Cuba de Ayer 0 stars

July 2 Deli City 0 stars

July 2 Lebanese Butcher 0 stars

July 2 Malaysia Kopitiam 0 stars

July 2 nhu Lan 0 stars

June 25 Bistro at Eve 3 stars

June 25 Majestic Café 2 stars

June 25 Taverna Cretekou 1.5 stars

Jun 18 1789 3 Stars

June 11 Bazin's on Church 2 stars

June 4 Rockfish 2 stars

Alternately, you could say that he's given a 2 star review 5 of the last 7 weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't give stars at all the week he did the sandwich places - you can't fairly interpret that as zero stars, especially if you're trying to compute an average.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He didn't give stars at all the week he did the sandwich places - you can't fairly interpret that as zero stars, especially if you're trying to compute an average.
There's lies, damn lies and there's statistics. The orginal poster said "every week a 2 star review." It ain't so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

May 28 Ardeo: 2.5

May 21 Lima: 2

May 14 [No review]

May 7 [No review]

April 30 Viridian: 2

April 23 Willard Room: 1.5

April 16 Simply Home: 2

April 9 Birreria Paradiso: 2

April 2 100 King: 2.5

March 26 [Out of town restaurants-no stars given]

March 19 Faryab: 2

March 19 Grapeseed: 1.5

March 19 Passage to India: 2

March 12: Sette Bello: 2

March 5 Fogo de Chao: 2

February 26 David Craig: 2.5

February 19 Rasika: 2.5

February 12 [Romantic restaurants-no stars given]

January 29 Oya: 2.5

January 22 Acadiana: 2

Janaury 15 Cafe de Paris: 2

January 15 Evening Star Cafe: 2

January 15 Farenheit: 1.5

January 8 L'Auberge Provencale: 2.5

So basically, in 2006, Eve and 1789 are the only restaurants to break outside of the 1.5-2.5 star box with THREE WHOLE stars (not 3.5! or god forbid 4!). Depressing that DC's scene is apparently so consistently middling. I think I'd spew my Sunday coffee if I ever got to read about an area restaurant that was considered significantly better or worse than average. Or maybe average is just what gets reviewed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or maybe average is just what gets reviewed?

Are there any deserving restaurants that have gone unreviewed?

I'd like to see a little more variation in the ratings too - mostly more ones and threes - but are there any deserving four stars in that list? Which ones should be higher?

I'd argue that Rasika deserves three stars, and I haven't been to a lot of the ones on the list, but based on discussion here and elesewhere I don't think any really stand out above the rest of the crowd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Depressing that DC's scene is apparently so consistently middling.

Consistent, yes, but middling? I think you might be confusing restaurant reviewer stars with ratings of the on-a-scale-from-zero-to-ten-with-zero-being-poor-and-ten-being-excellent variety. Most reviewers, as far as I can tell, use stars approximately the same way your first grade teacher might have used stars. Do well, get a star. Do exceptionally well, get a gold star. Etc etc. On a four-star system, a rating of two stars does not mark the halfway point between epiphanous and inedible. Do so-so...that's a bit trickier. Michelin simply ignores the existence of such restaurants. A zero star rating in a newspaper, however, might mean anything from "meh" to "avoid like the plague", depending on the reviewer.

I blame professional food critics everywhere, and Michelin in particular, for using an information design that is short on intuitive context and is easily misinterpreted. I wonder if Edward Tufte has ever suggested an better alternative...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the notable exception of Black Salt (two stars from Tom-Rammy for best new restaurant of the year from others) which I felt was worth three stars (I couldn't resist!) I have agreed with him almost across the board for the restaurants that I have been to. I think there is another perspective to this which most do not seem to focus on: four stars represent an absolutely superlative national-even world class experience. For me there are only three restaurants in the area that are on this level: Maestro, Laboratorio and Citronelle. As much as I like CityZen, 2941 and Eve they are still a step or two below these three. Still, three stars is quite an accomplishment. But I want to emphasize my comment above: my raves about those three above are not just hometown chauvinism. They are THAT good. I believe all three are among America's best.

Four stars have to be earned...with time and with repeated excellence.

Maestro may even now be four and a half stars....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Consistent, yes, but middling? I think you might be confusing restaurant reviewer stars with ratings of the on-a-scale-from-zero-to-ten-with-zero-being-poor-and-ten-being-excellent variety.
I think you've hit the nail on the head with this. When Sietsema first unveiled his system, I seem to recall that a 1 star restaurant was worth going to if it was in your neighborhood, a 2 star restaurant was worth a trip across town or even across state lines for, a 3 star restaurant was among the best in the area, and a 4 star restaurant was an exceptional restaurant - among the best in the country. Zero star places tended to be popular places that he found middling or downright bad like Two Quail.

Of course they may mean completely different things at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Consistent, yes, but middling? I think you might be confusing restaurant reviewer stars with ratings of the on-a-scale-from-zero-to-ten-with-zero-being-poor-and-ten-being-excellent variety.
No, I'm not. I just find it queer that the vast majority of restaurants in DC--a city Sietsema himself calls distinguished, food-wise--are ranked at essentially the same very narrow level of quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you've hit the nail on the head with this. When Sietsema first unveiled his system, I seem to recall that a 1 star restaurant was worth going to if it was in your neighborhood, a 2 star restaurant was worth a trip across town or even across state lines for, a 3 star restaurant was among the best in the area, and a 4 star restaurant was an exceptional restaurant - among the best in the country.
So...the same way Michelin does/did. Buy more tires, kids!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, I'm not. I just find it queer that the vast majority of restaurants in DC--a city Sietsema himself calls distinguished, food-wise--are ranked at essentially the same very narrow level of quality.

Are you reading the reviews or just keeping track of the stars? If the latter, of course it seems narrow. If there were just stars (or diamonds or beans or whatever) awarded, you would lump everything together. But the reviews tell the more full story of the reviewer's experiences at the restaurant. Some two-stars had good food and good service, some had great food and bad service. Some were just cute, cozy joints that were great, but don't aspire to or achieve any much creativity, but do a good job and are worth visiting.

If we look at the list, I see a good variety of locations, cuisines and experiences. Most were two stars - Good. Do we really need a food critic to tell us that Maestro and Citronelle are fantastic every week? I think it's great that Tom isn't just reviewing only the top restaurants which most people only visit for special occasions if they can afford it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do we really need a food critic to tell us that Maestro and Citronelle are fantastic every week? I think it's great that Tom isn't just reviewing only the top restaurants which most people only visit for special occasions if they can afford it.
Nor, apparently, do we need a critic telling us about bad restaurants we shouldn't bother with. Seems they're all okee doke around here!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tom Sietsema: I am an optimist by nature (I know, I know, journalists are supposed to be sour and skeptical. "If your mother tells you she loves you," a writing coach once told his students, "check it out.") I go into every new restaurant hoping to like the place.

Sometimes reality intervenes, though, as it does this Sunday. For the first time since I introduced the star system three years ago, I'm giving a restaurant zero stars - a "poor" rating.

With so many choices out there, I think it's as important to know what to avoid as it is what to seek out. Especially if that restaurant is in a well-known neighborhood or has some "names" or pedigree attached to it.

From Tom's chat today... Can't wait to see what restaurant it is :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sometimes reality intervenes, though, as it does this Sunday. For the first time since I introduced the star system three years ago, I'm giving a restaurant zero stars - a "poor" rating.

With so many choices out there, I think it's as important to know what to avoid as it is what to seek out.

Hallelujiah. It's about bloody time he realized that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×